An easy way to 9 3 14 7 2 3 14 7?

Updated on educate 2024-04-29
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    This problem is calculated using the associative law of multiplication, which is very simple.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    It is easier to use the multiplicative distributive property twice.

    Original = (14+

    14x7+

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    One-two (one.

    II 7 II 7x (15a.

    II. 7 15 15 7 II 105 12.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It can be calculated like this, the easiest way is the original =(

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    =(=To explain: In the end, it is still necessary to form, because the premise of simplicity is that only oral arithmetic is required as much as possible.

    Above, for reference. Thank you!

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    You can calculate first, then , preceded equals, then multiplied, and the final result is equal to.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    With the commutative law of multiplication, the process is as follows.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Solution: Original form.

    One method: use the multiplicative distributive property to achieve simple calculations.

    The formula is: axb-axc=ax(b-c).

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Original = shrink tenfold, expand tenfold, product unchanged,

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Simple basis: multiplicative distributive law.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    You use the following to have **, you take a look.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Easy method, seemingly impossible to apply multiplicative distributive property.

    The inverse of the operation, but careful analysis but careful analysis found that the expansion was ten times, and the 51 was reduced tenfold, which was unchanged. Transform the original formula to, and you will find that this can be used as the inverse of the multiplicative distributive property, (.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    In this problem, multiplying by 2 with the property of product invariance becomes that the product is invariant, then the other multiplier is divided by 2, and the product is unchanged. At this time, the multiplier becomes a sum, and the product can be calculated. Thank you!

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    + Calendar shed extract potato rotten scattered 666] number.

    666x(666x10

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Summary. Dear, the answer is:

    The easy way?

    Kiss, the answer is: seep Zheng Ji Cong socks blind

    Divide by 2.

    Kiss, yes.

    Is that so? Kiss, because you can

    Don't you need parentheses at the end.

    Dear, this is not needed.

    Dear, the answer is:

    That's it.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    It's easy. You turn the equation into.

Related questions
9 answers2024-04-29

Math Easy Calculation Method:

1. Simple calculation using the multiplicative distributive law. >>>More

16 answers2024-04-29

This problem first find the law, 90 can be transformed into 45 2, and then use the extraction common divisor method, extract the common divisor 45, axb+axc=ax(b+c), the 102 and -2 of this problem are complements to each other, you can combine 102-2, and then multiply with 45, the steps are as follows: >>>More

8 answers2024-04-29

Simple calculation, 44 + 68 + 36 32.

Simple calculation idea: If we do simple calculation, we can use the distributive property of multiplication operation or the properties and laws of associative law or division operation to calculate, and get the effect of our simple calculation. If you want to do a simple calculation here, you can try to convert 36 to 40-4, and then use the distributive property of multiplication to calculate. >>>More

13 answers2024-04-29

Easy to calculate. It is a special kind of calculation, which uses the laws of operation and the basic properties of numbers, so as to make the calculation easy, and make a very complex formula easy to calculate the number. >>>More

13 answers2024-04-29

1. Apply the multiplicative distributive law.

Easy to calculate. The multiplicative distributive property refers to: >>>More