Beautiful teacher, come to ask for advice again, thank you!

1. Our school has taken some measures to improve the lives of students.

In "in......"上" should be a noun phrase, while "improve students' lives" is a verbal phrase. There are two ways to change the law: one is to change the word "above" to "aspect", and the other is to add "problem" after "life".

2. There is a small vegetable garden in front of the window, planted with amaranth, beans, cucumbers and many kinds of vegetables.

This sentence commits the mistake of juxtaposing the concept of species and the concept of class, and "amaranth", "bean" and "cucumber" are each a type of vegetable and cannot be juxtaposed with "vegetable". The word "and" should be replaced by the word "etc.", or the word "other" should be inserted before the word "many kinds".

3. Employees or students of the school must present their work permits and student IDs to enter and exit the school.

and "juxtaposed" for adductiveness, and "or" for selective juxtaposition. Employees can only present their work permits, and students can only present their student IDs. Therefore, the word "and" should be replaced by the word "or".

4. He knows very well that once a Chinese person enters the United States and violates American laws and regulations, in addition to the cultural background and language barrier, coupled with the lack of financial resources, he will definitely lose a lawsuit.

I know very well that "belongs to the verb with weak action" and cannot be taken with "pass".

5. Even if the goal of being a superstar cannot be achieved, high-level hobbies can have a more fulfilling life than ordinary people.

"Possession" itself means that the action has been realized, so there is no need to add "".

Our school has taken some steps to improve the lives of our students.

I have a small vegetable garden in front of my window with a variety of vegetables such as celery, beans, cucumbers, etc.

Employees and students of the school must present their work or student ID cards to enter and exit the school.

He knows very well that once Chinese people enter the United States, once they violate the law, in addition to the language barrier, coupled with the lack of funds, they will definitely lose the lawsuit.

Even if the goal of being a superstar cannot be achieved, the high-level hobby can have a more fulfilling life than the average person.

Solution: Using the Pythagorean theorem.

The length of the AB side: 2 +4 Kaifang Potato Xianyan = 2 root number 5BC side length: 1 pie width + 2 Kaifang = root number 5

So, the total amount of steel needed is: 2 + 5 + 3 root number 5 = 7 + 3 root number silver 5 = m).

Next to the sound of mourning ai is "clothes" yi, which belongs to the sound of semi-expression.

According to its phonetic role in the phonetic characters, it can be divided into three categories: the phonetic side, the semi-phonetic side and the non-phonetic phonetic side.

For example, "Huang" plays a phonetic role in all the phonetic characters (such as "Huang, Huang, Locust" and other words) next to the phonetic sound, and mastering the pronunciation of this kind of sound can accurately deduce the pronunciation of all the phonetic words containing the sound.

It can accurately pronounce the sound in some words, but cannot express the sound in the other part of the word or can only express the approximate sound. For example, "捶, hammer, 陲" can accurately pronounce the sound in "捶, hammer, 陲", while in "sleep" (shuì) it can only express similar sounds (rhyme), and in "spit" (tuò) it cannot be pronounced at all (the tone of the voice is different). For this kind of phonetic side, it is especially important to remember the pronunciation of those phonetic words (such as "saliva") that are not read by phonetic side, so as not to mislead the phonetic side.

It is not possible to pronounce sounds at all, or in some words it can only express approximate sounds. For example, "出" has no pronunciation at all in "拙" (zhuō), 茁" (zhuó), 咄 (duō), and 屈" (qū), and has a similar sound in "foundation" (chǔ) and 绌" (chù). All the phonetic characters that contain this kind of sound cannot be pronounced according to the sound side.

Therefore, it is necessary to prevent them from interfering with the pronunciation. When encountering the morphophonetic characters composed of them, you must pay extra attention to avoid mispronunciation.

However, due to the changes in the meaning of ancient characters and modern words, the pronunciation of some words is also different from its sounds, so there will be deviations in the pronunciation of words that rely entirely on shape and sound. For example, if the "hip" part is pronounced as the "temple" part, it will be a joke.

- Beautiful dividing line ---

Who has been to that place? "It doesn't meet Mandarin norms. "Exactly" is an adverb of doubt (adverbs can be divided into:

Adverbs of place, adverbs of manner, adverbs of degree, adverbs of interrogative, and adverbs of conjunction. Obviously, only "who" in the sentence indicates doubt and uncertainty, and "exactly" modifies "who", which should be placed in front of "who". So the Mandarin norm should be "Who has been to that place?"

If the phrase "who" is replaced by a definite person-you, "go" and "didn't go" are uncertain, then "exactly" can modify "go or not". For example: Have you ever been to that place?

In conclusion, "exactly" is an adverb of interrogative, to modify an indeterminate word.

The voice of sad love is the voice of "clothes", righteousness, belonging to the half, next to the voice on the table.

Sound can be divided according to the voice effect, its sound words, the sound next to a table, half of the three types, the sound next to the table, and not the sound next to the table.

The sound of the table next to it is completely pinyin, such as "empire" plays the role of yellow-shaped phonetic characters (such as "phoenix, dry moat, helpless, anxious, yellow, huai" character phonetic mastery, etc.) under the phonetic pronunciation of the phonetic transcription, and the phonetic pronunciation of all phonetic words is accurate in the form of metaphor.

Half of the tableside pinyin is incomplete, and it sounds part of a word, which can be accurately phonetic transcription or the tone can only be approximated in the table, while in another part of the word, cannot. Such as "vertical" (cui) "hammer hammer", the front of accurate speech, while in "sleeping" (water) only approximate sounds (rhyme) in "spit" (tuo) complete speech (syllables). The type of pinyin, especially remembering those who pronounce the form of a phonetic word (such as "spit"), does not pronounce it according to the phonetic alphabet, so it is not sound and misleading.

The sounds of the table next to them will not be phonetic, and some words or sounds can only be approximate. Such as "modest" (卓) Zhuo (卓) 咄 (duo), "曲" (曲) on the basis of the complete pinyin of the deficit (chǔ) deficit "(Chu) in the table "a" approximate sound. The phonetic forms that contain the phonetic words can be pronounced without phonetic transcription, so they need to prevent the disturbing phonetic forms encountered in the pronunciation of such phonetic transcriptions, which are composed of them, and pay more attention to avoid mispronouncing the phonetic sounds.

However, there has been a change in the ancient word-making in the modern sense, and the pronunciation and sound of some words are also different, so there will be deviations if you rely solely on morphophonic literacy. For example, part of a "fashionable", read as "temple" of the treasury, jokes.

- Beautiful dividing line ---

Who the hell has been to that place Mandarin", does not meet the norms. "What" is an adverb of doubt (adverbs can be divided into: adverbs of place, adverbs of mode, adverbs of degree, adverbs of interrogative, adverbs of connection), what words to look at it, it is very clear, only one sentence is said "to express doubt, uncertainty, no matter who", "who" put in front of the Mandarin specification parameters "", should be "who has been to that place?"

If the phrase "who" changes OK - you, "go out" not go "unsure", what is "can be for not go". "For example: didn't you go to a place like this?

In short, "what is the adverb of doubt, beautifying an uncertain word."

The grammar doesn't make sense, and whoever is arbitrarily brought into a person, for example: where have I been? It doesn't make sense. It's okay to put it this way: Have I ever been to that place? Or who has been to that place?

1.I haven't mastered the use of some virtual words.

2.Change: Today, except for others, the two of them watch a movie.

(1) The amount required to buy 5 cartons of milk in Jiuxing shopping mall: 40* yuan);

The amount required to buy 5 cartons of milk at Wynn Mall: 40*(5-1)=160 (yuan);

2) Both malls save money equally.

Jiuxing Mall 40

32 5 = 160 yuan.

Wynn Mall 40 4=160 yuan.

So the two malls are the same.

In Yongxing Shopping Mall, it is a 20% discount, that is, 40 * 5 * 80% = 160If it's a Wynn mall, it's buy four get one free, that is, just buy four boxes, and it's also 160, and these two malls are the same.

Now there are 18 3 6 (people) in each of the three activity rooms

It turns out that A has 6, 4, 10 (people).

It turns out that B has 6, 4, 3, 5 (people).

It turns out that C has 6 3 3 (people).