Why do many testers regard automated testing as a powerful asset?

Because automated testing liberates QA from heavy repetitive labor, optimizes testing resources, improves testing efficiency, and plays a positive role in product quality assurance. In addition, it is undoubtedly a QA with the ability to develop automated test scripts, frameworks, and tools to be more competitive.

First of all, we cannot deny the role of automated testing, which is certainly a general direction for the development of software testing in the future. Generally refers to the automation of software testing, software testing is to run the system or application under preset conditions, evaluate the running results, and the preconditions should include normal conditions and abnormal conditions.

Anyone who has ever been a test engineer knows it. Some scenarios with very complex logic are difficult to implement with automation scripts, and even if they are forced, they are very cost-effective because they are too time-consuming and labor-intensive. Therefore, it is more flexible and convenient to use manual testing to perform some strange scenarios, and many problems can be found.

And, it should be clear to those who have worked on testing. The same test task will have very different results if it is handed over to different testers, and the number of bugs found and the quality of the final product will be different.

Therefore, manual testing is not a manual execution of testing, and its more important part should be the test ideas and use case design inspiration, which is often the most difficult, and it is also a place that requires experience accumulation and self-precipitation, not to mention that automation can be replaced. If you don't have a good test case and test ideas, pure ** and tools, it is difficult for a clever woman to cook without rice. Therefore, whether it is automated testing or manual testing, it is just a testing method or a testing tool, and they each have their own services and focus on the field, and there is no distinction between high and low.

And the implementation of automated testing before the need to analyze the software development process, if the software requirements change too frequently, testers need to update the test cases and related test scripts according to the changing requirements, and the maintenance of the script itself is a first-class development process, need to modify, debug, if necessary, but also modify the framework of automated testing, if the cost is not less than the use of its saved test costs, then the automated test is a failure.

Many companies or individuals regard automated testing as a great capital, which is fundamentally due to the supreme worship of the best in China.

Manual vs. automation is just a formality, and the real core is test cases, business models, and test analysis. When the scale of the company's products begins to expand, especially the acceleration of product iteration, can it be tested and verified in time.

Because automated testing is very useful.

Because of this, automation is more difficult in today's technology.

Because you will have your own advantages.

That's of course, it's an experience.

Automation means taking it a step further.

Because a lot of people didn't invent it.

The total correction is a new branch technique, which can liberate labor.

This is because automation is a difficult technology.

These are two very tongue-twisting words. And at first glance it looks like it's the same job. Let me talk about my personal understanding of the two.

For example, one day, a mobile phone company was going to do a UI automation test, so they hired an engineer.

The first thing this engineer needs to do is to set up an automated test environment. In this respect alone, the test engineer and the automation engineer need to do exactly the same. For example, build a complete uiautomator environment.

After that, there will be a difference. Once the environment is set up, the test engineer's main focus will be on writing scripts and executing tests. Automation engineers, on the other hand, focus on how to optimize the uiautomator environment.

For example, we all know that after the case of uiautomator is written, it first needs to be compiled by ant, and then pushed by the adb command, and finally executed. At this point, generally speaking, the test engineer will not do anything to change, but the automation engineer will definitely do a program or batch processing or something to make these steps a one-click and complete thing.

What is Test Automation:

It's a revolution that takes the testing process out of the human effort. A R&D process that has a positive impact on cost control, quality control, backtracking quality and reducing test cycles.

What is automated testing:

A test in which part or all of the test is performed by a machine is called automated testing. This kind of testing does not require the real-time involvement of a human being. At the same time, this kind of testing can be much more expensive than manual testing in small-scale applications.

Automated testing can be seen as part of test automation.

Different engineers, different jobs:

An automation engineer will focus more on the research and development of test tools. The main thing is that the engineer thinks about the problem from a cost perspective. It's more like PM.

Everything he does is to reduce the workload of himself or his team, and to automate and automate the repetitive and regular work as much as possible.

An automated test engineer will focus more on the development of test ** and the analysis of test results. Very interested in the device under test itself. They tend to be perfectionists, looking for high quality and often ignoring cost.

This one is more like a developer.

The introduction of automated testing may lead to an increase in the efficiency of testing efforts, but this is not always a given. Automated testing can indeed improve test efficiency, reduce the number of errors, improve test coverage, and shorten test cycles. However, when implementing automated testing, there are the following factors to consider:

Project requirements: If the requirements and features of the project are relatively stable, automated testing can have a significant effect. However, for projects that are frequently exposed to changes or new features, the implementation of automated testing can take more time and resources.

Test case quality and readability: Writing high-quality, readable test cases is the key to automated testing. Wrong or unclear test cases can cause automated tests to be slow or even not functioning properly.

Automation tools and continuous integration Continuous deployment (CI CD) processes: Automated testing requires the right tools and processes to support it. Without the automation tools or CI CD processes available, the efficiency of testing efforts may not be significantly improved.

Script maintenance and updates: Automated tests need to be maintained and updated regularly to keep test cases accurate and relevant. Without an effective maintenance and update strategy, test scripts can become outdated, reducing testing efficiency.

Personnel skills and training: Implementing automated testing requires testers with the right skills and experience. Without talent, automated testing may not be fully effective.

In summary, while automated testing can improve testing efficiency, in a real-world project, the effect may vary depending on factors such as project requirements, test case quality, tools, and processes. To ensure that automated testing is most effective, companies need to develop the right strategy and plan for the specifics of the project.

1. The test efficiency is different.

Completing the same number of tests allows you to start automation faster, while manual testing takes more time. However, the script development of automated testing takes longer than the development of use cases, including writing scripts, debugging scripts, and maintaining scripts, while manual testing also requires writing, reviewing, and revising test cases, because the use cases are written in more natural language, the time will be less.

2. The resource utilization rate is different.

Automated testing can be used 24/7 in equipment and instrument resources, and manual testing is not comparable in this regard.

3. The reliability of execution is different.

In automated testing, it is reliably executed according to scripts, and the subsequent positioning and replication can be followed by a clear configuration path, while manual testing often leads to test errors due to its own judgment, and some of the problems tested cannot be reproduced. However, the stability of automation is more rigid than its rigidity, and human wisdom is reflected in the jump of thinking, and the scumbag of jumping thinking will lead to difficult positioning in the later stage.

4. The coverage rate is different.

In the same amount of time, starting an automated test can cover more features, while manual testing can only cover a small subset of features. However, the self-provided Liangqing dynamic test is suitable for regression testing, and the functions under development are not cost-effective. Changes to features, requirements, or implementations in development will lead to changes to automation scripts, and features in development are more suitable for manual testing.

The automated testing team is dedicated. An open-source testing tool that checks, invokes, and implements the functionality of web services through SOAP HTTP Load compliance testing. It can quickly help users to test HTTP interfaces, and also supports checking, monitoring, compliance and other functions.

QTP: QTP is the abbreviation of QuickTest Professional, which is an automated testing tool. The purpose of using QTP is to use it to perform repetitive manual potato tests, mainly for regression testing and testing new versions of the same software.

Therefore, you need to think about how you want to test your application before smoldering testing, such as what features, operating steps, input data, and desired output data you want to test.

QuickTest targets GUI applications, including traditional Windows applications, to increasingly popular web applications. It covers most software development techniques, is simple and efficient, and has a reusable feature cover for test cases. These include:

Create tests, insert checkpoints, verify data, enhance tests, run tests, analyze results, maintain tests, and more.