Does my uncle have the right to freeze my house? 10

Your uncle definitely doesn't have the right to apply for freezing!

From what you said, a private house should be the kind without a real estate certificate, then, according to the property law, such a private house will have a change of property right from the beginning of the continuation, that is, legally speaking, you (including other legal first heirs) have inherited the ownership of the house, and others have no right to dispose of the private house.

If you want to freeze the house, it seems impossible, because if you want to apply to the court to freeze the house, then there are many prerequisites, there must be an effective legal judgment or legally effective documents (such as notarial deeds, relevant ownership confirmations, etc.), but at present, your uncle definitely has nothing in this regard, and the court will not accept his application for freezing.

Your uncle's request is nothing more than to see that the house left by your father is beneficial, and he also wants to get a piece of the pie, as for whether he can get it, you can depend on the actual situation, if it is true that he has paid a lot to your father and has also given favors to your family, then you can give him a little emotionally, but legally speaking, he has no right to apply for freezing.

Uncle doesn't have that right, and there's absolutely no way he's going to make it and you have ownership of the house.

The question is whether your uncle and your father have a direct borrowing relationship, and whether he has any evidence.

If there is a lawsuit after he wins the lawsuit, the court will ask you to repay the money, and it is impossible to apply directly to freeze the house, and it is impossible not to meet the pre-litigation property preservation.

First, how old are you now, and whether you are at least 18 years old.

Second, to inherit your father's property, you must first inherit the debts left by your father.

Thirdly, he does not have the right to freeze your house, but he has the right to let you pay off the debt first and then inherit the property.

ps: The debt must be proved by an IOU, although the verbal promise is legally valid, but it is difficult to provide evidence, if he wants you to repay the money, you have to find evidence yourself

He doesn't have that right!

As long as there is evidence that the current ownership of the house is yours (title deed, your father's will, etc.).

If the state will not take it back, the immediate family can inherit the property, and the state will compensate if it is expropriated.

Food, clothing, medical care, housing, and burial. If the object of the five guarantees is gone, there will be no heirs, and the state has the right to take it back. In addition, you and your uncle are still inferior to your father.

Your dad can inherit it. The fact that you say you support is the Five Guarantees. It's not your share.

According to your train of thought, it won't take many generations to become a big landlord.

Personally, I feel that you have the right to inherit, but if your uncle has parents and brothers, they are the first in line of succession.

There is no right unless there is no heir, and he has not made a will to anyone else.

A: Your house has been seized by the court, and after it is frozen, you should not be the owner of the house yet.

The house was seized by the court. After thawing, it is still the original ownership of the house.

You can live in your own property, but you can't buy or sell it.

Legal basis: Article 178 of the Civil Procedure Law stipulates that compulsory measures shall be taken against the property involved in the case by sealing or freezing the property or place of the person involved in the case to prevent the parties to the case from disposing of or transferring the property.

1. The "Civil Procedure Law" and other laws stipulate that compulsory measures are taken against the property involved in the case by sealing or freezing the property or premises of the persons involved in the case and sealing them on the spot to prevent the parties to the case from disposing of or transferring the property.

2. Therefore, in the case you mentioned, your property can be lived, but you cannot buy, sell, transfer, etc.

OK. Freezing means that you can't go through the transfer formalities so that in the future if you lose the case, you have something to enforce. The ownership and use rights are still yours.

Freezing a property in a legal sense simply restricts your right to buy and sell transactions and mortgages! It doesn't affect your residency! That is, you can live, but you can't buy, sell, and mortgage! Don't know if you're satisfied?

Now it's just the trial stage, you can live, but you can't trade.

If you only have this one place to live, it is unlikely to be enforced. Enforcement also requires the maintenance of the basic livelihood of the person subject to enforcement.

No. Your grandmother has made a will, and the ownership of the house belongs to you.

Tell your aunt and uncle clearly.

If they still make trouble, use the law to defend their rights!

Hope it helps.

The landlord can rest assured that the property of the parties has the right to be distributed, and the will is already very clear. Even if they go to court, they have no right to fight!

There are no rights, as long as you have a will. According to the Inheritance Law, the heir in the will of the decedent is the grandmother, and the heir is your inheritance.

No rights. In China, inheritance rights include statutory inheritance and testamentary succession, and testamentary succession takes precedence over statutory succession.

There is no right, because it is your grandmother's house, and it is also your grandmother's right to give you, and no one can stop it.

The will says that you can't fight if you don't go, and the court can't control it.

According to the law, the estate is owned by the designated heir, and no one else has the right to fight with you.

They decided no, even the court will award it to you, don't worry.

If it's a valid will, you can't argue with it.

Of course not. There is a will, according to the will.

No because she appointed you to inherit her house.

If the will is clearly yours, they don't.

No, if you can't do it, sue them.

No, you can use the law to protect it.

Definitely not, you protect the will.

As long as you write a will, no one can fight for you.

In the event of a dispute over inheritance, the village committee proves that "the grandfather's real estate has nothing to do with the uncle" is not legally valid. Before your grandfather's death, his house property rights have nothing to do with your uncle, but after his death as an heir (except for the confirmed abuse of the decedent), the key depends on whether your grandfather left a will during his lifetime, no, it still has to be handled in accordance with legal procedures.

Your grandfather's will and the tripartite mediation letter are legally binding. According to the inheritance law, your uncle is also the heir.

It is important that your grandfather's will be clear, that is, specifying who the heirs are.

Otherwise, you won't be able to win all the lawsuits.

Your uncle is about your grandfather to support the "Obligation" has nothing to do with this house, don't mix it up. In addition, your family has a mediation letter from the village committee with a seal, and it is "more than three people, including the signature of three people", and now your grandfather has transferred him to your father, which is completely legal, no need to think about it. I wish you a happy holiday".

The transfer of the house to your dad must be approved by your dad's siblings. After the transfer of ownership, it is equivalent to giving the house to your family, which will involve their interests, because the old man's property and his children have a share. But now, as you said, your uncle is not going back.

Because in the process of your father taking money to renovate and expand the new house, your uncle did not raise any objections and thought that he acquiesced. But your uncle funded the original house, and he deserved his share accordingly. Sitting down and talking about him will open his mouth, suggesting that you go through the judicial process to settle it as soon as possible, otherwise he will be entangled.

Hello, buy a house in your name, don't know what the hell? The loan was also repaid by a relative, so couldn't he buy a house in his own name? Unless you are innocent, otherwise, if there is a financial dispute or a loan dispute, the court will definitely use your name to freeze the debt when you can't pay the money, and your relatives will get nothing at that time.

If you buy a house in the name of a relative, then the mortgage is repaid by the relative, but the name is still yours, and the court has the right to freeze your bank card.

Of course, this is the house in your name that may be executed.

At that time, the court had the power to freeze the house, as long as it was in your name.

Hello, because the real estate certificate (real estate certificate) of the house is in your name, if there is a property in your name, the court will warn you to repay the loan in time, if you can't repay it in time, the court will seize a property, I hope my answer will be helpful to you.

It will freeze because the actual buyer is you and not your relative.

There will definitely be rights, as long as it is in your name, legally your property!

The court will freeze because that's the truth.

Explain that the house is in your name and you are the owner. As a result, there is a property dispute, and the court has the right to freeze all the property in your name.

It can be frozen, and that's the biggest drawback of the top name. Hopefully, lessons will be learned in the future.

Here are a few things you need to understand:

1. The actual owner of the house bought in your name is you, and this is the property in your name.

2. If you have a loan dispute, at least you want to explain the situation in front of the judge, and you need evidence.

3. If you can't produce evidence, the real estate certificate in your name and the registration of the real estate bureau are all evidence that you are the owner of the house.

The bank may not care about what is going on with your house, mainly in your name, and if you can't pay it back, you may have to use the house to pay off the debt, and you can't tell.

Your house repair certificate is complete, why freeze it? I think it's estimated that the proof of repairing the house is incomplete.

Do you have the right to freeze your house, why do you want to freeze it, is it within the scope of demolition?

If you want to sell the house, you need to provide the corresponding security, and the people's court agrees to release the seizure, and in addition, you need the consent of the mortgagee before you can sell the house.