Which of these two WWII games is better?

I like it too, I prefer Call of Duty, 4 does a good job, recommended!!

Call of Duty 4 is interfering in the internal affairs of other countries, just like fighting Iraq, maybe the next version will hit China, (secret infiltration is one generation to fight Muslims and the second generation to fight China) I don't play. However, the first two versions of Call of Duty are good, and the third version does not have a PC version, and it is said that it does not do very well.

The best of the Medal of Honor is the latest Airborne Soldier, but the requirements for the machine are relatively high, and the other versions are also very good, and I have cleared them.

Other main-view games that return to the Wolfenstein headquarters and assassinate Hitler earlier can also be seen.

If the configuration is good, Call of Duty 4 and Medal of Honor Airborne Forces are both recommended to play. Call of Duty 4 is in English, and the Airborne Forces of the Medal of Honor is available in Chinese.

If it's a first-person shooter, I recommend the latest one of "Medal of Honor: Divine Airborne" Call of Duty 4 is not a World War II theme, but it's not bad I like to play Allied death squads, but it's not first-person I don't know if the landlord has to shoot first-person.

Personally, I think the Medal of Honor is more difficult to play than Call of Duty, which goes through classic battles, and the companies that developed them on the game screen are very famous companies, so the graphics are similar. If you like to play some classic battles, you can choose Call of Duty.

Call of Duty is much better than Medal of Honor. The first is that the 3D effect is better than the two. The Medal of Honor is outdated.

The Airborne Forces are not realistic enough, and compared to their previous versions, EA lost the first place in the hegemon. The makers of Call of Duty are the original team behind EA's Medal of Honor. The technology has EA and also combines its own.

It is recommended to play Call of Duty 2, which is a product of '06. Call of Duty 5 is now availableThe background is the Pacific Theater.

It's much better than '04's "Medal of Honor: Blood in the Pacific".

If you want to play the coordination class, it is BIA's "Brothers in Arms". But this game is more difficult than the first two. Because it's different from normal FPS, it's more special.

I support Call of Duty

But why choose 2?

Can you pick one of the new ones?

1.Sneak attack on Pearl Harbor - Death air raid.

Pearl Harbor is a game that belongs to the type of combat skewers. In the game, each level has to do some attacks and eliminations. After passing the level, you can also obtain the ability attributes and parts of the aircraft to improve your combat ability.

2.The storm of World War II.

A World War II-themed strategy game in which the player becomes a commander or officer who leads troops into battle. In different areas, the tactics used and some classes also need to be changed, otherwise it will be difficult to win.

3.Second world war.

This game is a strategic development game, and players can choose several countries from World War II to experience. Different countries have different development and scientific and technological capabilities, and they can launch attacks after having a certain ability to imitate mountains.

4.World War II sniper.

A World War II-themed sniper game. In this game, the player takes on the role of the protagonist who has to kill some enemy officers in order to complete the mission. The difficulty is increased in different missions, pay attention to the choice of sniper position.

5.WWII Storm 2

This game is a strategic real-time battle setting. What players need to do well is to choose the combination of arms and the position. Because in different geographical locations, whether offensive or defensive, there are some complements and weaknesses that need to be taken advantage of.