Identification and analysis of Chinese sick sentences in senior high school, and problem and analysi

How to answer the wrong questions in high school Chinese? First of all, students need to read through the sentences, with the help of the sense of language to produce a preliminary inventory, let me explain to you the answering skills of the language problem sentence questions.

Distinguishing and analyzing sick sentences is the premise and basis for modifying sick sentences, and only by correctly distinguishing and analyzing sick sentences can we effectively modify and eliminate sick sentences, so as to improve the accuracy of language expression. There are generally three steps to quickly and accurately distinguish the suspicious sentence of the sick town:

1.Read the sentence once or twice, and feel whether the sentence is correct or not, so that the sick sentence is naturally the fastest and most ideal. However, the sick sentences in the college entrance examination questions often have a certain degree of difficulty and are not easy to see, so we must take the next step.

2.Analyze from a grammatical point of view. The reason why grammar comes first, then rhetoric and logic, is because grammatical errors account for the largest proportion of speech disorders.

In addition, even if it is not a grammatical error, analyzing the sentence structure has certain benefits for grasping the meaning of the sentence, so that we can make rhetorical and logical analysis.

3.If there is nothing wrong with the grammar of a sentence, it should be tested from a rhetorical and logical point of view, mainly to see whether it is factual and reasonable.

Some sentences have long object parts, and the echo with the previous component is often ignored later, resulting in the object being mutilated. This phenomenon is common in college entrance examination questions in recent years, and it should attract our attention.

1. With the continuous progress of society, the value of scientific and technological knowledge has become increasingly apparent, and human beings have entered the ownership of intellectual property rights and the sharing of benefits, and have begun to tilt towards scientific and technological workers.

2. In view of the international rise step by step, the United States, India and other countries have established or increased oil reserves, and China must also establish a national strategic oil reserve system as soon as possible.

Sick sentence review note:

1. When answering the question, we must review the question stem, whether to choose a sentence of "with language disease" or a sentence with "no language disease", and clarify the sentences with four options, "with language disease" or "without language disease".

2. Read through the sentences with full attention, see long sentences, and draw the main stem.

There are three steps to distinguish between sentences:

1. Read. Mobilize language sense to check speech disorders.

2. Mention. Raise the trunk to check the branches and leaves.

3. Analysis. Grammatical infallibility.

1. Understand several common types of sick sentences, especially the 6 types pointed out in the "Examination Instructions": improper word order, improper collocation, incomplete or redundant components, chaotic structure, unclear meaning, and illogical. Be familiar with the usual way of correcting sentences.

2. The purpose of modifying the sick sentence is to make the sentence expression accurate and the sentence clear. When modifying the sentence, the original meaning must be retained, and it must not be changed.

3. Start from a grammatical point of view. Grasp the sentence stem. Whether it is a single sentence or a compound sentence, if you grasp the main stem of the sentence, you will also grasp the basic meaning of the sentence, which is conducive to retaining the original meaning when changing the sentence.

When grasping the trunk, pay attention to identify whether there is something wrong with the trunk, such as whether there are defective components, improper collocation of subject-verb and verb-object, etc.

One of the following sentences without a speech problem is ( ).

a Can we cultivate it?"Four haves"Newcomers are a major matter that has a bearing on the future and destiny of our party and country, and are also the fundamental task of the education front.

b Maintaining a hard and simple style of life is a major issue that has a bearing on whether or not the vast number of cadres can inherit and carry forward the revolutionary traditions.

c Whether the electronics industry can develop rapidly and penetrate widely into all walks of life lies in whether it can accelerate the training and create a group of professional and technical personnel.

d This cultural station has become a place to educate and help backward youth, save and cultivate runaway youth, and has been commended by superiors many times.

Choose C. This is a set of exams"One side and two sides cannot be taken care of"The college entrance examination questions. Item A preceding it"Can it be cultivated?", said later"It is also a fundamental task", then it has become a fundamental task to not be able to cultivate.

Makes the logical mistake of not being able to take care of both sides. Item b is preceded by"Maintain a hard and simple style of life", said later"Whether it can be inherited and carried forward", also made the logical mistake of not being able to take care of both sides. Item d"Rescue and nurture runaway youth"，"Save runaway youth"Yes,"Nurturing runaway youth"It doesn't make sense.

2 One of the following sentences without a language problem is ( )a"Spoken in English.

Delete "with". "With the development of the real estate market and the continuation of commercial housing**" prepositional phrase as an adverbial, resulting in the subject being mutilated.

By ......way" is also a prepositional phrase as an adverbial, and giving back is a predicate Society is the object, and the three have formed a sentence, "giving back to the society by donating money and creating a public welfare" The whole sentence is the subject of a large sentence, so there is no subject defect. Maybe you will ask why there is no need for a subject in a small sentence. In fact, it is not that there is no subject, but that the logical subject is omitted.

"entrepreneur" is the logical subject of the sentence. The omission of the logical subject is not a linguistic disease, but for the sake of conciseness. After the completion of the supplement, it is "entrepreneurs to give back to the society by donating money and creating public welfare, which is not the legal obligation of entrepreneurs, and can be advocated but not compulsory."

There are no grammatical errors in the supplemented sentence, but they are verbose, so "entrepreneur" is omitted.

Just take your question and change it.

By donating, it is not a legal obligation for entrepreneurs. It's a language disease.

Donating money is not a legal obligation for entrepreneurs. There is no speech problem.

It is not a legal obligation for entrepreneurs to give back to society by making donations. There is no speech problem.

Teach you a way. When analyzing sentences, there is no language problem if you can extract the subject-verb-object.

The first sentence "by donation" is an adverbial, and only the legal obligation of not being an entrepreneur remains. Not for the predicate of the entrepreneur is the definite legal obligation is the object. You can find that there is no subject, and the logical subject is not clearly visible, so the subject is mutilated.

The second sentence will be deleted and the subject will be "donation".

The third sentence "giving back to the society by donating" is originally a sentence, the way of donating is an adverbial, according to the method I said, the adverbial can be ignored, then the rest is to give back to the society, giving back is the predicate, the society is the object, and the logical subject has been omitted. The main body of this sentence is to give back to the society, then the sentence "to give back to the society" is the subject, "not" is the predicate, "entrepreneur's" is the definite, and "legal obligation" is the object. After removing the adjective and adverbial, it is not a legal obligation to give back to the society.

There is no grammatical problem with this sentence.

You are very right, the first one is because the preposition "with" is redundant, and there is no subject, so it is wrong. But who passed the word "through" in the second sentence, you didn't take into account, it is the entrepreneur who gives back to the society in this way, so it can be reasonably connected. When you see a question like this in the future, the first thing to consider is not whether the preposition causes the component to be mutilated, but to see if the front and back modify a noun.

Like the first relevant department can not be sustained**.

The development of the real estate market and the continuation of the phenomenon of commercial housing.

Give new life again and again.

Yes, the object of the life factor cannot be modified again and again with a definite, and in addition, the sentence has no subject, and the hot abnormality in the hot means warm, attractive, and the hot abnormal means very attractive, popular, and error-free. Unusually popular means to point out unexpected popularity, if the word is used to indicate that the root-seeking trip is not popular. Obviously, the sentence is trying to express that it is very popular and attractive.

The most terrible harm of word phobia This part, word phobia explains the object of harm, and the most terrible thing is the harm of definite modification, so the most terrible thing about word phobia can be considered as the harm of definite modification, the harm is the subject (definite modifies the subject), according to the structure of subject + predicate + object, the subject hazard should be followed by a predicate, and what is added in this question is that it is not a predicate. The most terrible harm of changing "ly" to "word phobia" is that it may make the teaching behavior of language completely lose its pedagogical meaning and become a subject+predicate+object structure. Let me answer for you that the sentence component "the most terrible word phobia" is a predicate, which is a predicate, and the following "it may completely make the teaching act of the language completely lose its pedagogical significance" is a complete sentence that acts as an object.

4.I understand the same as you, so I won't do it.

5.If the new house buyer and the buyer take this out, it is indeed a bit of a repetitive feeling. This can only be done by excluding a few others. I understand it the same way you do.

Note: The most important thing in judging a sick sentence is to divide the sentence components and write down common mistakes.

It's to remove the word "again and again".