Volunteer performance Injury and fracture How to divide the responsibilities of multiple parties

Hello! A must have been responsible, because organizing students to go out to perform, whether for profit or not, was beyond his purview and was not part of his performance of his duties. Throughout the event, he was responsible for any accidents that occurred.

What's more, during this period, he still has guardianship responsibilities for students. If a student has an accident, he is responsible.

B supermarkets are also liable. Because it is the beneficiary of the show and one of the organizers of the event.

f's conduct is an enlargement of the harmful result. We will be liable for the part of the loss that is magnified.

If it is not a medical malpractice, there is no responsibility, after all, surgery and ** are risky, and no one dares to guarantee 100% success.

D's guardian also has certain responsibilities and can demand appropriate compensation.

As for the proportion of commitment, it is difficult to have a clear standard. In principle, A and B must be liable, F is liable for the exaggerated loss, and D's guardian makes appropriate compensation. 45% each for A and B, and 10% for D.

First of all, it is certain that even if it is a free performance, the supermarket and the teacher are responsible for the accident of the student.

However, if C's mother discharges C from the hospital, and F claims that he is not looking for the supermarket and the teacher, the supermarket and the teacher are exempted from liability.

As for Student D, I don't think Student D should be held liable unless there is evidence that Student D made mistakes in the course of the performance.

In addition, the problem of surgical failure depends on whether the cause of the failure is medical malpractice, if it is not medical malpractice, for example, due to student C's own reasons, or because F let C discharge from the hospital and missed the best time, the hospital will not be liable. If it is because the hospital has made a mistake in the surgical process, the hospital must be held responsible, and the supermarket and the teacher are not responsible.

The main responsibility lies with the teacher, who has to receive administrative sanctions. There is also the supermarket that is also mainly responsible, and he has to pay. In your situation, you need to adjust, and the relationship is complicated.

It's best to ask a local lawyer, he will tell you how to do it, and with a legal basis, it's easy to operate. It is best to find an intermediary to mediate, and if the mediation fails, you can only sue to the court. Going to court is not good for the teacher.

Good luck!!!

Student D is primarily responsible for smashing and injuring student C, and the others are jointly and severally liable in a court decision

1 None. 2 None. 3 None. 4 Yes. 5 Yes. The school and the supermarket are responsible for each half.

The boss is fully responsible, because you are an apprentice, many potential safety hazards you can not recognize, if he does not take measures to discharge the hidden dangers in time, the responsibility is all his,,, but, it depends on the severity of your injury, and give the other party some room for relief, after all, we learn from him,

After work, if two employees play in the factory and cause an accidental fracture, the employee should be held responsible, and the unit is not responsible.

As for how to share the responsibilities between the two employees, it needs to be analyzed in light of the specific circumstances such as the course of the incident and the cause of the injury. If the two parties fail to reach an agreement on the allocation of liability and compensation for losses, the dispute can also be resolved through court litigation.

First, the factory is not responsible, and this matter cannot constitute a work-related injury, because the work-related injury can only be constituted if the injury is caused during the work or because of an accidental injury caused by a car accident on the way to and from work. Second:

A and B are both over 18 years old and are already persons with full capacity for civil conduct, and A should have foreseen that such a dangerous act of lifting B high could cause harm to B and himself, but A did not foresee the danger and carried out such a dangerous act, so the injury caused to himself should be borne by A, and B does not bear any legal responsibility.

Both parties are responsible for paying for the medical expenses.

Both the school and the injured party are liable, with the injured party being primarily responsible.

[Article 7] Where schools, kindergartens, or other educational establishments that have obligations to educate, manage, or protect minors in accordance with law, fail to perform relevant obligations within the scope of their duties, causing minors to suffer physical harm, or minors causing physical harm to others, they shall bear responsibility for compensation corresponding to their fault.

Where a third party's infringement causes minors to suffer personal injury, they shall bear responsibility for compensation. Where schools, kindergartens, and other educational institutions are at fault, they shall bear the corresponding supplementary liability for compensation.

As long as it is determined that the injury is minor, he will be detained, and if he is seriously injured, he will be held criminally responsible, and in any case, it is not right to beat someone, and it depends on the reason for the fight, and if there is no reason for the beating, he will be fully responsible. The money must be compensated, depending on the division of responsibility. You can adjust the victim's willingness to be private, you reach an agreement, and you will not be detained or criminally responsible.

Curse your uncle not to go to jail.

Please add a question.

The course of events is not clear, so it is not possible to determine the responsibility of both parties.

Do you use equipment? What is the level of damage? What is the cause of the dispute? Who's going to do it first? Does the management intervene?

These can be used as a basis for determining liability. Ask this friend to add some details.

The victim may demand that the perpetrator bear the corresponding obligation to pay compensation.

Article 17 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases: Where a victim suffers personal injury, the compensation obligor shall compensate for all expenses incurred due to medical treatment** and the loss of income due to lost work, including medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal subsidies, and necessary nutrition expenses.

If the victim is disabled due to injury, the compensation obligor shall also compensate for the necessary expenses incurred by the victim due to the increase in living needs and the loss of income caused by the loss of the ability to work, including disability compensation, disability assistive device expenses, and living expenses for dependents, as well as the necessary expenses, nursing expenses, and follow-up expenses actually incurred due to nursing care and continuation.

Where the victim dies, the compensation obligor shall, in addition to compensating the relevant expenses provided for in the first paragraph of this article on the basis of the circumstances of the rescue, also compensate for the funeral expenses, the living expenses of the dependents, the death compensation expenses, and other reasonable expenses such as transportation expenses, lodging expenses, and lost work expenses incurred by the victim's relatives in handling funeral matters.

Both the company and he are responsible! But it's not on him. Sue him.

The school has the responsibility of supervision, and it is difficult to distinguish the responsibility of the child to compensate the other party's medical expenses!!

Both of them are incapacitated for civil conduct, and the school has the responsibility to supervise, and the responsibility of the other child's is greater.