Who can compare the performance of the Nike KD3 and the Nike Nike Hyperfuse 2010 in every aspect

Neither comfort is too good. Especially hyperfuse.,I always feel that the design behind the shoe is not very comfortable.。。 However, hyperfuse low is better than kd3. It's a fact.

Nike Zoom Speed Configuration: Zoom+XDR in the forefoot, outfield, leather upper, better texture.

Nike Hyperfuse 2011 Low features: Fuse upper, which provides good breathability and a better fit to the foot. The midsole uses Zoom cushioning in the front and Sole in the rear, and the sole uses a deep herringbone pattern to provide good grip, with the addition of XDR.

The weight of the whole shoe is also very light, a low-top basketball shoe made for summer, and it is suitable for outdoor shoes worn in summer.

How to put it, these are two grades of sneakers, AJ 2011 counts as the highest-grade sneaker on the market of the year by Nike, and Hyperfuse can only be counted as a second-grade sneaker.

AJ 2011 is revolutionized by 2 pairs of insoles, a pair of 3 4 up Air Sole under and a pair of separate Zoom Air under the front and back

The introduction says that the Zoom Air is suitable for flying players, while the Air Sole is suitable for power players who require shock absorption.

When it comes to workmanship, adaptability and shock absorption, AJ 2011 undoubtedly prevails. Hyperfuse's advantage lies in the breathability and grip of the sole, and some people have commented that the AJ 2011's grip is not particularly good. In terms of sole material, Hyperfuse may be more wear-resistant.

If contact shooting, I feel like hyperfuse is enough. But when it comes to stability, Hyperfuse can't compare with the AJ 2011 with a carbon plate in the midsole. As for the breakthrough, it's half a catty, because the AJ 2011 insole is thicker, which makes the feedback a little slower when the force is generated.

Considering that HyperFuse is 500 cheaper than the original price of AJ 2011, all in all, it is better to buy Hyperfuse.

First of all, you don't need strong shock absorption to practice jump shots, and you don't need to have very strict protection for your feet without confrontation, so a pair without an air cushion or a pair of ordinary built-in air is enough, and of course, there is nothing wrong with wearing Zoom. As for the breakthrough is the starting speed, from this point of view, the forefoot zoom is the best choice, the zoom air cushion is the fastest feedback to the feet, and the weight of the shoe is also very critical, the lighter the better, which is why kb and nash both wear low-top, compared to hyperfuse is lighter than aj2011. In terms of wear resistance, 2011 uses crystal earth, hyperfuse uses rubber outsole, rubber bottom is better than crystal bottom, but the friction is still high crystal bottom, change direction and emergency stop are useful (this is only suitable for clean infield with dust outfield, the general field effect is not obvious), I personally think AJ's shoes are not particularly cost-effective, hyperfuse is a popular shoe, how to choose your own it, I tend to hyperfuse.

Nike Air Jordan 2011 is more comfortable and stable, but it is not as breathable and wear-resistant as Nike Zoom Hyperfuse, and my brother has bought it to wear Nike Zoom Hyperfuse 2010 in the outfield and Nike Zoom Hyperfuse in the infield

The Nike Zoom Hyperfuse 2010 is more breathable than the Nike Zoom Hyperfuse 2011.

Nike Air Jordan 2011, the boys on our school varsity team wore this.

Abrasion Resistance: (out of 10).

HyperForcer: (9 10) Standard outfield sole configuration, XDR

KD 4: (8 10) Since KD 4 has two versions, there is an outfield sole, an infielder, and a crystal one. So I don't know which one you're going to buy.

Hyperfuse 2011: (9 10) It's the same as HyperForce.

Weight: Hyperforce (: Fuce's upper, and Zoom's sole, the weight of the shoe itself is very light.

KD (8 10) I don't know why the materials are similar, but KD4 is a little heavier than those two pairs.

hyperfue (9 10): Very light, with a feeling of being close to the ground.

Support: Hyperforce (

KD (Hyperfuse (8 10) upper is softer.

Durability: It's all about the same, hyerfuse is a little more durable.

Overall, I recommend the Hyperfuse 2011, the best and cheapest shoes I've worn so far. It's really comfortable, you said you don't need to be too slow, KD and Hyperforce's zoom are more than hyperfuse, so the effect is much better, but you will find that hyperfuse doesn't have zoom's feet in front of it, and it feels like the fit is one. KD is relatively a bit louder, and the low-top feeling is still very good, HyperForce is an extension of Nike's Hyper series, nothing special.

So my recommendation is Hyperfuse 2011 and KD4

Nike Hyperfuse2014 is an exclusive sneaker for the men's World Basketball Championships, although it is an exclusive sneaker, but in terms of performance and practicality, there are many types of sneakers launched by Nike, according to different designs and technical applications, so they are not the same in terms of characteristics and value, but the launch of this Nike Hyperfuse has also attracted a lot of fans, in many forums we can see the relevant Nike Hyperfuse evaluation, As a basketball shoe that can be easily controlled both indoors and outdoors, this shoe is still very cost-effective.