Nan Huaijin s tongue really didn t burn out 40

The first floor of the lower does not agree. In fact, what does it matter if Nanshi's tongue burns out or not? Even if it doesn't burn out, what can a hard Bangbang do?

Nanshi once always said: "According to the law, it does not depend on people". Don't be prejudiced against the truth because of human relationships.

Nanshi's works are equal, his real contribution and value are in these books, if you can take some time, really read these books, it is better than anything else.

In my mind, Nanshi is the Bodhisattva who came to the world, and I often have inexplicable respect for Nanshi, but I know that these are all fake, and there is no difference between idolatry. If you really want to be worthy of his old man, just read his books, really practice evidence, be a good person, and do good deeds.

There is no Amitabha Buddha in the south.

Take a good look at Mr. Nan Huaijin's books, his books are deep and shallow. Always look at the new.

Amitabha! Brother! Without great wisdom, without those who are beyond this wisdom, they cannot judge great virtues in vain.

But those who really have great wisdom and can surpass this wisdom will not make such judgments. Because it has nothing to do with our liberation from life and death, and with our spiritual enlightenment. We can modify it a little bit:

Have we seen the inner color dust?

Amitabha! Senior brother, the World-Honored One lived to be eighty years old when he was alive, could it be that the centenarians now are higher than the Buddha's cultivation? These are different causes and effects, different manifestations, not to be confused!

Amitabha! Senior brother, don't take this impermanent body and cling to it as your true self! The true self is formless and phaseless, not born or destroyed, not increased or decreased, with different fate, now different phases!

Senior brother believes that what is also his own karma, there is no mistake! It's just that we are not others, and we cannot understand the realm of others. It's like facing the same mountain, different people, different angles, and you can't cling to what others see from your own perspective!

Hello! Like you, I have read Nanshi's book, but my point of view is different from that of my senior brother, I think that Nanshi is coming to the world as it comes, and the Bodhisattva is coming again. As for age, the Buddha was only in his seventies.

The following is the method of meditation of the wise master for your reference:

5. Those who abandon doubts will have doubts and will not have faith in the Dharma. Faith has no cause, and there is nothing to be gained in the Dharma. For example, if someone enters Baoshan, if he has no hands, he will not be able to take it. However, there are many doubts, and they may not be obstacles, but they are now obstacles.

There are three kinds of doubters: one is doubtful. And to do is to read:

My roots are dull and sinful, and I am not the one who cares? Since this doubt is made, the law will never be issued. If you want to cultivate, don't take yourself lightly, because the good roots of the world are unpredictable.

Both, doubtful teacher. He is so majestic and beautiful, but he has no way, how can he teach me? If you are suspicious, you are an obstacle.

The method of elimination, as stated in the "Mahayana Treatise": If there is gold in the stinky skin, do not abandon the stinky sac because you are greedy for money. The practitioner is also a teacher, although the teacher is not pure, he should also give birth to Buddha.

3. Doubts. People in the world cling to their own hearts, and they cannot believe and act with respect when they receive the law. If the mind is hesitant, the Dharma will not stain the heart.

Why? The meaning of doubt.

There is no Amitabha Buddha in the south.

The realm of the Holy One cannot be inferred by thought. I just heard from the grapevine that the relics were burned, and the tongue was not bad, so I didn't see it with my own eyes. He was still very interested in Buddhism.

He also repeatedly said in his books, including in the open letter of Taihu University Hall, that everyone promoted the Holy Realm, and he was just a storyteller and very modest.

I almost finished reading his book, and I learned a lot, at least in terms of insights.

Self-deception is certainly not, if you look at what he has written, and if you have actually practiced it, you will know that he must have some evidence of true cultivation, and as for the extent to which he has cultivated, we have no right to judge.

Whether or not to preach anything, only when it is burned, the Dharma he preaches will prove that it will not be wrong, it sounds cruel, it will not mislead oneself, there are too many mixed things to learn Buddhism, otherwise why should Buddhist monks be cremated? It's nothing more than proving that what you say is good and making people believe it, it's really sad.

Nan lectured on the importance of empirical evidence in the study of Buddhism, but he repeatedly stressed that he had not attained it. There is no contradiction between the two in the first place. How can empirical evidence and evidence be equated? I don't understand this when I read the book.

Brother, you have a unique opinion. I can actually start from the life expectancy. Give one admiration first!!

But I'll also give you my own opinion: those who have attained the Holy Realm can control their own life and death according to the law of cause and effect.

The body is just a shell, and you can control when you die (for example: if you want to die, you can drive yourself to the wall and end your life), not to mention the great virtues and sages who proved the Fa.

Don't be too attached to the realm of what others have attained, because no matter how much you care, it will not be you who have attained the Tao Fruit. It's better to let him go freely, everything will turn into light smoke, and only he will be at ease, wouldn't he be happy?

Judging from Nanshi's behavior all his life, even if he is not a bodhisattva, at least he is practicing bodhisattva behavior!

What is a Bodhisattva? Bodhisattva is translated from Sanskrittva, and the full name is Bodhisattva, which means "enlightened and sentient". The ancients said that the coffin was closed, let's see how much impact he had on Taiwan and China when he was alive?

How much benefit is it to the promotion of the Dharma? Not to mention, take my city as an example, I like to visit bookstores, the largest local bookstore, books on Buddhism, only Nan Huaijin is put in a counter, a put is many years, from I went to 2005 to see now 8 years, has not changed, or he alone can put a bookcase, let's think about it, in this city, these eight years, how many of his books will be sold? As far as the city is concerned, does he benefit greatly from the promotion of Buddhism?

In this city, in terms of the practical benefits of the great monks, there may be other great people who benefit the most, but in terms of books, it is in this city that he has been most successful in promoting the knowledge of the Dharma. What about a city and the whole country? A leopard can be seen in the tube.

From the perspective of his promotion of traditional culture, especially Buddhism and Zen Buddhism, even if he may not be a bodhisattva, his behavior is 100% bodhisattva behavior, and he explains the "Diamond Sutra", "Lengyan Sutra" and other Buddhist scriptures so easy to understand and penetrate into the masses.

Also, there has long been gossip on the Internet that Nanshi has burned a lot of relics, and it is said that his tongue is not bad, the same as Kumarosh, which shows that he said a good thing in his life, of course, I haven't seen it with my own eyes, and I don't know if there are any eminent monks who have confirmed whether it is a true relic. But one more question: Isn't there no relics to be a great monk?

Who prescribes? That Buddhist scripture says that the Buddha and Bodhisattva must have relics when they pass away? Based on **?

The Dharma is the attainment of Prajna, the attainment of great wisdom, not the attainment of relics! After the Buddha passed away, the relics were left in order to raise confidence in the Dharma and eventually attain great wisdom, not for everyone to cultivate a lot of gems.

Nanshi is the reincarnation of Jin Li Rulai, that is, the famous Vimalaya layman. The old monk Xuyun and the old monk Jinghui have written poems and said that they admired Jin Lizun and came to participate in Jin Li's body with guilt, and after the death of Nanshi, the university hall had announced these details.

Obviously not. The wise man is gone, but the mortal is thorough.

Nan Huaijin is the reincarnation of Venerable Sariputta.

The Si people have passed away to copy, according to the old inheritance.

At the beginning of October 2012, it has been rumored that after the Nanshi Tubi, the head was complete, white as jade, with a large number of relics inside, white and blue.

This one... I should let you know, and Nan Huaijin himself said that the most incomprehensible thing for him is death, so he can't be considered a Buddha, right?

In my opinion, the education method of Nanshi should be similar to that of Shakya and Confucius, both of which are written in the form of lectures, which is easy to understand and is a very effective method.

He's just an ignorant and fearless old man, a man who talks nonsense. How can a person who doesn't even know the meaning of leakage burn relics. What a farce!

Each has its own mouth, each has its own seed, and each has its own fruit.

As Nanshi said, relics are hair and nails, and when those who have attained the Tao are happy, they should leave some sauvenirs for the world, otherwise the three flavors of true fire will turn into light and go away. Of course, this is not something that mere mortals can understand.

On October 2nd, I went to the Bai Hall of Taihu University and visited the incinerator of Mr. Du. Close to the furnace

Son, it's warm. Yesterday, a friend from Taihu DAO University Hall told me that when I collected the relics the day before yesterday, I found that the steel plates of the torches were burned and deformed, and the colorful relics and relics were harvested countless flowers. The great monk said that he had never seen such a complete skull relic, and there were beautiful relics in the skull.

There are countless people from all sides who want to cherish the relics of the teacher, and there are different suggestions, so the secret collection is temporarily sealed. (Mr. Zhu Yongxin).

Just came out today, there are complete skull relics and a lot of colorful relics.

Don't think about how many relics there are (all appearances are vain, apart from all appearances, you will see as they come).

Go read the book written by Nan Huaijin and absorb something that will be useful to you, and then it will be worth it.

The problem is divided into two baibai, neither blind denial nor blind worship of superstition. Whether there is a relics dao is based on the true ** information, or the personal observation.

The key question is not whether Nan Huaijin has relics or not, but when you yourself will be enlightened and enlightened, and only then will you know the true answer. All other answers have no real meaning and cannot distinguish between right and wrong.

Immeasurable merit and immeasurable celestial venerable, blessed life immeasurable celestial.

This one...

Unless he hasn't missed a single glance and read it to tell you well, it's a lie.

Whether there is or not does not affect the great achievements of the elderly's Dharma almsgiving.

Self-cultivation Ask others how much they have It will naturally be announced when the time comes, Nanshi comes and goes freely, self-cultivation is self-satisfied, and if you don't cultivate, you can't do it Nanshi left us the most important things and told us how to do it We just need to be diligent and diligent

Some of the current students of Buddhism are indeed like this, but they don't know the crooked theories they see in **. The other methods, especially Taoism, are very low. You haven't cultivated to any realm yourself, how dare you talk nonsense, I remember that your more famous Buddhist masters now have Jingkong and Nan Huaijin.

In one of his speeches, Master Jingkong said that the immortals of the religion are nothing more than human beings, and of course it is not necessarily what his old man said, although he has it in his book. It may also be added by some Buddhists themselves. It is said that the immortals still cannot escape from the six realms of reincarnation.

However, in a book by Master Nan Huaijin, it is believed that the immortals are equivalent to the Arhat fruit position of the Buddhist family. It belongs to the category of Hinayana Buddhism. Although it is not necessarily true.

If this is the case, then that person is definitely not the true Buddha, Amitabha.

Those who truly study Buddhism attach importance to learning compassion, see through the fame and fortune of the world, and have no self, human appearance, sentient beings, and longevity.

How can you coax yourself?

Friend, do you know, why do you do this? Look here.

The Dafang Guang Buddha Huayan Sutra has made a clear explanation of this: We should be diligent in destroying foreign heresies. Don't let dissent harm all beings.

Why do we need to constantly dispel heresies? It's so that these erroneous theories don't poison sentient beings anymore. It's not that we can't get along with anyone and deliberately go against them, but so that everyone can avoid the harm of evil opinions.

Our purpose is not to debate with our opponents, but to protect those around us from being polluted by evil opinions. ）

Seeing your words, I would like to ask who you are talking about who you are talking about believing in Buddhism.