-
Parameters: Sony HX9 Sony HX7
Optical zoom factor 16x 10x.
Digital zoom factor 20x 12x.
Focal length (equivalent to a 35mm camera) 24-384mm 25-250mm actual focal length f= f=
Aperture range (hx9 aperture is larger, more important) wide angle end 24mm 25mm
Camera flash Built-in (pop-up) Built-in.
HX9 is more high-end than HX7, and HX7 is bound to be more cost-effective, depending on what you value HX9 is not yet on the market (some**2450 yuan** is HX7 at all**), if it is just listed, **moisture must be very large. HX7 has been on the market for a long time, and there is relatively little moisture.
-
I'll send you a link.,You can see for yourself.,Compared to SonyHX7The advantage is much greater.,The function is also much more powerful than Sonyhx9.,Don't say much.,Direct link,Compare it yourself.。
-
The main difference between the HX9 and the HX7 is that the HX7 will be released first, and the HX9 will be released later. The products that go to market first are naturally not as good as those that go on the market later in terms of performance. But both of these are toy cameras and are of little use for professionals.
There are some slight differences in focal length and aperture, but ** is much worse. If you really want to buy it, you can wait, there is still room for HX9 price reduction.
-
The HX5C is a relatively early model, and it was the best portable telephoto camera of the year, and the hardware with it is something that Sony is good at. The picture quality is good, and the control is relatively convenient. Commonly used functions are available, some exclusive tricks are also very practical, you can easily shoot well, and the shooting function is also very good.
Now this ** is already very attractive, and it is worth starting.
As for the HX7 and HX9, due to their late launch, some new features have been added, which will look more attractive, but in reality it is only the number of pixels that have been improved. The factors that really affect the image quality have not changed much, and if we talk about the cost performance, the HX7 is higher. As far as use is concerned, HX9 may also need to purchase accessories such as connected external flashes, which is a relatively large investment.
In addition, you also need to look at your choice of camera appearance, I personally think that the appearance of the original HX5C is a classic, and the HX7 may be better in terms of grip feeling, but the appearance is a matter of opinion.
Hope the answer helps you.
-
The Sony HX7 is a portable telephoto DC with very strong overall strength. The machine has 16.2 million effective pixels, 10x optical zoom capability, and an equivalent focal length of 25-250mm. The Sony HX7 is rich in features, including panorama scanning, backlit HDR, 10fps high-speed continuous shooting, and background blur function, which are useful functions that have been tested in practice for a long time.
In addition, the camera is equipped with a new high-resolution scanning panorama function, capable of capturing stunning panoramas of 10480 4096 pixels**. For those who pursue portability, and at the same time pursue a sail hole to go around the world, Sony HX7 will definitely not disappoint you.
Product advantages: 25mm wide-angle 10 times photo-variable G head The practicability is quite high.
The high-resolution panoramic scanning function provides high-quality panoramic images.
The 16.2 million pixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor has good noise control.
Relative shortcomings: The battery is slightly thin compared to the HX7 body, and the battery life is average.
The ability to express the details of the picture is a little average.
-
Both the HX100 and HX200 are large telephoto.
The camera, 30x light change, the pixels have been upgraded, other changes are basically none, the shape has changed slightly, the back-illuminated CMOS, Olympus.
The SZ series is a smaller telephoto machine, with 25x optical zoom, which cannot be compared with Sony's HX series, Olympus' SP810 is of the same type as Sony's HX100, and Sony's HX9, HX10 and Olympus SZ series are of the same type, so there is no comparison.
High-sensitivity shooting effect, noise.
The control is definitely better than Sony, which is the biggest advantage of the back illumination to make the fierce CMOS, but it does not represent the image quality, the large telephoto camera because the distance between the lens and the photosensitive element is longer (flange distance), in the case of the same size of the CMOS, it is definitely better than the camera with a shorter flange distance, so the card camera.
The effect is the worst.
You first have to decide whether to buy a large telephoto (large volume) or a small card telephoto machine, in fact, now the operation of various brands is almost the same, mainly to see the cost performance, Sony price Tanzhen Bridge is expensive, Olympus, Fuji is relatively cheap travel shirts. The features are not much different.
I use this camera a lot, because that's what I sell, and I don't know much about other brands, but as far as Sony digital cameras are concerned, the HX30 is very good, and it can be positioned as a high-end digital card camera for home use. >>>More
Personal suggestions and opinions for your reference: Sony T900 is a card player with a periscope lens, and the imaging effect is slightly lower than that of the Sony W290 card player with a telescopic lens. Sony T900, Sony W290 is a fully automatic camera, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, but can cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments through various shooting modes pre-made in the machine, but in the case of poor light, especially when shooting night scenes, the imaging effect will not be ideal, but the general home is fully competent. >>>More
If you like the classical mid-high frequency, if you care about sound coloring, choose i9. I haven't heard it, but almost all reviews on the Internet say that this machine has a thin voice and compares cups. >>>More
The Sony A 6500 has 5-axis internal stabilization, allowing you to shoot at a much slower shutter speed and no blur in your hand. A 6400 does not. IBIS not only helps to eliminate handshake blur in **, but also helps to composite images, especially when using zoom lenses. >>>More
I'm a super mentally retarded - manager level 4 hero, and the source must be given for citing the answer, otherwise there is a suspicion of plagiarism. >>>More