In theoretical physics research, is it appropriate to give credit to the supervisor for the student

Take a look at the article "Elemental Periods and the Causes of Gravitation", what else is there not to understand?

This is outright plagiarism.

This is one of the factors that hinder the progress of science.

Personally, I think that the student's achievements are attributed to the student, and the team is attributed to the team, of course, there is a priority, if the tutor is just to guide, it should be famous from the mentor. The advantage is that the students are successful, the tutor expands his fame, and he will communicate with more students.

The Physical System of the Universe is the ultimate theoretical physics, so what else is there to study? ，

Sometimes, it is enough for the supervisor to provide you with a good research direction or a suitable topic! Do you think your work has anything to do with your mentor?

What does it matter if you can co-publish?

Rather than being opposed by the teacher, it is better to be snatched away by the teacher! Such a teacher is at least Bole!

I think it should depend on the actual situation. There will be mentors who are very helpful, and there will definitely be mentors who don't actually do anything in the name.

Not suitable, it is recommended to go it alone. I have also heard of code farmers who quit their jobs and started their own businesses because they were dissatisfied with their work results and were angry with their bosses.

Ideally, I think the byline of an article should reflect as much as possible the contributions of different authors.

If you feel that you are good, you can drop out of school and conduct research independently. **The list is full of independent authors, don't be too windy.

In society, talent may be the most important, but resources are the most valuable things. This applies not only to social work, but also to scientific research.

I don't know physics, anyway, I do mechanical knowledge mining, and without the guidance provided to me by my teacher, I probably wouldn't be able to graduate now.

It is ridiculous to say that the things made by graduate students are not attributed to their supervisors, and there is no supervisor to guide them to give money and things to do ghost research.

Most of the theoretical research is irrigation, but domestic tutors without teacher ethics like to grab the first author.

It's perfectly fine for you to have your own ideas, practice out of your own pocket, spend your own money to rely on your own prestige, and hang yourself as a corresponding author.

I think if you can do your own research and publish**, you can do it yourself, if not, don't think about it so much.