Iron Man VS Batman, a battle of life and death, who is most likely to survive

Batman. It's always the person who sets the position. Why is the Uchiha Itachi's panel strength not particularly powerful, but he has never tasted defeat and jumped to fight monsters?

Because he is the king of Hokage, Kishimoto incarnation. Why is Xiao Feng's strength on paper not very powerful, he is 108,000 miles worse than his two younger brothers, and in the book, there are all kinds of unparalleled, gods block and kill gods and Buddhas, and they have not tasted defeat? Because he is the god of war in this book, he will not fall.

Just compare the characters of Batman and Iron Man. It's not a level, and Iron Man doesn't have any chance of winning if it starts. (If you talk about it separately in the world view of the movie), if these two people are right, the comparison is not who fights at all, but the ability to collect tactical and strategic psychological offensive and defensive information.

The first time Iron Man has the advantage, but even if Batman suddenly encounters Iron Man, he can escape, the second battle that Batman has an infinite advantage, Iron Man's scientific and technological strength is higher than that of Batman, and the high place is energy, this energy is not unique, there are other people who can make it, that Batman can also be made, the upper limit is very high, maybe it can't be compared, then pull to the lower limit, on the level of fighting, combat experience is complete Iron Man, Iron Man management company mostly relies on Little Pepper, Batman is not single-minded in crushing Iron Man, and when the time comes, the two will be worth about the same Batman and can play Iron Man to death, but Batman does not kill, and the lethality is not as lethal as Iron Man who has little scruples, and it must be Batman who survives the final battle, and Iron Man is better than dead, just like other scientists he doesn't care about.

Really, Batman can. After all, Cyborg's technology is very advanced in the multiverse, and Batman injected him with a virus within a week of meeting, and hacked Cyborg. So it's okay to invade Jarvis, Jarvis is abolished, and Iron Man's technology is over.

And Jarvis was once assimilated by Ultron, or when Ultron was born. Brainiac has the most advanced technology in the universe, and the bat computer has resisted the invasion of Brainiac, and it is obvious that Ultron's technology is not as good as Brainianac. In Injustice, a small widget of Batman can disable Lex Luthor's armor, defeating Luthor wearing Superman armor under normal circumstances, so Batman can even burst steel armor with his bare hands.

And that's just a head-to-head showdown. If you play tricks, Batman is the second smartest human in the universe, and his IQ will definitely be able to torture Iron Man to death. So Batman wins.

popularity, even though Rot Downey Jr.'s Iron Man has gained a lot of fans, and Iron Man's fame is firmly in the top ten comic book heroes, but Batman has always been firmly in the first place....The top three are Batman, Spider-Man, and Superman. Let's talk about unreasonable. My country's old fans, most of them are embarrassed to blow black fans, and spraying can spray Iron Man's fans.

And Iron Man fans, most of them are movie fans, and they only know something through movies, but because the old equipment in the Dark Knight trilogy created by Nolan is very "realistic and close to the people", it creates a very weak illusion.

In the comics, I think Batman.

Isn't it a bit too much for you to compare a DC with the second-tier Marvel characters next door?

Batman has a plug-in, the so-called invincible calculation, he said that the screenwriter can come back.

If it's in a recent movie (Shell Bat, Ben Bat), I think Iron Man is amazing.

Iron Man has countless key psychological fluctuations in the comics that eventually lead to the loss of the chain. (Civil War, Avengers vsX Men, Age of Ultron) and even if the lord was attacked the most vulnerable corner of his heart (his parents were killed, see the master of the two parallel worlds), he is still as stable as an old dog and has excellent psychological quality. Except for those who are designed to be the natural enemies of the master, have you ever seen the master fight wits and eat deflated?

The character is like this, there is no need to analyze and infer the specific process, and the iron man must not be able to fight Batman.

In fact, the strength of science and technology....The two of them are not much different, but from the perspective of the identity of a scientist, I think Bruce himself must be worse than Iron Man, and the master relies more on a group of helpers. The Doomsday Bat of the Wayne Group is not done by the master, right, Fenrir plans armor, the most important Red Sun Fist, and is also made by Atomman, I don't know how many scientific ideas and basis the master provides, but the iron man who built the armor in the cave, his own scientific and technological level, and his operation ability, are not too much higher than the master, right? In the same way, I feel that Luthor's ability to operate is better than that of the old man.

The virtual rich list shows that Batman is more than 9 billion and Iron Man is 12.8 billion, at first glance, Iron Man has a lot of money, but in fact, they are both infinitely rich. Some people say that Iron Man's set of armor is 1.5 billion US dollars, and he has 45 sets at home, here you ignore a concept, first of all, the scientific and technological strength of the armor is absolutely worth 1.5 billion, in real life, if someone can study it, I believe 5.1 billion, the Ark nuclear reactor in his chest, you may not be able to get it out if you invest 100 billion, the problem ignored is that as a big arms owner, Iron Man's technology is his own, and the materials are his own. A dragon is their industry, the technology is also their own, even the energy problem has been solved, the electricity cost in the manufacturing process is not a problem, the armor is only a fraction of the huge industry, the armor they make, the actual cost is far less expensive, you see the value of the car, the person who controls the production line is the richest man in the world? The Batman chariot is advanced, it is just an assembly line product of the Wayne Group Arms Department's tank.

In terms of property, the two are tied.

The only possibility is the master. Iron Man does not have the kind of psychological quality to face life and death, and the master will not talk about it, there is no suspense in the face of people who are not false to the big super clown.

The battle between the two heroes, I am more optimistic about Iron Man, Batman only relies on physical skills and a small amount of superpowers, while Iron Man is a combination of modern technology, with its own fire system, and is also equipped with laser devices, especially with a few miniature missiles hidden in the body, especially now Iron Man can be copied in batches, whether it is a heads-up or a group fight against Batman.

The reason why the master doesn't seem to have a high sense of science and technology is mainly because he was born in 1939, limited by the times, people couldn't think of any high-tech products at that time, there was a grappling hook gun, there was a high-tech sports car, it was very awesome, until now, it still maintains this setting, Iron Man was born in the 60s, when technology. Especially the missile technology has developed well, and it's no problem to imagine a flying iron man, and the original Iron Man comics were still very close to the canned man, not as cool as they are now.

It depends on the first few times, life and death. The first time you meet Iron Man, you have an absolute advantage in firepower. And there is no moral limit not to kill.

It's not good to output the master with all his might, but the second time, the iron man just knows what fancy hanging is. EMP plus electromagnetic interference plus super physical skills make iron man canned.

I think I'm Iron Man.

Batman is basically close to hand-to-hand combat, since it is a battle of life and death, Iron Man will hang up as soon as he flies a few shots and throws it over, and Iron Man must win.

Iron Man kills in seconds, not to mention the rest, directly control all the armors to besiege him!

In order to stop the second atrocity of "Little Thanos", Iron Man himself put on gloves and ended the war with "Infinity Snap", erasing the existence of Thanos, and Iron Man himself was squeezed out of his life by the "Infinity Stones".

Iron Man died in Avengers 4: Endgame. An American billionaire and arms manufacturer, with his unique lifestyle and his ingenuity and genius inventors, possess power armor that gives him superhuman strength, superhuman endurance, flight ability, and a variety of **.

"Avengers 4" is not called the "Endgame", this is not only the endgame of Infinity War, but also the ultimate work of Marvel movies.

The biggest tears in the movie should be "The Death of Iron Man", in "Endgame", in order to prevent the second atrocity of "Little Thanos", Iron Man himself put on gloves and ended the war with "Infinite Snap of Fingers", erasing the existence of Thanos, and Iron Man himself was squeezed out of his life by "Infinity Stones".

Iron Man: At that time, Thanos picked up the wireless glove and was about to snap his fingers, but at this moment, Iron Man also rushed up to recapture the Infinity Rough Stone and snapped his fingers with his mortal body, which made Thanos and others disappear from the battlefield. But the powerful *** of the Infinity Rough Stone also took away Iron Man's life, and the picture of Iron Man dying in front of many superheroes in the end also made a lot of fans cry.

The glove with 6 gems bounced to death, and Thanos himself could not withstand the impact of the power of the gems.

Personally, I think Iron Man will win, because Iron Man has more skills, and all of them are ultimate, I personally am more optimistic about Iron Man, and I also like the character of Iron Man.

I think Iron Man will win because I feel like his ** gear will be a little bit better, better than Batman.

I think Iron Man will win, although Batman is very powerful, but it is still a little worse than Iron Man.

Batman. Give Batman time, and Batman can find anyone's shortcomings, such as Babel

Looks like I've seen that picture at Iron Man's Bar, but I can't find it.

This is normal, comic book companies often arrange some superhero smash brawls, Superman vs. Iron Man, Hulk vs. Fantastic Four or something, and the ending of each story is different, in order to avoid plot conflicts between each other.

The comic book company adopts the parallel universe theory, that is, these stories take place in different cosmic planes and are not related to each other.

I think there was a clue to Iron Man's death, first when they traveled to the Space Gem. Tony asks Ant-Man to destroy his energy device, and Thor saves him with a hammer. This confirms that the hammer is a function that can save people.

Then in Avengers One, Loki was captured and the space gem was taken away. However, because the Hulk in 1 ruined their chance to take the Spatial Gem, Loki took the opportunity to take the Gem. This may be the biggest foreshadowing, but whether you die or not is up to the director has the final say.

Iron Man is the main character who doesn't die. And everybody loves it. His mech...

Without Iron Man, Marvel Studios wouldn't be making money.

Yes, the power of the gem was too great, and he had no gloves, and he was mortal, so ah, alas, 08 rose because of him, and 19 because of him.

Spicy Chicken Spicy Chicken Spicy Chicken Spicy Chicken will be considered on the count.

Dead, dead in the end-of-game battle.

Probably not. First of all, there were no bodies at the funeral. Secondly, the only relic energy furnace is still the previous round one, not the triangular one of Avengers 4.