I would like to consult with you about the law, and I would like to ask you about the law

Where raised animals cause harm to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear responsibility. Where the victim is also at fault for the occurrence of the harm, the infringer's civil liability may be reduced. If you do not manage and restrain the dog well, and fail to fulfill your due management responsibilities, resulting in the damage caused by the other party being frightened, you should bear the main liability for compensation.

However, if the other party is too panicked after being frightened by the dog and takes unfavorable measures and falls and injures himself, he should also bear some responsibility for the consequences of the damage. It should also be determined according to the disability appraisal, and generally only the compensation for mental damages is sufficient.

Article 78 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China provides that if a raised animal causes damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability, but if it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, the liability may not be borne or reduced.

Article 79: Where management provisions are violated by failing to take safety measures against animals and causing harm to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability.

Article 84: Raising animals shall abide by the law, respect social morality, and must not interfere with the lives of others.

Since your negligence in the management of your pet is the direct cause of the other party's injury, and the other party is also at fault for driving a motor vehicle that does not obey the traffic rules, it is reasonable for you to compensate for the medical expenses. However, if you deny that it is the pet factor, the other party must provide corresponding evidence to prove it, otherwise, your liability for compensation can be appropriately reduced.

Regarding the loss of work pay, she needs to provide proof of relevant wages, and proof of the actual reduction of income after the accident, otherwise the court will not support it, and similarly, nutrition expenses and the like, you also need to provide proof, according to the situation you described, the loss of work will be mediated for a maximum of about 15 days.

Obviously, both parties are at fault, but judging from the description of the landlord, it seems that the other party's fault is greater, and the result is likely to be that the other party bears most of the responsibility. The requirement for compensation of 3 months' wages is obviously problematic, and if it is a traffic accident, it is necessary to compensate for lost time pay, but the standard and time for determining lost time pay are not 2,000 per month for 3 months, and even if you go to the court, the other party must provide evidence. Even if such a large amount of lost time expenses are incurred, both parties should bear the proportion of responsibility, and the other party should bear most of it, and the same is true for medical expenses, which should not be paid in full by you.

This kind of person is on the nose No matter where she falls in love with it, it's good to sue her for medical expenses, and she doesn't have any evidence, so you deny it, she doesn't have enough money to sue you, don't treat him, stink him, don't care about him for medical money in the future, he won't sue you.

Summary. Hello, glad to answer for you. <>

I would like to inquire about the law, it is not illegal to grow a beard, and it is a citizen's personal right to grow a beard, and the police station has no right. But if you engage in illegal activities under the guise of growing a beard, or even participate in the activities of a terrorist organization, then there are other problems. If you are a law-abiding citizen, no one has the right to prohibit you from wearing a beard.

The beard is determined according to the individual's aesthetics, and we see that there are men from ethnic minorities who have beards, and there is also a kind of people who are engaged in art who are willing to grow beards. <>

I would like to ask you about the law.

Hello, is it illegal to grow a beard? I didn't hang my beard for two or three days due to personal physical reasons, and my face was full of beard, and today I passed by a police station, and an assistant police officer stopped me, and I didn't know if it was the police or the assistant police who said that I didn't shave my beard, and took a photo of my ID, saying that I didn't shave my beard, should I go to the police station with him, and I was helpless before Hu, how should I deal with such incidents?

Hello, glad to answer for you. <>

I would like to consult about the promotion of the law, it is not illegal to grow a beard, it is a citizen's personal right to grow a beard, and the police station has no right. But if you engage in illegal activities or even participate in terrorist organization activities under the guise of a beard in Jane's smile, then there are other problems. If you are a law-abiding citizen, no one has the right to prohibit you from wearing a beard.

The beard is determined according to the individual's aesthetics, and we see that there are men from ethnic minorities who have beards, and there is also a kind of people who are engaged in art who are willing to grow beards. <>

But does this police uncle have the right to ask me to hang up?

Scrape. Dear, the police have no right to ask you to scrape it off. <>

I've been stopped countless times, I'm very undigging, my beard grows too fast, and I can't help it, the length is about two millimeters today, I'm stopped every day, and next time I'm stopped, how should I judge him.

Dear, you can also say to the police that growing a beard is my personal behavior, and the police have no right to restrict people from growing a beard. <>

And get your phone checked for no reason?

Dear, the mobile phone belongs to personal privacy, and the mobile phone will not be checked for no reason. <>

Walking on the street, suddenly the police uncle came to check my mobile phone, was it because I looked too scary or I didn't know anything, several times.

I feel that this kind of behavior is common among the police here, and I wonder why?

Dear, in this case, you can refuse to check your mobile phone by the police uncle, after all, checking your personal mobile phone involves personal privacy, and you need to have relevant authorization documents or you have violated the law before you can check your mobile phone. <>

Dear, which region is it, you can go to the police station to give feedback. <>

Summary. Article 14 of the Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance An employee shall be deemed to have suffered a work-related injury under any of the following circumstances: (1) he or she is injured in an accident during working hours and in the workplace due to work-related reasons; (2) Being injured in an accident while engaging in work-related preparatory or finishing work in the workplace before or after working hours; (3) Suffering violence or other accidental injuries during working hours and in the workplace as a result of performing work duties; (4) Suffering from an occupational disease; (5) During the period when they are away for work, they are injured due to work reasons or their whereabouts are unknown in an accident; (6) Being injured in a traffic accident or an urban rail transit, passenger ferry, or train accident for which they are not primarily responsible while commuting to or from work; (7) Other circumstances that laws and administrative regulations provide shall be recognized as work-related injuries.

Hello, I would like to consult some legal questions.

Hello, is it a work injury for me to turn up the nail cover of my right thumb when I work?

Hello, it is a work injury.

Working hours, place of work, and work-related injuries are considered work-related injuries.

Article 14 of the Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance An employee shall be deemed to have suffered a work-related injury under any of the following circumstances: (1) he or she is injured in an accident during working hours and in the workplace due to work-related reasons; (2) Being injured in an accident while engaging in work-related preparatory or finishing work in the workplace before or after working hours; (3) Suffering violence or other accidental injuries during working hours and in the workplace as a result of performing work duties; (4) Suffering from an occupational disease; (5) During the period when they are away for work, they are injured due to work reasons or their whereabouts are unknown in an accident; (6) Being injured in a traffic accident or an urban rail transit, passenger ferry, or train accident for which they are not primarily responsible while commuting to or from work; (7) Other circumstances that laws and administrative regulations provide shall be recognized as work-related injuries.

Is he at the level of work-related injury?

Belong. As long as it is during working hours, the workplace is classified as a work-related injury because of work-related reasons.