How to look at learning in advance and learning in depth .

Learning ahead is a positive attitude towards learning, and in-depth learning is based on further improving the basic knowledge after already understanding it. In the subsequent study, it is certain to connect with the knowledge that has been mastered, and the key is whether you can draw inferences or even draw inferences from one case to another on the basis of connection.

Learning in advance allows you to understand what you are learning today in advance. In-depth study is to understand and memorize what you have learned today more deeply. There is an indelible relationship between the two. It's all mutually reinforcing.

Learning ahead of time is before others learn this, we have already learned, learn deeply. It means that you learn more than others, and you know a lot more than others in the same field of knowledge.

I think there is a very different difference between learning in advance and learning in depth, and learning in advance refers to studying in advance so that you can have a certain understanding of the process. On the basis of learning in advance, deep learning is carried out in-depth after the teacher's explanation.

Learn in advance, that is, literally, preview this kind of, first roughly know what you want to learn, in-depth learning is the kind of class teacher gives you an in-depth lecture before you learn.

Learning in advance is to do something, we have to have a preparation in advance, in-depth learning, is our later stage, through our own efforts to learn more deeply.

I think learning in advance should be a rough look at it, but it's not very deep, and in-depth learning means that you may be very slow, but you learn very well.

I think learning in advance is equivalent to pre-studying, which is very helpful for the improvement of our learning, so we must study hard to develop better. No regrets.

I think this is very helpful for the improvement of our self-cultivation, so we must do this in order to develop ourselves better.

Because some parents often ask on the Internet: If their children learn in advance, will they not listen carefully in class? If your child is still very young and has never taken the initiative to learn what interests him, then don't send your child to kindergarten too early, because there is only harm, no good.

Let me tell you a real story from around you.

I have a colleague whose daughter is more than two years old, because of her mother-in-law, she wants to go back to her hometown, and at the same time she gritted her teeth and sent her child to kindergarten. The child went to kindergarten for half a year. Just sick for more than half of the time, others catch a cold and he is infected, others are okay and he gets sick at every turn, and the child is more than two years old, it is the time when parents need more protection, and they are sent to kindergarten prematurely.

It would make him insecure.

It has a very bad impact on the psyche, and may affect the child's excessive attachment to others and excessive search for security throughout his life? Such children are easily pleasing others and have no sense of self.

So, Mom and Dad remember, don't send your child to kindergarten too early.

There is also a situation, if your child is over 6 years old and wants to use the summer vacation time, or other time, is the form of the teacher's lecture, for example: you enroll him in an advanced learning class, or hire a tutor, or teach him knowledge, but the density and intensity of this learning are increased, then I am also firmly opposed to this form, and most school teachers are also opposed.

Because he just experienced a form of learning, anyway, I took a form, I listened to the teacher once, in the end the essence of the core of learning, whether he has experienced it, that is, whether he has really thought in his brain, this is not necessarily, if people have experienced the form once, they are generally unwilling to go through the same form a second time. When the new semester starts for such a child, he will think, oops.

I've heard it all once, come on.

You don't have to listen to the class, what is the result? It backfires, so what kind of advanced learning is recognized? It is the form of children's self-study to learn in advance, and I believe that all school teachers also support it, in fact, isn't this a preview?

Which teacher would object to preview? Moreover, if the child learns the knowledge in advance in the form of self-study, after the start of the new semester, not only will he not listen to the class, but he will be particularly active, because he especially wants to show himself at this time, as long as the teacher asks a question, the child will raise his hand as much as possible to answer.

Hey, I think it's really like this, the premise is that the knowledge is not taught by the teacher in advance, but he learns it by himself in advance. Parents may wish to give this teaching method a try to see if it can surprise you.

Although "early learning" is a beneficial way of tutoring, if students learn knowledge in advance in extracurricular tutoring, they ignore normal learning in school, then it is undoubtedly putting the cart before the horse. Through the use of "advanced learning" in extracurricular tutoring institutions, we can accurately check and fill in the gaps and make up for the weak subjects; On the premise of a solid foundation, you can use extracurricular tutoring to increase the difficulty, be confident in the exam, and get good results. This is a benign learning model, and it also plays a key role in high school learning.

Learning in advance" is a plus. Because in this way, you will be able to lay a good foundation, and you will be able to keep up with your studies in the future, and you will be able to develop a good way of studying, and you will be able to prepare for it, and you will be able to have a comprehensive understanding of what you have learned.

Learning in advance is actually beneficial, and it should be beneficial, because if we study in advance, we can understand this knowledge in advance, and when the teacher talks about it again, the students will understand it more thoroughly.