-
Anonymous users2024-02-07Microsoft no longer provides technical support for the 2K system, but it does not affect the use of the 2K system, as long as the use is smooth, there is nothing outdated, and there are still people who use the 98 operating system, and whether your machine is suitable for running the updated operating system and use.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-06Installed dual system,One 2000SP4,One is XPSP1,Both are used,The services that are generally not used are turned off,XP's restoration and desktop special effects are also turned off,Twenty tests were repeated with the optimization master and a minute test,It was found that XP entered the system and used about 20M memory more than 2000,In the optimization master test,XP in processor and memory performance is 1 value point less than 2000 (92 vs. 93), However, when I tested it, I found that this value is easy to fluctuate under 2000, and there is no average value under XP; In graphics card and memory performance, XP is 230 more than 2000 points (1430 vs. 1200). In a one-minute test comparison, the test value xp of integer and floating-point is higher than that of 2000, which is basically 96 to 93, ratio; Memory and hard disk transfer are about the same,Directdraw,2000 is higher than XP,It's 440 vs. 400,,Note,My monitor resolution is set at 1280x960,32-bit color,75Refresh rate。
From the above test, I draw a few conclusions: XP is better than 2000 on graphical rendering, and XP integers are better than 2000 on floating-point operations, but this direcdraw loses to 2000, and I don't understand what this directdraw is? Overall, I think XP is slightly better than the 2000 system.,This is really measured.,Anyway, I can't understand those comparisons on the Internet.,I can only use my own stupid method,,But 2000 has one of the most satisfying things for me is that no matter how the machine dies,Press crtl+alt+del can call out the task manager.,And XP sometimes the task manager itself will not respond.。
Now it's rumored that Microsoft wants to do what XP ** activation, if it really doesn't work, I'll install 2000, I have come into contact with many design institutes and drawing printing studios, and I see that they are using 2000 systems, and I don't see any useful XP, which is why I thought of testing XP and 2000.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-05No. Win2000 is Microsoft's most successful operating system to date.
In office settings and for some old birds is still one of the best options.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-04That's what I use.
win98+,The key is whether you are proficient or not,I don't play games,98 is enough。
Why do you install XP!!
Although I've been playing 2k14 and 2konline2
But I think 2k basketball games are all pretty much the same. >>>More
1.Enter the DOS with the boot disc
2.Copy the command to the C drive. >>>More
Minimum Requirements: Windows Vista, XP, or 2000CPU: Pentium 4 GHz single-core processor or equivalent: 512 MB RAM, Vista requires at least 1GB optical drive >>>More
The difference is as follows: 1k paint has to be a single component, and in layman's terms, it is the original paint + thinner, and then sprayed. >>>More
This is a matter of opinion, my opinion Vista represents the prototype of the next generation of operating systems, you are now using the performance of keeping pace with the times, if you are looking for faster running speed and greater compatibility, then you should continue to use XP but in my opinion Vista has become more and more stable and compatible.