-
Anonymous users2024-02-07The relationship between rights and obligations is consistent and inseparable, and the relationship between the two is an interactive relationship. Without obligations, rights cease to exist; Without rights, there is no need for obligations. At the same time, rights and obligations are guaranteed by power.
As the realization of the rights stipulated by the law, of course, it is inseparable from the fulfillment of obligations; In essence, in this process, it is also the result of the action of power.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-06Viewpoint 1 is correct, viewpoint 2 is unscientific.
No right is absolute or unlimited. Whether it is a macro right or a micro specific right, it can only be operated within a certain limit. While exercising our rights as rights holders, we should also remember that we are also the fulfillers of our obligations, so that we can gain freedom in the sense of meaning.
It can be seen that while emphasizing the awareness of rights, we should also constantly strengthen the sense of obligation to fulfill our responsibilities. Both rights and obligations are limited, and those who exceed the limit of rights will not be protected by the system, and may even constitute "ultra vires" or "abuse of rights", and requiring the obligor to do acts beyond the scope of "obligations" is also prohibited. In terms of the allocation of resources for rights and obligations, it is impossible for the right holder to enjoy social benefits forever and unrestrictedly, and it is impossible for the obligor to bear the disadvantages and damages of the society forever, and the right holder must perform the corresponding obligations when enjoying the rights.
In the unity of the system, there is no right without obligations, and there is no obligation without rights, and the two cannot exist and develop in isolation, and one does not exist, and the other cannot exist.
Not all local rights and duties are equal, with the weak having more obligations than their rights and the strong having more power than their obligations.
Equivalence on aggregates. Legal rights and legal obligations are equivalent in aggregate. First of all, the total amount of legal rights and the total amount of legal obligations in a society are equal.
In a society, no matter how legal rights and legal obligations are distributed, no matter how uneven the legal rights and legal obligations actually enjoyed by each member of the society, and whether the number of legal provisions stipulating rights and obligations is equal, legal rights and legal obligations are always of equal value or equal amount in total. Second, in a specific legal relationship, legal rights and legal obligations are mutually encompassing. The scope of legal rights is the limit of legal obligations, and similarly, the scope of legal obligations is the limits of legal rights.
After all, there is no right answer to this kind of discriminatory question.
Isn't that the title right in the political book? Our teacher also let the writer say.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-05What is the reciprocity of rights and obligations?
-
Anonymous users2024-02-04Constitution of the People's Republic of China
Article 33.
All persons with the nationality of the People's Republic of China are citizens of the People's Republic of China.
All citizens of the People's Republic of China are equal before the law.
The State is arrogant about respecting and protecting human rights.
Citizens enjoy the rights stipulated by the Constitution and the law, and must fulfill the obligations stipulated by the Constitution and the law.
Yes. The fundamental rights of our citizens.
1.The right to equality. >>>More
1. For the storage of flammable, explosive, toxic, corrosive, radioactive and other dangerous goods or perishable goods, the stockist shall explain the nature of the goods and provide relevant information. If the stockist violates the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the custodian may refuse to accept the warehousing and may also take corresponding measures to avoid the occurrence of losses, and the expenses incurred therefrom shall be borne by the stockholder. >>>More
We say: motion is absolute and rest is relative. The key lies in the difference in frame of reference. >>>More
Hello! Rights and obligations are corresponding, and from a legal point of view, it can only be said that there is consistency at the macro level and a balance of legal interests on the whole, rather than a one-to-one correspondence in the legal provisions. >>>More
When we arrived at the Education Bureau, the Education Bureau ignored it and said which school the child was transferred to? He said that you are looking for a school by yourself, Baishizhou Xinghe School in Nanshan District, Shenzhen is going to be demolished, and now our children have no arrangement, and there is no school to study, and I will give a reply after seeing it from the state, thank you.