What was the reason for the early causal logic thinking in the West?

The cause of causal logic in the early West was mainly social contradictions, because of the existence of social contradictions, which caused the emergence of causal logic in the West.

I think the reason for the emergence of causal logic thinking in the early days of the West has a lot to do with their knowledge structure at that time, and also has a great causal relationship with the social relations at that time, so we should treat it correctly.

The reason for their logic is probably because of the corpse tide of the early philosophers.

In the early days, the point system was a place that advocated this democratic freedom and then opened up.

This early cause and effect, in fact, this cause and effect is really the thing, that is, Zhongshan has good karma, is it really a past life and this life?

I hope that there are many reasons for the emergence of early English logical thinking, and it is particularly important, and I feel that it is very good.

The emergence of early British logical thinking in the West was a religious process. So a lot of it is mythological, or biblical.

There should be many reasons for the emergence of causal logic thinking in the early West in this specific way, so let's take a look at some Western writings or something.

The early days of the West were also guided by the thinking of the saints.

The reason for the early causal logic thinking was the emergence of philosophy, or the emergence of science and technology.

Was the cause of causal logical thinking in the early West? The reason for this must have been a long time ago, and I think it was because of the development of science.

What is the cause of causal arogenesis in the early West micro-production? What is his reason?

The reason for the emergence of early causal logic thinking in the West was determined by the social environment of their time.

The logical methods for exploring causal connections include the method of seeking similarity, the method of seeking differences, the method of seeking common ground and seeking differences, the method of residualism, and the method of covariance, which are collectively referred to as the "five methods of induction".

1.Convergence method: It is determined whether only one other situation is common in each occasion by examining the occurrence of several occasions of the phenomenon under study, and if so, then there is a causal connection between this common situation and the phenomenon under study.

2.Difference method: It is to determine whether only one other situation is different in these two occasions by examining the two occasions in which the phenomenon under study appears and does not appear, and if so, then there is a causal connection between this difference and the phenomenon under study.

3.Covariant method: It is to determine whether only one situation has changed in several occasions when the phenomenon under study has changed, and if so, then there is a causal relationship between the situation that has changed accordingly and the phenomenon under study.

4.Residuance method: For a composite outcome event (a, b, c), it is known that its relevant factors are within a certain range (a, b, c), and through previous induction, it is known that b explains b, and c explains c, then the remaining a must explain a

5.Seeking common ground while reserving differences and usage: Seeking common ground while reserving differences and using it is also called seeking common ground and seeking differences and usage.

The content of it is that if there is only one common factor in all occasions where a phenomenon under investigation occurs (the group of positive examples), and there is no common factor in all occasions when the phenomenon under investigation does not occur (the group of negative cases), then this common factor is the cause of the phenomenon under investigation. The steps of this method are to find the same twice and find the difference once.

Proposed Mill's Five Laws:

1) the method of agreement2) the method of difference3) the joint method of agreement and difference

4) the method of residue5) the method of concomitant variation

2.Examine the coherence between factors.

3.Statistical data on the factors examined.

4.Through the above methods, the hypothesis of whether there is a causal relationship is proposed. Suppose the following conditions are met:

1) The assumption covers the scope of the proposition, and the scope of coverage cannot be too large or too small;

2) the hypothesis can be confirmed or falsified;

3) logical consistency;

4) Generally in accordance with the discovered principles.

5.Seek evidence to support this hypothesis. However, we infer causality from what we already know, so even if the evidence can prove it, it does not mean that it must be true, but only that the relationship is true to the extent that it is known.

Before this, it was the first time I saw such logic, which is really incomprehensible to ordinary people, which is why ordinary people are still ordinary people.

Excellent people have a different way of thinking and logic than ordinary people.

What kind of way of thinking is causal thinking?

Causal thinking is to first determine what kind of outcome you want, and match the corresponding skills and time according to the result.

This will make it clearer what you lack, what abilities you haven't left or how you need to allocate your time to get the result.

In this way, the sense of purpose will be clearer and it will be easier to achieve the goal.

Before this, I had been confused, entangled, and in the midst of all kinds of anxiety......I think that as long as you do the things at hand well, it will bring you the results you want, but in fact, it is not that you do a good job, and what you have at hand may not bring you the results you want.

That's what the reality is, and it's always been the way to choose and do it, so I decided to change my mind and start over.

In the past, I always thought that listening to lectures, training, and reading books could bring you benefits, but in fact, they were all an expectation in our hearts, and then we completed the formal things, but the results did not bring you much change after doing these things.

It's like being a real estate developer, when you develop a real estate, you also agree on the price at the beginning.

According to the selling price to allocate the cost of building the house, which materials need to be configured to meet the standard within the selling price.

Different thinking, different results.

One more way, one more option.

They are different in terms of understanding of the future, the reasons for behavior, the starting point for taking action, the choice of action path, the attitude towards risk, and the attitude towards other companies. Causal logic and effect logic to the future.

Summary. Hello dear<>

The answer you're looking for: Discuss the logical approach to finding cause and effect as follows; A logical approach to finding causality involves the following steps: Identify the research question:

What is the problem that needs to be clearly studied, and what is the causal relationship that needs to be studied. Determine the research objects and variables: It is necessary to determine the objects and variables of the study, such as the population, objects, behaviors, etc. that need to be studied.

Collection of data and information: It is necessary to collect relevant data and information, such as through questionnaires, observations, etc., or through literature, statistics, etc. Judging the relevance:

It is necessary to determine whether there is a correlation between variables, such as using statistical methods for correlation analysis.

Discuss the logical approach to finding causal relationships.

Hello <>

The answer you're looking for: Discuss the logical approach to finding cause and effect as follows; A logical approach to finding causality involves the following steps: Identify the research question:

What is the problem that needs to be clearly studied, and what is the causal relationship that needs to be studied. Determine the research objects and variables: It is necessary to determine the objects and variables of the study, such as the population, objects, behaviors, etc. that need to be studied.

Collect data and information on trouser sales: It is necessary to collect relevant data and information, such as obtaining data through questionnaires, observations, etc., or obtaining information through literature, statistical data, etc. Judging the relevance:

It is necessary to determine whether there is a pure family relationship between variables, such as using statistical methods for correlation analysis.

Hello dear<>

The extension you are looking for: Determining causality: It is necessary to use the methods of causal reasoning, such as using experimental design, control groups, etc., to determine causality.

Verification of causality: Empirical research is needed to verify causal relationships, such as using methods such as random trial test and regression analysis to verify causal relationships. In conclusion, the logical method of exploring causality requires systematic research design and data analysis to accurately judge the correlation between variables and the causal relationship.

Buddhism often talks about cause and effect, and "cause" refers to what you think, think, and do in this world, which is called "thought". From the thought of karma, the thought of karma, karma is the cause, there is a cause, there will be results. If you understand cause and effect in life, it will be easier to make smarter choices.

But in business, you can't expect every customer to understand cause and effect as well as you, so in the real entrepreneurial process, what can help us get better is causal thinking, which is the principle of pre-effect as I said before.

Of course, we have to understand this cause and effect wisely, and many times, we mix ourselves with the cause and effect of others. Most of the time we always pay attention to our own causes and then look at the corresponding effects of others. In fact, causality is essentially our own cause and effect, and the same is true for others.

Understanding causal thinking will make it easier for us to live wisely, and understanding causal thinking will make it easier for us to have wise entrepreneurship. Of course, when we understand the relationship between their respective causes and effects, we will really not be entangled, once we are not entangled, our hearts will be easy to be determined, once we are sure that a person will not have energy loss when doing things, on the contrary, he can attract more energy in, and finally he will naturally get a better harvest.

Formal logic? Mathematical logic? This statement is just eye-catching, logic is logic, and there is only one kind of cause and effect, whether it is form or mathematics, it is cause and effect.