Autonomous driving that was blown into the sky, do you support it?

Not supportive, not safe, I saw an article some time ago about the first case of an unmanned car fatal car accident in the United States, I believe everyone has noticed. This is the first known fatal car accident since driving more than 100 million kilometers autonomously. What's even more embarrassing is that it is said that this gentleman named Brown also praised Tesla's exquisite self-driving on his Twitter the day before and escaped a car accident, and died the next day due to an autopilot error.

Yes, although we are still far from perfecting and safe autonomous driving, we have to admit that the technology is getting closer to perfection.

No, because autonomous driving is not very mature now, and autonomous driving technology still needs to invest a lot of time and energy in R&D and testing.

No, no one has experimented with it and it has been blown into the sky, how dare people believe it.

Of course, yes, as long as the destination is lost, he will drive autonomously, much stronger than those who drink alcohol and drag racing, at least not so dangerous, if the whole country, all cars are autonomous, only need to enter the destination, and no other operations are required, and there will be no speeding and overloading, a series of problems such as retrograde road rush and lane change.

No, because the sensor cannot ensure 100% accuracy and needs to be fused with high-precision maps.

Not supported. And autonomous driving brings a lot of safety problems, which is not legal. We humans can control cars ourselves, and we don't need to drive ourselves. Autonomous driving, not as good as us driving.

I don't support it, because it's too dangerous for this, and I won't support it, because it's my own life.

I might support it, because it's a good prospect, because there has to be an effort in the world.

Support, hopefully coming out sooner is very much needed for people who don't have the ability to drive, and it can be popularized.

Autonomous driving technology is far from mature, and there are many safety accidents, so I won't support it.

In the tank! Because the machine is more reliable than a human, it will not make mistakes. It can greatly reduce traffic accidents.

Support, unmanned driving for the benefit of mankind!

Strong support, no need to test for a driver's license, more convenient and fast, very much looking forward to the early realization.

Definitely support, free your hands, and facilitate travel.

This era will eventually come, and there is nothing to support or not support.

With the development of intelligent technology, it is only a matter of time before machines replace human driving, and machines will not drive in traffic jams, traffic accidents, or worrying about parking, and of course they will not be ticketed.

Strong support, no need to test for a driver's license.

Yes, why not,

It's not easy to buy a car now, just wait for autonomous driving.

Autonomous driving is graded according to established standards and definitions.

At present, there are two globally recognized classification standards for autonomous driving technology, which are proposed by the National Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the International Society of Automatous Engineers (SAE). China's national standard of "Classification of Automobile Driving Automation" mainly includes the definition of driving automation, the principle of driving automation classification, the elements of driving automation classification, the definition of each level of driving automation, the process and judgment method of driving automation classification, and the technical requirements of each level of driving automation. It is one of the 11 basic standards of China's intelligent networked vehicle standard system, which will provide support for the introduction of laws, regulations and mandatory standards related to autonomous driving in China.

China's current grading standards for autonomous driving.

Cybersecurity software for autonomous vehicles: It is a software developed by BlackBerry to evaluate the problems that arise during the autonomous driving process of automobiles.

According to the British "Daily Mail" on January 15, Canadian software manufacturer BlackBerry released ** cybersecurity software called Jarvis, which is able to identify weaknesses in self-driving car programs and can also be applied to the field of health services and industrial automation.

BlackBerry said it had tested the Jarvis software with Tata Motors Group's Jaguar Land Rover division, with Jaguar Land Rover chief executive saying Jarvis has reduced the time it takes to assess** from 30 days to seven minutes.

BlackBerry announced in September 2017 that it would partner with Delphi Automotive, a leading automotive company, to jointly develop a software operating system for self-driving cars. In early January 2018, BlackBerry signed an agreement with a Chinese web search company to jointly research self-driving car technology. The company also recently signed automotive-related agreements with chipmaker Qualcomm, automotive powerhouse Denso and Ford Motor Co.

As long as it's free, many people should be willing to try Tesla, why don't you dare to drive it?

There's nothing wrong with the saying that technology can change lives.

In today's society one.

The most talked-about automotive dynamics.

It is new energy and unmanned driving.

Relative to the former, the development has advanced by leaps and bounds.

However, the research of unmanned driving technology has reached a bottleneck.

When unmanned technology came along.

The era of hands-free driving is no longer a dream.

But now autonomous driving technology is still in the early stages of development.

It has not yet been widely spread to the automotive field.

And this is one of them. The biggest problem is that some of the choices are automatic.

Let's say your car has a brake problem.

In front of you to the right is a group of people preparing to cross the street.

In front of you on the left is a delivery guy riding an electric car.

What do you do at this time.

Either directly hit and kill the person crossing the road.

Or directly hit and killed the takeaway guy riding an electric car.

You don't have the brakes, you have to make a choice.

Which one will you choose.

This is the problem that autonomous driving technology has to face.

Forks, such as brakes, fail to function, and pedestrians running red lights are ahead.

In the car were two elderly people.

At this point, you will either hit and kill the person who ran the red light.

Or hit the barricade next to it.

But if you hit a barricade, the old man in the car would die.

In this case.

Which side do you want autonomous driving technology to choose?

Machines are different from people.

If the principle of autonomous driving is to ensure the safety of the people in the car.

Then the person outside the car will be killed.

In this way, whether the technology is applicable to society or not.

It became a problem.

If autonomous driving technology is considered first.

Pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles will be killed.

So who would dare to pay for this technology.

Does this technology still exist?

Necessity has also become a problem.

So it was suggested.

Unmanned systems should be in accordance with human ethics and ethics.

to control the car.

But how exactly should this moral ethics be characterized?

It remains to be said.