Pi Rixiu Hu Zeng: Whose point of view do you agree with and why?

Agree with Pi Rixiu. Because he pointed out the role of the Grand Canal in the north-south traffic, affirmed the merits of Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty in digging the Grand Canal, and also pointed out the corruption of his tour of the Jiangdu.

I should agree with any point of view that is more representative and more important.

In Pi Rixiu, in fact, I agree with each of them, and there is nothing against them, because they do not have a particularly wrong view.

I think if you are unified, it should be that he is very tolerant, so he agrees with you.

Well, there are many points of view that I agree with, and we should all do it according to our own choices.

Now I think that the former is better to say these two points of view, which is more conducive to development.

How to say this.,Everyone's education is different.,There are different aspects of the growth environment.,He thinks it's not quite the same.,If you solve it, please give one.,Thank you.。

And then I think that if you agree, you need to give this kind of material to know this opinion.

I have to look at the analysis of any point of view before I make a decision, and of course whoever is right agrees with whom?

There are contradictions between our two views.

Pi Rixiu Hu Zhen's point of view. You can just look at the relevant discussion on the Internet.

The Pirixiu pot is aimed at any joint.

Pi Rixiu Hu Zeng said that if you agree with anyone's point of view, I agree with Pi Rixiu's point of view.

Pi Ri Xiuhu has been to any point of view, and the point you agree with me is a point of view that I don't understand.

Pi Rixiu's "Bianhe Nostalgia". Mr. Pi Lao gave a great affirmation to the move of digging the canal in Erguang. Hu Zeng's "Bianshui" attributed the cause of the fall of the Sui Dynasty to the Erguang Canal, which is wrong.

You must know that there was no peasant uprising during the excavation of the canal, and the national strength of the Sui Dynasty was enough to dig this grand canal running from north to south. Therefore, Hu Zeng's statement is groundless.

In fact, Wen Tianxiang didn't want to die in the end... You go to the history books, and in the end Wen Tianxiang wants to surrender and says... I forgot the specifics...

Actually, I'm quite in favor of these ideas ... But in order to answer the question...

Disagree. Wen Tianxiang's martyrdom not only reflects his patriotic spirit, but also because the rise and fall of the country is the responsibility of the husband, and in the face of the rise and fall of the country, how can he care about personal gains and losses?

Bah, it's really uncomfortable to speak with a conscience, and besides, the Song Dynasty has been corrupted like that, so quickly overthrow it...

Disagree. Are you willing to surrender to the person you hate the most, like killing a robber in your entire family?

The beautiful breeze blows all over the courtyard, and the faint fragrance of Qiao Changsun is dazzling in the evening.

After finishing the work, the farmers hurried home to prepare for dinner, some tables and chairs in the courtyard, and moved the courtyard to eat.

The fragrance wafted throughout the courtyard, picked up the dishes and chopsticks, and happily enjoyed the warm and warm kernel dinner, although there was no food.

The moral of "Ma Shuo" is to express strong indignation at the incumbent's inability to identify talents, destroy and bury talents; At the same time, it also expresses the author's hope that the ruler can identify talents, respect those who have talents, raise them with generosity, and let them exercise their talents to the fullest.

I don't agree with the author's point of view, because if "Maxima" is not discovered by others, you need to find opportunities by yourself, follow Mao Sui, and strive for opportunities by yourself, because opportunities will not be sent to the door by themselves.

Hu Shi's view has its positive side and incorrectness. First of all, I think that China's old culture is not useless, and Chinese culture is inherited from China's 5,000 years of history and gradually accumulated and precipitated. If China's political system is inferior to people, and morality is inferior to people, knowledge is inferior to people, literature is inferior to people, ** is not as good as people, art is not as good as people, and body is not as good as people, then how did China move from an ancient country to the present?

Why did the Chinese erect that they did not let other countries exterminate their ethnic groups earlier? But Hu Shi said that the development of people's thoughts at that time also had a certain role in promoting, seeing the development of the world, China can know its own shortcomings, in order to have some realization, China is not everything good, there are certain drawbacks that need to be greatly improved, the things of the ancestors can not keep up with the pace of society can be abandoned, and there is the essence of the part also needs us to inherit. I don't know if it's good or not, but please see you and laugh.

It is a good idea to ask rulers to have the courage to discover and enable talents.

Ma said that the main argument of the article is that there is Bole in the world, and then there is Maxima. It was necessary to write about it, and there were many talents buried in society at that time. Talent. The reason for the burial is due to the fact that the ruling class does not value talent. And talent is not identified.

Ma said that the author's point of view expressed in this article, at the end of the article, he really does not know Ma also. The author says that Maxima often exists, but Bole does not, and I agree with him.

Disagree, there are many counter-examples, most of them are successful, a rich man said that the most lacking thing for the poor is ambition, ambition can make people get everything.