-
If there is no such provision as a break-up fee in the law, the break-up fee cannot be supported in law. When a relationship breaks down, it is also illegal for one partner to demand a break-up fee from the other in the name of loss of youth. The law does not support it, and it is up to the individual whether the other party is willing to give it or not.
-
I don't think it should be able to be supported, and everything two people do before they get a marriage certificate is their own will, not legally protected by the law.
-
Legally, it seems that there is no breakup fee for one item, and if it is really necessary, it can be resolved through legal procedures.
-
In fact, such a thing will not get any support in law, and it is your love for the two to fall in love together, so it is too unreasonable to break up and ask for money.
-
There is no so-called breakup fee and moral damage fee in law, and without a legal basis, it is impossible to get legal support.
Asking for a break-up fee is against morality and social order and good customs, and the law only protects legitimate creditor-debtor relationships. Therefore, from a legal point of view, if it is not the joint property during the period of cohabitation, or the legal gift relationship, debt and creditor's relationship, etc., it is not legal to ask for a breakup fee after a breakup, especially if you live with a spouse, destroy the court of other people's homes, and then ask for a breakup fee, it is impossible to get the protection of the law.
1. Should alimony still be paid if there is no contact between the mother and child after the separation of the relationship for more than 20 years?
Supporting parents is a traditional virtue of the Chinese nation, and it is also a legal obligation for adult children. The blood relationship between parents and children cannot be dissolved in accordance with the law and the concept of human ethics and morality of public order and good customs, and there is no legal basis for the so-called agreement signed by the two parties to disassociate from the mother-child relationship. The mother can also seek mediation from the relevant authorities and file a lawsuit with the court.
2. Is it okay to fall in love if you are not divorced?
You can't fall in love without a divorce, and the law protects a marriage that has been registered. If you fall in love and live with another person before the divorce, it is a matter of bigamy as defined by law. If the other party proves the existence of a third party before the divorce, it may be in a disadvantageous position, and the other party can demand compensation from the party who has a third party.
It's okay to be in love, but be aware that it may constitute illegal cohabitation or bigamy.
The crime of bigamy refers to the crime constituted by the perpetrator violating the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China by marrying another person when he has a lawful spouse or marrying another person knowing that he or she has a spouse. If a bigamist is aware that he has a spouse and is still married to another person, if he believes that his spouse is dead or believes that he has no spouse relationship with another person and remarries, it does not constitute the crime of bigamy. The person who marries must also know that the other person has a spouse and marry him; If the other party does not know that the other party has a spouse and marries him, it does not constitute the crime of bigamy.
According to article 10 of the Several Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on the Trial by the People's Courts of Cases of Living Together in the Name of Husband and Wife without Marriage Registration, when an illegal cohabitation relationship is dissolved, the income and property acquired jointly by both parties during the period of cohabitation shall be treated as ordinary common property. Before cohabitation, property voluntarily given by one party to the other party may be treated as a gift relationship; Property solicited by one party from the other party may be handled with reference to the spirit of Article (18) of the Supreme People's Court's 84 Fa Ban Zi No. 112 "Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of Civil Policies and Laws".
-
Legal analysis: There is no so-called breakup fee and moral damage fee in law, and without a legal basis, it is impossible to get legal support. Asking for a break-up fee is against morality and social order and good customs, and the law only protects legitimate creditor's rights and debts.
Therefore, from a legal point of view, if it is not the joint property during the period of cohabitation, or the legal gift relationship, debt and creditor's relationship, etc., it is not legal to ask for a breakup fee after the breakup, especially if you live with a spouse, destroy other people's families, and then ask for a breakup fee, it is impossible to get the protection of the law.
Legal basis: "Several Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on the People's Court's Trial of Cases of Living Together in the Name of Husband and Wife without Registering the Marriage Judgment" Article 10: When an illegal cohabitation relationship is dissolved, the income and property acquired jointly by both parties during the period of cohabitation shall be treated as ordinary common property. Before cohabitation, property voluntarily given by one party to the other party may be treated as a gift relationship; Property solicited by one party from the other party may be handled with reference to the spirit of Article (18) of the Supreme People's Court's 84 Fa Ban Zi No. 112 "Yi Mo Kai Qing Jian on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of Civil Policy Laws".
-
Legal analysis: Asking for a break-up fee is against morality and public order and good customs, has no legal basis, and is not supported by law.
Legal basis: "Several Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on the People's Court's Trial of Cases of Living Together in the Name of a Husband and Wife without Marriage Registration" Article 18: When an illegal cohabitation relationship is dissolved, the income and property purchased jointly by both parties during the period of cohabitation shall be treated as ordinary common property. Before cohabitation, property voluntarily given by one party to the other party may be treated as a gift relationship; Property demanded by one party from the other party may be handled in accordance with the spirit of Article (18) of the Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of Civil Policies and Laws, No. 84 Fa Ban Zi No. 112 of the Supreme People's Court. Buried.
Such a person is a criminal, but there is no evidence to prove his guilt. Regardless of whether there is evidence or not, go to the prosecution, let everyone know what kind of person he is, don't ask for such a man, let him be punished, you said that you had no money and were deceived by him, and the law would re-sentence him to alimony. This kind of man dumped his wife with such a despicable means and didn't want to raise children, so he was not as good as a beast. >>>More
Contain. Article 21 of Judicial Interpretation I of the Marriage Law is referred to in Article 21 of the Marriage Law"Alimony", including children's living expenses, education expenses, medical expenses and other expenses. >>>More
The law does not specifically stipulate it, but the Ministry of Public Security's "Provisions on the Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases of Drunk Driving by Public Security Organs (for Trial Implementation)" stipulates that the results of a breath alcohol test can be used as the basis for determining drunk driving. The relevant clauses are as follows: >>>More
The brotherly relationship is an identity relationship and cannot be dissolved. >>>More
1. Write down the full legal name, ID number and address of the borrower and the lender; >>>More