Is it difficult to build a strategic bomber, and why is it difficult to build a bomber?

One of the reasons why heavy bombers are difficult to manufacture is the investment of money. In the process of military research and development, a lot of money needs to be consumed as a guarantee, and the development process of aircraft is no exception and even relatively more expensive. Taking the heavy strategic bomber as an example, from the initial design to the final successful research and development, the amount of money spent is about 100 million yuan, and such a high cost is something that some countries with relatively weak economic strength cannot afford.

Another reason is the limitation of technology, in modern society countries have a very strong confidentiality system will not easily tell others the relevant data of the aircraft, which requires the aircraft research and development countries to have a strong scientific and technological force as the backing, to solve the difficulties encountered in the research and development process, and through the comparison of relevant data to find the best solution.

In fact, in addition to the economy and technology, a certain amount of patience is required. The process of manufacturing strategic bomber aircraft requires continuous correction of data through test flights, and this process requires hundreds of thousands of man-hours as a guarantee. It takes a lot of manpower, material resources, financial resources, and intelligence to build an airplane, and only when all these conditions are met can you create your own strategic bomber, which is why it is difficult to manufacture.

Strategic bombers are easy to build.

But useful strategic bombers, that is, strategic bombers capable of flying over enemy territory to, are difficult to build.

As for putting on a show at home, boosting the morale of the common people, and fooling the leadership of the strategic bomber, it is easy to build.

It's like a catapult for an aircraft carrier.

It is difficult to build a catapult capable of catapulting modern heavy fighters of both sides.

And a catapult capable of catapulting the J-6 class ultra-light obsolete fighter is easy to build.

Therefore, China's catapult was successfully developed ten years ago, just waiting for the aircraft carrier.

Until now, China has been building glide jump take-off aircraft carriers.

Strategic bombers cost a lot of money, have high technical difficulty, and have a long development cycle! It is necessary to consider the penetration capability and the coordination of cruise missiles.

Poke my avatar and get the resources yourself

<> "Why is it difficult to build a bombing machine?

The first is big: there is no way to increase the size of an aircraft indefinitely. The consequence of the infinite increase is that the weight of the building will eventually crush the aircraft.

But bombers often require an oversized bomb load and an oversized fuel load. If it is not big enough, then it will lose the meaning of actual combat. The second is to carry out a penetration.

In the process of penetrating the defense, the bomber had to face endless blows from the enemy. In this respect, the bomber must be small and lightweight.

So the bomber became a contradictory complex. Failure to balance and make trade-offs will make it difficult for the bomber to form a draft design. Many science fiction model works, the authors of these works tend to add endless ** to a body.

Sometimes when you see such a library-like body, you can't help but ask, do you move?

It's the same with bombers. At present, the mainstream bombers are equipped with about 15 tons of bombs, and any more will sacrifice maneuverability and speed, and if there are few, it will be a bit of a bit of a walk to drop less than 10 tons of bombs after flying thousands of kilometers. Then equilibrium became an important design indicator of the bomber.

It is not difficult to install a piece of equipment on the plane, but it is rare to cancel a piece of equipment.

For example, the country is making big planes. But the bomber is not favored by some people at the moment, because it is really difficult to choose between bombers. It's hard to decide what to add or what to subtract.

Then in this case, it will be difficult to build a bomber. As for Europe, the United States and Russia, they all have a history of building large bombers, and their bombers have undergone actual combat tests, so the choice is relatively easy. In this regard, countries that find bombers difficult will have to build more and use more feelings.