I recommend a few notebooks that are similar to the Acer 5552 N970 and other brands of notebook 10

Recommend you ASUS A42EI46JA graphics card is good, but not quad-core, notebook to quad-core? The heat is high, so the life of the computer will be short, think about it! In fact, the dual core is sufficient, and there is no need for four cores.

Dell's N5020 i5-480 2G RAM 500G HDD Discrete ATI5650 Inch **It's super cheap, only 4500

This computer is good, cost-effective, easier to use than i5, no brand of electronic products dares to guarantee 100% no problems, otherwise what is the use of after-sales service stations? Therefore, if you rely on luck, it is recommended to buy this computer cost-effectively, others who are lucky enough to buy Shenzhou for a few years without problems, and those who are unlucky to buy apples go back for half a day to break.

As the flagship product of the current AMD mobile processor, the N970 uses a native quad-core, main frequency, and 2M L2 cache.

The performance is very good and mainstream, and the multitasking is excellent. For today's daily applications and games, it does not pose a bottleneck with mid-to-high-end graphics cards. The power consumption control is also good, TDP 35W. And the notebook with it is often very affordable, so it is very cost-effective.

However, AMD's process and architecture in the mobile market has been much slower than Intel's. The N930 and the current Athlon-II Poison Dragon II, including the Pterodactyl II triple-core mobile processor, are only partially based on the K10 microarchitecture. The architecture itself is even inferior to the previous generation of Inel's Penryn architecture, and the current Core i3 i5 level architecture is even more obviously inferior.

Therefore, although AMD still adopts the strategy of multi-core and dual-core in the mobile market, the effect is not as obvious as that of the desktop level.

The advantages of N970's native quad-core are indeed better in multitasking, but due to the disadvantages of the architecture and the low default frequency, most applications are inferior to the Core i3's leather products, after all, there are still not many applications optimized for multi-core.

Many people think that the performance of quad-core products will be better than that of i5 5xx dual-core, but the performance of the CPU depends first on the micro-frame and then on the number of cores. Although the microarchitecture disadvantages of desktop-level AMD are obvious, they can be compensated for by very high clock speeds and other strong auxiliary specifications, but for the mobile market, due to power constraints, neither the main frequency nor the cache can be too high, and it is difficult to make up for the gap.

Therefore, in terms of its comprehensive performance, the N970 and the Core i3 are considered to be equal. However, laptops** paired with the N970 are generally at the same price point as the Core i3 (all other features are the same), or cheaper. Therefore, it still has a high selection value.

Of course, if you have to find a corresponding performance Intel, N930 is roughly similar to i3 330M 350M.

PS After the recent launch of the Phenom iix4 N9xx, the notebooks equipped with it** are generally very cheap, but some salespeople and JS will boast of its quad-core performance when selling it in the store, which is comparable to the Intel Core i7, and then sell it higher than the ** with the i5 processor. But in fact, it's only similar to or less than the i3. So don't be fooled by js.