If the house is rough, the landlord s responsibility is related to legal issues

Hello, your father is not responsible for anything.

Your father and the Hunan people are in a house lease contract relationship. Your father's obligations in relation to this contractual relationship include, but are not limited to: providing the tenant with the property agreed in the contract on time; Ensure that the house meets the standards of use; Obligation to repair defects in the house itself; Liability for damages to the tenant or a third party caused by the defects of the premises themselves; Early termination of the lease contract, etc., is not permitted without a statutory reason.

The above obligations are only related to the contractual relationship between your father and the tenant, which is determined by the privity of contract.

The contractual relationship between the lessee (a Hunan native) and a third party has nothing to do with your father, who is not a party to the labor agency relationship. Assuming that the migrant worker is deceived, the migrant worker can only recover compensation from the victim through legal channels.

Moreover, your father does not need and cannot supervise the civil conduct of the tenant; The law protects people in good faith and cannot impose unrealistic obligations on citizens.

For example, if a rental car company rents out a car to a citizen, and the citizen drives the car to rob (or drive the car to transport drugs), do you think the car rental company needs to be held liable? That's certainly not a burden. Quite simply, because it is impossible for a car rental company to send someone to supervise the use of the car 24 hours a day, ideally it can really send someone to supervise, and it also involves issues such as cost, privacy and so on.

The landlord has checked the business website that the company has a legal license.

The obligation has been fulfilled.

Tenants engaging in fraud, etc., are not something that the landlord can anticipate or control.

So the landlord doesn't need to take any responsibility.

The current general view is:

If the tenant violates the law, the landlord will sit together" does not have a realistic basis, and if this logic continues, it will not be the tenant who has committed a crime, and the landlord will have to sit together. "If you want to be a landlord, you must first be a good 007", which is absurd, and naturally it is needless to say.

From this point of view, as long as the landlord has restrained the tenant in advance, filed the use of the rental house and the identity of the tenant in the community, and fulfilled the obligation to inform the neighbors of the rental matter, the landlord's responsibilities and obligations should be fulfilled. In contrast, "the tenant violates the law, and the landlord sits together", and the landlord has to become 007 first, which is obviously an overstep of public power.

The landlord's obligation is to deliver the house to the tenant as agreed, and to keep the leased property in line with the agreed purpose during the lease period, and to fulfill the obligation to repair the house.

If you find out about this situation, you should help the victim to report the crime to the local police station.

If the tenant violates the law, the responsibility shall be borne by the tenant, and the landlord shall not be jointly and severally liable.

From the situation you speak, if the other party violates the law, your father is not responsible.

1.The relationship between the lessor and the lessee is the lease relationship; There are no other rights or obligations;

2.If the lessee is investigated for violations of laws and disciplines, the lessor will not be involved, and the lessor needs to prove that it is not involved in the case or does not know or should know that the lessee's behavior will have a negative impact on society;

3.It is best to go to the police station for the record, the situation after the record is relatively safe, and once there is a problem, the police station will deal with it;

4.A lease contract is necessary, and if there is no lease contract, it is difficult to prove whether the lessor is actively providing illegal business premises for the lessee or passively if there is a problem.

I hope the above points can be used to you again.