Which is better, Sony NWZ W202, Samsung YP S2 and Apple shuffle

I haven't heard of the three models above, but I've used all three brands.

If the landlord likes a heavy taste, Sony is the first choice, but w202 changes Sony's old taste, focusing on more middle and high tones, listening to female voices is good, but its main selling point is to pull the style, fashion, and convenience. . . If you're after fashion, you can't go wrong with buying it!! **Not expensive 500 either

Apple blindly pursues the outside, but what about the inside? The sound is light. At least I don't like the style, and of course it's even more embarrassing.

To say that Samsung has bad sound quality is a long time ago. Now there is a lot of progress, and it can be compared with Sony on flash memory machines. On the low end, the S2 sound quality is pretty much the best, mainly because the tuning is excellent.

Among these, if you want sound quality, choose W202.

Oh, go pull the wind, it's very cool, I've been pulling it for almost two months, white, it's very smooth to use, the song selection has a zappin function, convenient, there is generally no uncomfortable problem of wearing, unless the head is extraordinarily large, many people think it's a Bluetooth headset, in fact, this nature is the same as Bluetooth, liberate your hands or pockets, and don't worry about connection interruptions, experience, recommended to you.

NWZ-W202 is too popular, people who don't know the goods still think that you will come out with a Bluetooth I use shuffle, it's not bad, it is recommended to buy the second generation, don't come out of the new one, think about it, the color is not good-looking, or the line control, indicating that the headphones are broken and you have to buy the original again. As for the large memory, alas, there are too many songs, and it's hard to find without a screen! There is a problem with the NWZ-W202, that is, the machine may not be suitable for your ears, so if you really decide to buy a Sony, you also need to go to the physical store in advance to try it on, otherwise you will regret it when you buy it!

This is really a bit tangled w202 when you run to wear a very stylish shuffle (I don't know which shuffle you are talking about) in addition to synchronizing songs with itunes at the beginning of a little troublesome or more practical It is recommended that shuffle be low-key.

Buy iPod I use shuffle4 silver It's very convenient Not bad Hehe The first few are entangled in low-key problems shuffle is very low-key I like his low-key feeling Being a human being is also There is no need to be too public. Hehe In fact, the reason for choosing iPod is to pay more attention to the sound quality of the iPod Special pure Sony has more rendering I don't like it The clip movement is also very convenient to clip it casually Oh The latest one is also good You can name the song It's fun And it's very small, Half the volume of the clip, more dexterous, worth a try! Hehe.

The sound quality is good for the former, and the function for the latter is good.

Personally, I am optimistic about the former, and I feel that those new features of shuffle are not very practical.

Ipod shuffle 3 recommended

W202 has been out of stock recently, and the quality of this batch is unstable, if you like it very much, I recommend you wait.

iPod shuffle 3 also has a voice feature that's pretty useful.

I bought both, and the w202 was only sent by Excellence.com today.

Let's be objective.

I think the sound quality is about the same.,W202The bass feels better.,SH3's is more medium (that is, it's not heavy),Just right.。

You have to be professional and listen to what treble is dry. Heavy bass thick those. What about the voice, those truths, I think it's all nonsense. You will know only when you hear it.

iPod shuffle 3 sound quality is average, I advise you not to think about the sound quality first, if you listen to it at night, which low noise!

Sony's sound quality has always been better than iPod, and the new product will naturally not be bad, but the market reaction seems to be ordinary Must sound quality Find Feixin Find Aili and.

The shuffle has the best sound quality, the shuffle and the Sony headphones are very good, the sound quality of the shuffle is better, but it is better than the sony.

iPod is definitely not what some people say has a good appearance and a good brand but not with sound quality.

Sony NWZ-W202 Walkman I haven't heard of this.

Recommend shuffle with good sound quality!

The Internet says that the sound quality of iPods is average ......It is also said that shuffle3 has changed the problem of low noise. Anyway, I don't think shuffle3 has bad sound quality, it's not bad.

Low-end *** is not as good as paying attention to mobile phone listening, and the sound quality has not improved much. The 3-star F3 is relatively bland, the Apple boiled water type, and the Sony NWZ-B172F one-button bass makes the low volume loud. Depending on what type you prefer, low frequencies, bland (balanced).

3 stars and Sony 2 models are more suitable for sports.

It's not good.,It's better to listen to it with your mobile phone than with these.,If you really want it, it's still shuffle.,At least the original little white plug is not bad.。

shuffle doesn't have a screen, the song is anxious to kill you, and the original Xiaobai has so bad sound quality that even the deaf can hear it, so I suggest you think about it first.

Among these models, Apple's sound quality is the worst.,It can be ruled out.。。

Philips,Samsung, Sony, Aioudi, the sound quality of the four is about the same,The style difference is relatively large.。。

Aioudi's high frequency is better, the mid-frequency vocals and low frequency are weaker, and it is more suitable for light **, pop songs in general.

Philips's sound field is relatively large,The vocals and low frequency are also much better than Aioudi,There is a flying sound effect,It's shocking to listen to occasionally.,But it's not suitable to open often.,The head will be dizzy.。。

Samsung's three-frequency balance is very light,Suitable for all kinds of **,But it's not too brilliant.,And Samsung's sound effect is also good.。。

Sony's bass is the best of these models.,The vocals are very textured.,If you only listen to pop songs, there's no doubt that it's Sony.。。

In the end, it depends on what you usually listen to...

The sound quality loves Odi, Philips (the chip is quite good), the sound effect is in love (the bass is more pleasing to people's ears), and the appearance is of course Apple (this is just my opinion).

If I were you, buy the one you like best, listen to the song with a high-quality song file, and pair it with good headphones, that's fine.

I just bought Philips Spark I recommend you to buy it, and with a better headset, it should be good, buy Philips handle.

Prefer B172F if the money is poor. This is the best cost-effective P3.

Online**245 or so. The W252 and W262 are cost-effective. It's just good-looking. Headphones can't be plugged in yet. In fact, the effect is not too bad.

Apple forget it. Don't compare the sound quality with the Sony.

W252 W262 It's a sports line, there is only one sound effect B172F has 2 kinds He has an accent key You can switch It can also change the headphones Apple's is fashionable The sound effect is not as good as Sony's It depends on what type you like I used to be 252 Now it's 262 I feel very sporty The key is that it's more convenient.

Do you want to buy more than 200 ***? Then let's buy Philips! Feixin is not bad and saves power Several of the models you said are discontinued, and it is better to buy new products for digital products, with more functions!

More than 300 recommend to buy Kubi Rubik's Cube C60,500-600 recommend to buy iaduio i9 ,The sound quality of these two machines is not bad,** There are more formats! If you are willing to spend money to buy colorful C4 or Hifiman products, listening to **good** device plays a certain role, and it is also very important to match a good headphone, pure hand, hope!

Both of these are good-looking, but both have their drawbacks.

The disadvantage of iPod is that the sound quality is not enough, and it is enough for friends with low sound quality, especially female friends, and it is beautiful enough.

Sony is a new concept***, it's beautiful, and the sound quality is very good. But it's the problem with the headphones, its headphones can't be replaced, if it's uncomfortable to wear or broken, it's very uncomfortable, right.

The above is a personal point of view, welcome to shoot bricks.

The Walkman boss is Sony.

Apple's shape is more beautiful, or Sony, and the innovation is also good, and the price is more realistic.

iPod sound quality is the most rubbish, Classic is better, if you want to pursue sound quality, don't buy iPod shuffle

Sony, isn't that brain-dead? Designed a monster that doesn't work like this (NWZ-W202). I just bought it less than ten times and went back to repair it...

The designer of Sony NWZ-W202 is absolutely brain-dead...

Apple doesn't have a bass thing, it's more troublesome to lose songs and sony, and the sound quality is definitely sony, and the sound quality is definitely sony, and I've used several sony***, and the effect is very good, and I have also had Apple's because the sound quality is rubbish, and then it was sold at a low price.