Sony W220, W210 vs. Canon A2000, IXUS 95 IS 80 IS, which one is better value for money?

Personal suggestions and opinions for your reference: Sony W210, W220, Canon Ixus IS, Canon A2000IS models, the most important imaging device photoreceptor chip CCD size is almost the same, are about 1 inch, although some have millions of pixels improved, the actual imaging effect does not have any major substantive differences, basically the same type, the same grade model. Sony W210, W220, Canon Ixus IS, Canon A2000is are all fully automatic cameras, in actual shooting, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, can only be pre-staged in the camera to cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, especially in the case of poor light, especially when shooting night scenes, the imaging effect will not be very ideal, but the general home can be fully competent.

Canon's new models such as Canon IXUS and Canon IXUS old models, Sony's new models such as Sony T90, T900, W210, W220, W290 and Sony T series, W series old models, the most important imaging device photoreceptor chip CCD size is almost the same, are about 1 inch, although some have millions of pixels, there is no major substantive difference in the actual imaging effect, basically the same type, the same grade model, belongs to the new bottle of old wine,There are no outstanding functions,Just some more fancy functions that have no impact on improving the imaging effect,Because it has just been launched,**High,The current cost performance is low。 The Canon A2000is is better in terms of cost performance and practicality, mainly with a 6x optical zoom. Buying a camera is the same as buying a computer, what suits you is the best, you can compare them according to your own price and preferences, and check the information on the Internet.

I think that Sony W210 and W220 are more cost-effective than Canon, and they also have a good appearance and many colors.

sony

The W220 is certainly a good cost-effective choice. I also have one. It's pretty easy to use.

Sony W220: 12 million pixels, 4x optical zoom, wide angle 30mm, optical image stabilization, inch LCD display, use of MS memory stick.

Canon ixus

95IS: 10 million effective pixels, 3x optical zoom, wide-angle 35mm, optical image stabilization, inch "Jingxuan II" LCD screen, using SD card.

From the perspective of configuration alone, the Sony W220 is of course stronger. However, the advantage of Canon is that there are fewer failures in the shooting, so everyone generally prefers Canon. Depending on your requirements, the main thing is to buy a practical one, then of course it will be more suitable to choose the Canon 95is.

I don't think it's good to have a higher configuration.

Definitely Canon's ixus95

It's a lot of expertise.

and workmanship imaging are excellent.

Beijing] merchants**: 1590

to 1880

Effective pixels: 10 million.

Optical zoom: 3x.

Equivalent to 35:35-105

First of all, I want to say, Canon has come out with one, the full name is Canon ixus95is, so I will correct it for you, Canon ixus95 and Canon ixus95is are actually the same model, it is normal to be depressed with these two, and the cost performance is good, you just close your eyes and take one, now ixus95

is the price adjustment, take a look, our **.

It's all domestically assembled.,Definitely choose W220.,It's almost the same** from the function alone, it's better than 95.。

1. The positioning of all these two cameras is similar to **.

IXUS 210 1400W pixel 5x light change touch screen lithium battery.

WX10 1600W pixel 7x light variable inch LCD screen lithium battery.

Let's talk about Canon, I think Canon's imaging is much better than Sony's, that's for sure, I'm also a long-time Canon user.

I once tried Sony's W350 and the imaging wasn't very realistic.

But Canon's 210 I don't recommend it very much.

First of all, the touch screen is easy to break and the operation is not smooth. Secondly, the touch screen has light leakage that affects the imaging (a problem with this series). Again, the screen is too large to be practical, and the NB-6L battery used has an ultra-small capacity, and the battery life for taking pictures is very poor.

Canon doesn't try touchscreen cameras too much, which means that touching a camera with a large screen won't be an advantage.

Let's talk about Sony. The W series now seems to be a big step forward. CMOS imaging has a very good performance, the maximum aperture of this camera is already very good, effectively reducing hand shake during night scenes, you can shoot night scenes by hand, and the zoom magnification is also relatively large, which is easier to capture.

The 24mm wide-angle lens is also suitable for group shots.

Let's talk about Sony's shortcomings. 16 million pixels are obviously inflated, and it doesn't make sense to increase the pixels when the sensor is all 1 inch, it's just a gimmick for a business. Sony's menus are more difficult to navigate, which is not comparable to the control of most Canon cameras (except for Canon touch phones);

I choose one of the two, I choose Sony.

However, neither camera has or very few fully automatic capabilities.

If you're willing to add a few hundred more, I recommend the Canon Powershot SX 210 IS, it's pretty good.

Because the ixus210 is not worth buying, I choose the wx10

It's definitely 210 good! Sony's imaging is not professional!