5600 CPU installed on other computers 9 display 2 92GHZ 5600 ???????

It may be a problem with the CPU clock tuning chip of other computer motherboards, which automatically adds a little external frequency to the CPU. There are also those that encounter frequency reduction, such as my CPU nominal actual display only, because the external frequency is downgraded by the motherboard.

Enthusiastic answers, look at the lord!

5600+ was originally the main frequency.

As for the memory...

LZ should be an integrated graphics card. It is divided into a part and does existence.

So only. As for the hard drive, that's normal at all.

Now the hard disk size is calculated in 1000 base.

The system is calculated according to 1024.

In the end, even if 1g is less than about 70m.

CPU multiplier if you're 5600+.

I didn't set it up when I installed the system.

Find a professional one.

Then set the CPU clock speed.

These two CPUs are AMD AM2 interface old dual-core, performance, of course, 6000+ performance is better, the biggest difference between the two is:

5400+, working frequency, L2 cache 1m, power consumption 65W, now **25 yuan.

6000+ working frequency, L2 cache 2m, power consumption 125W, now **80 yuan.

The biggest difference between the two is power consumption, 125W power consumption is not what ordinary four-phase motherboards can install.

The difference between AMD5400+ and AMD5600+ two CPUs is that the main frequency and power consumption are different, and the others are basically the same, and the performance gap is about 1%, but now the two CPUs are products that have been phased out and discontinued, and the following is a parameter comparison of the two CPUs:

AMD 5400+ Parameters:

Applicable Type: Desktop.

CPU series: Athlon 64 x2

CPU Frequency:

Slot Type: Socket AM2

L2 cache: 1MB

Number of cores: Dual cores.

Thermal Design Power Consumption (TDP): 65W

AMD 5600+ Parameters:

Applicable Type: Desktop.

CPU series: Athlon X2

CPU Frequency:

Slot Type: Socket AM2

L2 cache: 1MB

Number of cores: Dual cores.

Thermal Design Power Consumption (TDP): 89W

The frequency of those is the same. It's just that the kernel process is different. The 5400+ is 65 nm with lower voltage power consumption. 5600+ is 90 nm with higher voltage power consumption. Level 2 is not the same.

AMD Athlon64 x2 56 parameters.

Applicable Type: Desktop CPU

CPU series Athlon64 x2

CPU cores.

CPU core windsor

CPU architecture 64-bit.

Encapsulation mode MPGA

Number of cores: Dual cores.

Operating power (W) 89W

Core voltage (v).

Craftsmanship (nm) 65 nm.

CPU frequency.

Main frequency (MHz) 2900MHz

Bus frequency(MHz) 1000MHz

Frequency doubling (double) external frequency parameter error correction 200MHz

It doesn't have to be enough

5600+ with 6750 can last at least 3-5 years

The performance is not bad, but elimination is inevitable Electronic products, how can there be no elimination However, 5600+, playing large games, with a better graphics card, can also run smoothly.

Outdated. However, if you work and run some work that does not have high performance on the graphics card and CPU, it is still fine.

Computer accessories will be replaced every few months, and no one will stop you if you want to change them. Anyway, my computer from 6 years ago is still in full swing.

It can still be used normally, can meet your needs, and can stably complete your day's work or entertainment, then there is no need to replace it, electronic products are updated very quickly, but it does not mean that the performance of the old accessories is very low Moreover, your accessories and motherboard specifications should not be compatible with the current new hardware except for the graphics card, and it is estimated that you have to replace the entire host so you can use it, and there is no need to change it.

You can choose the motherboard of the A88 A88XM A85X A85M chipset, and in terms of brand, you can choose products from first-line brands such as Gigabyte, MSI, and Asus, with better workmanship and quality. The parameters of the processor are:

Applicable Type: Desktop.

CPU series: Athlon X2

CPU Frequency:

Slot Type: Socket AM2

Number of pins: 940pin;

Number of cores: Dual cores.

Thermal Design Power Consumption (TDP): 89W

Friend, the 5600+ you asked should be AMD APU 5600. At present, AMD's APU uses FM2 or FM2+ interface, and the motherboard chips supported are mainly: A88 A88XM A85X A85M and other chips, A85 chips are cheaper than A88 chip motherboards**, both can support 5600K CPU, because the CPU with K has a certain overclocking ability, it is recommended to use the motherboard of A88 chip, which can perfectly play the performance of the APU.

A85 does not support automatic overclocking) If your budget is not too tight, strongly you choose the A88 motherboard. Suggestion: GIGABYTE F2A88XM-HD3 (all-rounder board) GIGABYTE F2A88XM-DS2 (There is a certain shrinkage in terms of scalability, but the chip is A88 and the performance is the same.)

But **cheaper)

First of all, the E5300 is indeed better than the AMD 5600+ in terms of performance, but! The two are not the same grade of products, E5300 is one grade higher, so it is natural to be one grade higher!

Five hundred and eight is a bit ruthless. Now the boxed E5300 (with fan) is only about 500 on the Internet. The bulk E5300 (without a fan) is only 430.

The boxed AMD5600+ is only 410, and the bulk one is even cheaper.

In addition, saying that "AMD's CPU is unstable" is just a rhetoric to fool people who don't know much about computers. AMD's CPU does generate more heat than Intel's, and that's because AMD's CPU runs much more frequently than Intel's, so it has a lot of heat. But this also shows that the performance of AMD is more powerful than Intel's in the same grade of CPU.

And that heat can be solved by pairing it with a better fan and case.

Of course the E5300 is good. AMD doesn't have an advantage at this price point. Highly recommend the Core 2 E5300

Adversity... Rich e no money a e board is also expensive stable and unstable, just like the difference between finding a needle in Qinghai Lake and finding a needle in the Pacific Ocean can be ignored.

The former is a bit better! It's just a little worse in terms of heat dissipation.