What if you cooperate with someone to complete something, but the other party is not active?

Now that they have no sense of purpose and have turned their backs on the team, what should they do? He once asked me what to do if several of you formed a team and did a division of labor in order to complete a thing, but because someone could not keep up with everyone's pace for whatever reason, and you were ahead of others, what should you do? My nature is that we're teammates and I have to do it for him.

The elder said that you are wrong to think so. Since you are a team, what you have to do is to fulfill your mission, and yes, do your best to do it. A good team is only possible if everyone in a team has such a mentality.

If you help, or worse, do someone else's job on their behalf, your team has failed, no matter what the outcome. Yes, the same team can communicate with each other and help each other, but this kind of help should never help or replace others to complete other people's work, this is not called teamwork.

There are too many silent people waiting to be stimulated, so don't blame them with a tone of "hate iron doesn't make steel", but motivate them with a tone of "don't regret it". Slowly activate them with the atmosphere, everyone may not lack a sense of collective honor, nor is it utilitarian, bravely pick up a stove in the vast field, all the faint, faint light, will be attracted to it.

Absolutely have zero tolerance, otherwise the lazy will become even worse, and you will be angry, don't ask me why, I have experienced, rest assured that I can't deceive you, your good to them may be worthless, on the other hand, they just look down on you, hehe, society is like this.

You eat a little of her stuff and sing in the dorm room, and the party will be fine? I think you don't have a sense of collective honor, the party has always been a team, it won't be you alone, you already have the idea that you perform well in your heart, the party will be good, this has to be said to be a very selfish behavior, the dormitory is collective, not individual, don't occupy public territory for personal reasons, and express apologies and thanks to roommates when occupying, this is appropriate. Don't take for granted what others do, no one should give selflessly for their own interests at the moment.

I signed up for the school gala, and I sang there, and I sang a high note, so I had to practice singing these days, practicing in the dormitory, and one of my roommates said that I had made a noise with her, and she was there watching ** at the time, and she didn't study. I think I'm singing very well, and I overheard her tell her friend that I was singing in the dormitory and her brain hurt to listen to it, so she should be biased against me, right? I was tired of singing, her mother sent her some snacks, I went over to get some food, she had a reluctant expression, I have been singing for school, she doesn't want our school party to be better, why doesn't she want me to eat something from her, let me sing well?

She's usually quite friendly, why doesn't she have such a sense of collective honor? I'm ashamed of her!

When I signed up for a school sports meeting, only a few male classmates who liked sports registered. The head teacher asked again and again, comforting everyone to do their best, and it's okay if you don't have talent. Still no one said anything.

Everyone was silent, shirking, waiting for another voice Maybe everyone was not interested, maybe it was the powerlessness of their own limited ability, the head teacher was very angry and crumpled the registration form, threw it on the ground, and left. The class was stunned and turned to discuss with the people around them. They all called a classmate to call the head teacher back, and the classmate picked up the report list, and the board book was not full.

First of all, I reported two more, and jokingly coaxed my friends to report. Gradually, more and more people who had been silent before also opened up their mouths to report the project. Me too, I've always been a waitlist mentality, if no one reports, I'll report.

This is related to their sense of responsibility and spirit of cooperation, since they have agreed at the beginning, and then they do not cooperate well, it is obvious that there is no sense of responsibility and no spirit of cooperation. It is also related to the final grades of the whole class, which shows that they can't think about others at all. It has nothing to do with the sense of collective pride.

The highest state of getting along with people is "not knowing what is", that is, everyone gets along together, does not know that there is a other party, seems to be there, does not interfere with each other, and always maintains a particularly appropriate and appropriate distance and tacit understanding.

I'll send you three tricks.

The first plan is to send charcoal in the snow.

Doesn't he always like to steal the limelight, then let him rob, you can deliberately use very important things to let him rob, when he causes trouble, you help him solve it when the boss doesn't know it, let him see your strength, which is also considered to win people's hearts. Note that the greater the trouble, the better you can solve it, and the better the effect.

The second plan is to watch the fire from the other side.

You have to be patient at this time, wait for a "thing that needs to be solved urgently" to happen and no one else can do it in the short term, you offer to resign, you can rest assured, as long as this boss has a little brain, he will not let you go, you find it difficult to find a job, and the boss also finds it difficult to find a successful employee, everyone is each other. Pay attention to the heat, it's not good to do the fake show, the rabbit is anxious and bites, show your helplessness, and show a little indignation at the "white-eyed wolf", don't be too aggressive.

The third plan, the bitter meat plan.

You have to fully mobilize the enthusiasm of the work in a short period of time, recruit a lot of work, with the character of the white-eyed wolf must be yours in the end, you will strive to finish it all night, if your work has particularity, you can do it in the shortest possible time, you understand the shortest meaning, that is, it will exhaust you, and the work is done, you must not rush to retire, the key is here, you have to drag the body to ask the boss for work, your tired state determines the success or failure of this plan, Generally, people with a conscience will talk to you about the work situation, and you can say bad things about the white-eyed wolf like a family chatter. Be careful, don't show disgust and indignation, but reveal sympathy for the white-eyed wolf's initial entry, this move can be seen as elevating your own literacy, and infinitely belittling the white-eyed wolf, but the meaning of the belittling should not be too obvious, and finally reveal to the boss a little bit that you may want to change jobs.

You have to pay attention to the fact that the key to the success or failure of these three strategies is the importance of your job, and every job has its special moments, and you have to add some fuel to the fire at those important moments, you know? The method is given to you, and if you implement it, use your brains and don't set yourself on fire.

Finally, I don't know how long he has been working with you, if it's less than a month, you can bear with it, he just came here and stayed for so long. Grievances should be resolved, not settled.

That's it, just let him do your thing, how big he can do it, but he does, you should check the boss, or not do it well, blame you!

He didn't ask for it, but it was better not to do it, and then he would get bored and leave his job voluntarily, and care so much, why don't he care.

Teach and teach the apprentices well!

Whatever, just do your thing, he can do as much as he can, but you have to check what he does, otherwise you will blame you for not doing a good job!

It's good if he doesn't ask, if he doesn't do it all the time, he will be very annoyed, and he will automatically leave his job, so what do you do, whether he will or not.

If you want to teach the apprentices well, you must also teach them well!

I've met it too, leave him alone. In front of leaders and colleagues, you should praise him for being kind, knowledgeable, and capable (remember, only you and he can scold him face to face, a little damaged), after a long time, he can't stay.

For a person like him, you don't need to point out his badness. Others can also know and believe that others are not stupid.

Then change jobs, just call yourself what you want, and don't worry.

Many people in the workplace are prone to make the mistake of not taking into account the two key elements of "time" and "other people's workload" when accepting a job that they are not familiar with, or professional, or needs to be coordinated by colleagues in other departments, so they will become more impatient when they encounter something that they cannot complete independently, and even blame other colleagues for not cooperating. It's not just a matter of overestimating one's own ability to do the job, and it's easy to blame other colleagues, but it's also a sign of being too reckless and lacking in intelligence.

In fact, when you encounter a task that you are not very familiar with, is not professional, or needs help from others, it is due to two reasons: one is forced by the pressure or instructions of your boss; The second is due to the psychology of one's own heart, or a psychological factor that is anxious to show one's ability. Whatever the reason, we must first face the question of whether we can complete such a task because of the "wrong" pressure and instructions of our superiors, and secondly.

The former requires us to calmly think about whether we should put forward our own ideas and suggestions to our superiors, and such ideas and suggestions should come from the elements of the latter; The latter is that we need to calmly measure the "time", "human resources", "coordination" and "ability" of the task independently.

You walk in the alley, he barks at the dog's house, throws a stone, who is right and who is wrong?