Can the same person sue for the same thing?

This should not be allowed, after all, it is the same thing, the same person did it, and there will be no other.

For the same thing, the same person, your claims can be different, you may have wanted to achieve such a goal when you litied, but this purpose was not successful, you can narrow him down to your reasonable range to make a claim.

Can one person sue another? Since it's the same thing, the same person, there is no need for another prayer lawsuit, and one is not over.

This is completely possible, different claims, of course, you can file different lawsuits, then depending on the situation, even the same person can fight the doer.

As long as there is evidence, it can be sued on another claim.

Of course you can, different people are not the same.

The same municipality and the same person cannot be considered to be the place of action before the end of this lawsuit.

There is no appeal of yin and yang, because they are talking about the same thing.

If he really loves you, cherish it, and if he doesn't, give it up, so it's good for yourself, and don't let yourself end up hurting more.

For the same matter, the same person can sue with another claim.

The same thing and the same person, well, can have multiple claims at the same time in one case.

Legal analysis: 1. If the same facts and litigation claims have been determined by the court, they cannot be sued again. 2. If the court does not accept or withdraw the lawsuit on the same facts, or if it is not the same litigation claim, it may file a lawsuit again.

Legal basis: Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 212:In cases where a ruling is made not to accept or reject a lawsuit, and the plaintiff initiates a lawsuit again, and meets the requirements for initiating a lawsuit and does not fall under the circumstances provided for in article 124 of the Civil Procedure Law, the people's court shall accept it. Prepare for the letter.

Article 210: Where the plaintiff withdraws the lawsuit or the people's court handles it as withdrawn, and the plaintiff files a lawsuit again with the same claim, the people's court shall accept it.

In divorce cases where the plaintiff withdraws the lawsuit or is handled as withdrawn, and there are no new circumstances or new reasons, and the lawsuit is filed again within six months, it is not to be accepted in accordance with the provisions of article 124, item 7 of the Civil Procedure Law.

Generally not, under normal circumstances, if it is a joint crime, most of the cases will be prosecuted together, and at this time, manpower and material resources will not be wasted and prosecuted together, and the trial of the case will be more comprehensive. There are two types of joint crimes: general accomplices and special accomplices, i.e., criminal groups. Ordinary accomplices refer to two or more persons who commit a crime together and intentionally, and a relatively fixed criminal group formed by three or more persons for the purpose of jointly committing a crime is a criminal group.

Article 27 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China provides that accomplices shall be mitigated, commuted, or exempted from punishment.

Multiple contracts filed by the same party may not be sued together. According to the relevant legal provisions, joint proceedings may be joined. The parties must agree to joinder. Multiple contract disputes do not belong to the same subject matter of litigation and are not joint litigation.

Can multiple parties to a contract be sued?

There are multiple parties to the contract, and some of the parties can sue, but they must meet the conditions for sueing, that is, the plaintiff is the direct interested party in the case; There is a clear defendant; There is a complaint that sets out the specific claims, facts, and reasons; and that the case is within the jurisdiction of the court to which the suit is filed.

Can multiple contracts be sued together?

If there are any of the following situations between multiple contracts, the lawsuit may be filed together: 1. The subjects of multiple contracts are the same or related; 2. The contents of multiple contracts are related; 3. Multiple contracts prove the same or similar litigation facts; 4. Multiple contracts have the same cause of action. According to the law, if multiple contracts prove the same facts and constitute the same legal relationship, the people's court may combine them for trial.

If the parties in multiple contracts are the same, but constitute different legal relationships, the people's court may decide whether to combine them according to the specific circumstances.

Can multiple loan contracts be sued at once?

Multiple loan contracts can be litigated together. Joint litigation refers to litigation in which one or both parties are two or more persons, the subject matter of the litigation is common, or the subject matter of the litigation belongs to the same type, and the people's court deems that it can be tried together with the consent of the parties. According to the law, if multiple loan contracts correspond to the same parties, they can file a lawsuit together.

In addition, if one of the parties is two or more parties, and the subject matter of the litigation is joint, the people's court may hear the contract.

Can there be more than one main contract of the guarantee contract?

The main contract of the guarantee contract can be more than one. The subordinate contract depends on the existence of the main contract, so the subordinate contract is also called a subsidiary contract. The main feature of the slave contract is its ancillary nature, that is, it cannot exist independently, and must be premised on the existence and effectiveness of the main contract.

Can a party to a contract sue for breach of contract and failure to pay liquidated damages?

If the breaching party fails to pay the liquidated damages, the non-breaching party may file a lawsuit with the people's court, and the time for calculating the liquidated damages can be determined until the date on which the judgment takes effect. Once the people's court makes an effective ruling on the dispute between the parties, it is determined whether and how to bear the liability for breach of contract in the dispute between the parties and late payment, and the parties shall perform their obligations in accordance with the requirements of the people's court's judgment, including the payment of liquidated damages. At this time, the debtor is no longer liable to the creditor for breach of contract, but the responsibility for performing the payment obligations determined by the effective legal documents.

The debtor's non-performance of debts is no longer an act of breach of contract, but an act of non-performance of effective legal documents, and what it should bear is no longer the liability for breach of contract, but the statutory liability for delay in performance, and the way to bear its responsibility is no longer to pay liquidated damages, but to double the payment of interest on the debt during the period of delay in performance or pay the delay in performance in accordance with Article 232 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China.