Manu Nash comparison, Ginobili and Nash comparison

The people who say Ginobili garbage are unfair in the first place.

Ginobili has been the best No. 6 man in the league.

And Nash is also admirable.

It's been 14 years since I entered the NBA in '96, and it's not easy for a professional league with such a high intensity and high elimination rate in the NBA. And he's been very dedicated to basketball, and at 36 years old, he's faster and more agile than most young guards, which is not an easy task. Someone once asked him why, and he just said that he kept a regular life.

It's easy to say, but it's hard to do, but Nash has been doing it for more than 10 years.

You're going to say their honors: 1 championship ring, 1 2-time MVP MVP. Do you still think they're 2 pieces of garbage?

Please pay tribute to the two veteran players who have been working hard for their team and basketball careers.

Personally, I think Nash is strong. Manu's characteristic is that he twists and breaks like a snail, while Nash's ball-handling breakthrough is also practiced with college tennis and is very skillful, and the two are inseparable in this regard. In terms of scoring means, Manu's layup is good, he can dunk, and his pitching is on par with Nash, Nash can actually dunk, but he doesn't use it in the game, and the layup is also very elegant.

Physically, Nash is fitter, and the defense is not very good for both men, and maybe Manu is stronger. Nash is clearly more accomplished on a personal level, and the MVP is always much better than the best sixth man. From the perspective of the team's role, Nash is the engine of the team, Manu is just the catalyst, and in summary, Nash is stronger.

Manu, Manu can make a fatal blow or score continuously, and Nash's main skill is in assists, Nash needs carriers, and Manu is a thunderous blow when he needs him, and he plays low-key when he has nothing to do with the overall situation.

This one. Personally, I think two people with different positions can't be compared together. It's still okay to analyze them separately:

Nash is a typical fritters-style playmaker, good at playmaking, bringing out the best in other players, and often contributing beautiful stats for double-doubles; And Manu, a typical sixth man, is a microwave-like existence, and he is on the court to score points and score points, so his crazy hard work is also his duty. Everyone's perspective is different, so let's seek common ground while reserving differences.

The two of them are not the same type, Nash is an assist type, while Manu is a more all-round type, each has its own advantages, and I can't think of who is stronger than whom, it's just that Nash is more famous, Manu has a championship, Nash has an MVP, that's all.

It's like who is stronger Kobe Bryant or James, they can't be compared, each has its own characteristics.

Those who say that a player is rubbish, I just want to say, if they are rubbish, how do they get a foothold in the NBA? And how did you become famous? If they are garbage, then I can only say that those who say they are even more garbage, because they can't even play CBA.

There is no way to compare with the different positions, Don't judge the quality of the players with personal preferences, Manu is underrated, but injuries and physical strength are his weaknesses, Nash and Manu are both superstars, but there is no doubt that Nash's achievements are greater

Ginobili is bound to be inferior to Nash.

10 years just won the individual skills championship.

There is nothing to say about this, and it is obvious to all.

Unite the collective and willingly give his teammates n assists.

That's what a superstar looks like.

Ginobili waited for Nash to retire.

He may not be able to get out of the picture.

Manu was a warrior with a sharp blade in his hand, and he killed his enemies bravely; And Nash is a commander, and he gives a sharp blade to the team members, a higher level!

Don't judge the quality of players with personal preferences, Manu is underrated, but injuries and physical strength are his weaknesses, Nash and Manu are both superstars, but there is no doubt that Nash's achievements are greater.

The public says that the public is reasonable, the mother says that the mother is reasonable, the angle of appreciation is different, and the evaluation is naturally different, I think, to say that these two people, regardless of gender, can control the game. Manu's 43 points can also be split into Nash's double-doubles, you say?

The two play in different positions, and it is difficult to compare ......Manu won the championship, Nash didn't, Nash won the regular season MVP, Manu didn't. Manu is the Spurs' best sixth man, and Nash is the Suns' soul ......

Of course, in the international arena, Nash's honor must not be higher than that of Manu...

Support Manu. Ginobili, I personally think that no one in the NBA can compare to Manu except Jordan in terms of left-handed dribbling, and Nash is definitely not as good as him.

First of all, the two of them are not in the same seat. So there's no such thing as whom. And then there's the one I think they're both great. There's nothing high-bottomed.

Ginobili is the best interpretation of the type of bench bandit (best sixth man), and Steve is the team's starting MVP-level vacancy, one can be said to be a swing man, while the other is a bombardment point guard, which is not very comparable Thank you!

Without Manu, there would be no Spurs that were brilliant before, and the style of the two is completely different. I think both of them are stars in the league with high skills and IQs.

No character wipe the best sixth man To put it bluntly, isn't it just a substitute garbage How can a small candle compete with the sun and the moon.

Nash has a little more assists and Ginobili has a better break, after all, the two don't play the same position, so it's hard to compare.

Under normal circumstances, Ginobili would win and have a stronger ability to break through.

If Nash's three-point goal is helped, then Nash will win.

Dude, the question you ask doesn't really mean much, Nash's greatness is that he has a super high basketball IQ, he can combine individual offense and team cooperation, he can make his teammates better and the team stronger.

Ginobili is a pure offensive defender, his job is to score, not to tandem the whole team, he doesn't have the versatility of Nash, he doesn't have the passing and leadership of Nash, but he has better individual offensive ability than Nash.

Therefore, if heads-up should be won by Ginobili, because heads-up is about individual offensive ability, not other aspects of ability, so such a comparison is unfair to Nash.

Ginobili can shoot suddenly, and they are in different positions, so it's still Ginobili heads-up.

It could be Nash. He's the king of lore. Calm on-court performance, and weird dribbling.

Because Nash is a master passer, he can score, he can create good offensive opportunities for his teammates, but he is not as good as Ginobili, and he is not as good as Ginobili, and he is not as good as he is in terms of power and bounce.

Nash is better than Ginobili on the three-point dribble, and Ginobili also has a leg injury.

Ginobili win because Nash is a master passer, can score, can create good offensive opportunities for teammates, but heads-up offensive means are not as good as Ginobili, power and bounce are not as good as him.

It's strange how you would think of putting the two of them together and going head-on, I don't think they can possibly get on top.

This question doesn't make much sense.,They're not a position.。。

If you go heads-up, Manu will win, and he is better than Nash in singles

It's hard to say that Ginobili is too slow.

Nash couldn't make a three-point shot.

Nash it! After all, ginger is still old and spicy!

Nash has been in the league for so many years, and his experience and skills are relatively sophisticated!

So Nash will win!

Ginobili has a better chance of winning, and the Argentine dance moves are not easy to defend!

Iverson and Nash are both leaders of their respective teams, and they are both the best.

1. Iverson's shooting moves are not the most standard, but they definitely suit him. Fast, concise, and high-pointed. Iverson AI's long-range shooting is average, it belongs to the feel type, and the mid-range shooting ability is more than twice as strong as that of three-point shooting, especially the stop-and-go jump shot in the fast break has a considerable accuracy.

He is quite mature in adjusting his feet and shaking before shooting, as well as grasping the timing of his shot.

2. Nash is an excellent leader, with a very high basketball IQ and calm temperament, and perfect court insight. With a wide field of vision, passes the ball to the heart of the enemy, and a good shot, it can attack from any area of the court. Cons:

The defense was rather ethereal and there were a lot of mistakes.

Iverson vs Nash, or the answer has a higher historical status, and there is also a gap in the significance of the times between the two! Iverson's historical status is higher than Nash's, and the answer is epoch-making players, and Nash is not!

Personally, I think Iverson's individual singles ability is stronger, but due to his age, it is not as good as before, and Nash assists much stronger.

Nash Nash is one of the few people who can elevate a team's fighting power in a way that only Chamberlain, Jordan and Johnson have been able to do before. Kidd seems to have a little bit of an interest, too. Iverson, he doesn't have a second scorer around him, but I have a lot of respect for him.

A quarterback, an empty position, and both have different responsibilities.

Of course, the individual soldier ability is AI.

The scoring is Aiqiang Jr., and the passing is Nash.

The two of them play in different ways.

Both are great players, Nash is a standard team player, team-oriented, and despite his ability to score, he rarely scores high points when the team demands it. But Ginobili is the sixth man, and what the team needs is for him to lead the bench players to score, so the more shots you get, the more points you get. So many people right now just like that kind of scoring player, so he thinks Ginobili is better, but I think Nash is greater.

Hehe, I personally like these two selfless players. Their actions are all for the benefit of the team and not for individuals. So I think the two of them are inseparable.

But when it comes to achievement, Nash has two MVPs, while Ginobili has an Olympic gold and bronze medal, four overall titles, and Nash is still working for the overall title. The overall comparison is better than Ginobili. But personally, I think the two are evenly matched.

Let's look at it separately.

Ginobili is definitely better than Nash in the score.

Assists on Nash are definitely better.

In fact, Nash's 2-seat MVP contains more moisture.

When Nash won the MVP, he averaged more than a dozen points per game Compared to other MVPs, he definitely belonged to the bottom, although he led the Suns at that time with a better record.

In fact, MVP is based on the team's record.

But Nash never led the team to the Finals at all, although his style of play is good, but Ginobili is the three carriages of the Spurs, you see what the Spurs are like without Ginobili, look at Ginobili leading the Spurs this season I think the NBA is more important about the scoring ability of the players, and if you can score, there is a team that wants to see Kevin. Martin: I can't do anything but score, so I think it's better than Nash, but Nash is one of the great kinds of players.

Personally, I think that.

The Spurs have a much stronger roster than the Suns.

Xiao Si personally thinks it's too soft, I don't know what will be able to bring the sun to this extent...

Spurs seem to be more of a team.

Nash is the 2-pick MVP assist king, Ginobi is very powerful, but to say great, it's still Nash, a great little magician! Upstairs in the NBA Honor Battle also won the championship What can you say about the personal honor is good You know.

It's a difficult question to answer, first of all, Ginobili helped the Spurs win three championships, while Nash didn't win one, and Manu also won the Olympic title, while Nash didn't. But Nash has won several regular-season MVPs and helped the team win several regular-season championships, something Manu doesn't have. Secondly, Nash is the core of the Suns and Manu is not the core of the team, Nash is greater than Manu in terms of importance to the team.

Personally, I think it's Nash Absolutely Bull B

I think it's Nash, it's pleasing to watch him play, his sharp passing, his high basketball IQ.

Personal opinion

There are races in the task list on the right side of the free drive, so it's good to start.

Isn't it written on the right side of the map, just find those labels.

All three have good tempers, Nash is the best, and Nash is notoriously good-tempered. Duncan University majored in psychology, and is usually quiet and has a calm personality. Nowitsky has a good temper.

Nash and Duncan are in between, and it feels like Duncan is more low-key. Nowitzki in his youth did not evaluate.

Nash and Kidd have their own merits.

Steve Nash was born on February 7, 1974 in Johannesburg, South Africa. Canadian professional basketball player, playing point guard for the Los Angeles Lakers in the NBA.

Steve Nash was drafted by the Suns with the 15th pick in the first round of the 1996 NBA Draft, joined the Mavericks in 1998, returned to the Suns in 2004, won the regular season MVP for two consecutive years, and signed with the Lakers in 2012. He was selected into the 8-time All-Star team, the 3-time All-Star First Team, and won the championship of the 2-time All-Star Skills Competition, and is one of the representative figures of the 96** generation of American professional basketball.

Steve Nash is the ninth player in MLB history to win back-to-back MVP titles among guards, and the first international player to win a regular-season MVP since Olajuwon.

On March 22, 2015, Nash announced his retirement, ending his 19-year career.

Jason Frederick Kidd (born March 23, 1973 in San Francisco, CA) is a former American professional basketball player who plays point guard. He is currently the head coach of the Milwaukee Bucks.

Jason Kidd was drafted by the Dallas Mavericks in the first round No. 2 in 1994, NBA Rookie of the Year in 1995, NBA championship with the Dallas Mavericks in 2011, and retired with the Brooklyn Nets on June 4, 2013.

Jason Kidd has the second-all-time NBA assists total, the second-highest steals all-time, and the third-most triple-doubles all-time. The player era has gone through four teams, including the Mavericks, Suns, Nets, and Knicks. After retiring, he directly served as the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets, creating the history of the fastest changing role of a head coach in NBA history.