Everyone, help me, I m going to participate in the debate competition, please think about it!

If a person lives for others in this life and only cares about the thoughts and benefits of others, what is the meaning of this life?

It is possible for a person to love others only if he loves himself first, and is it possible for a person to love only others? If he doesn't even pay attention to himself first, who else will he pay attention to? From a practical point of view, in today's society, who would live for the benefit of others?

I don't know how many people live for themselves. Only when a person does not care about the rights and wrongs of society and does not care about the remarks of others can he be truly happy. Conversely, if a person is bent on what others think, will he be happy?

Man himself is a selfish animal, since he is a mortal, he will not have the idea of God, but only the thoughts of ordinary people, so that the happiness he thinks is naturally the happiness of ordinary people, if an ordinary person insists on having the mind of God, will he still be happy? Since God created this kind of selfishness, people have to practice it, so that they can have true happiness. (God's mind is to think only of others without thinking about themselves, and to be excessively selfless).

I think everything has its pros and cons.

How can we ensure that the knowledge of liberal arts and sciences is not confused without separation?

There's something wrong with this debate, but now that you've drawn the square, congratulations.

First of all, this needs to be understood. You don't have to put this into the argument. Becoming a talent is a process and a result. It is the process by which people internalize external knowledge, experience, and other factors into themselves, so as to achieve a state of having the ability to complete a certain task.

Therefore, fundamentally speaking, external opportunities cannot be the key to success, because in the process of becoming talents, it cannot play an internalizing role but can only play a boosting role.

Then, you can start preparing your arguments. Basic steps: 1. What is a teenager, 2

What is success, 3, what is the key, and why is the key. 4. The relationship between success and one's own ability. 5. Don't deny that external opportunities have a role, but it's not the key (it can be reproved).

Attacking and debating a problem can start with an argument. You can follow the points I gave to check the information, enrich the theory, and then ask the other party the following questions: 1. If external opportunities are the key to success, then why can some people seize the opportunity and some people can't seize the opportunity?

2. Whether a person is a talent or whether he can become a talent, what standard is used to measure it. Opportunity? If not, then why can't this crucial thing determine a person's success? 3. What is the role of ability in making people successful, and can the other party do it?

OK, if it's a Beijing style debate tournament, and then a sensational summary, you'll be complete, if you want to be perfect. There's still a lot to be done.

On the one hand, first determine your arguments, first introduce the specific meaning of young talents, and then talk about the benefits of your own ability over external opportunities, do not deny the importance of external opportunities but emphasize that your own ability is more important than external opportunities, and then divide the labor of two people to find the right problem, two people to find the opposite problem, after finding it, discuss it together for a few days, and finally prepare a speculative summary speech, pay attention to the theme of sublimation, and explain clearly the important role of one's own ability in the success of young people, and even social development and national prosperity.

First of all, define the scope of young people, and then how to call it a talent, there must be a standard to be more critical, the external opportunity of the other party must be to fight the objective environment The main defense point is actually the objective environment needs people to seize This depends on ability, and there are many attack points, which can be horizontal Success in various fields; It can also be longitudinal from the success of small things to the success of being a person and so on.