The world s perception of Jing Ke and Qin Shi Huang

Jing Ke is indeed a warrior, and he is not brave and strategic, but his vision is limited to individuals, if the landlord wants to listen to the views of the world, then in the people, he is undoubtedly a tragic hero, sacrificing his life for loyalty, without hesitation; According to the folklore, Qin Shi Huang clearly distinguishes between good and evil, and naturally plays the role of a tyrant and villain; In the upper class, although Jing Ke is indeed a hero, the act of assassinating the emperor will obviously not be supported by the upper class, so his comments will naturally not be very good, and some historians criticize him for acting rashly in order to avenge Yan Dan's personal vendetta, and finally harm the people of Yan State.

The folk comment on Qin Shi Huang was that he was a tyrant. There's no doubt about that. At the beginning of the Qin Dynasty, Legalism pursued Legalism, which was a school of thought opposed to Confucianism, which simply meant to exterminate human nature (or not to talk about feelings, iron-faced and selfless) and only care about the efficiency of the results, not to be false, and it was a school that was very efficient, resentful (no one liked any freedom, and a life that was depressed like a machine) and took him as a school, and the promoter was Shang Ying, and ironically he himself eventually became a victim of this system.

Qin Shi Huang was not a good person in the first place, but I doubt that he may not kill more people than Zhu Yuanzhang. The book-burning incident was a serious incident in history that brutalized intellectuals, because the thinking of the Warring States period was so chaotic that it even affected the Qin Empire, which had just been unified by force. Later generations of China have always been an empire ruled by scholars (** was taken by the imperial examination), and these scholars were naturally indignant when they saw their ancestors being so insulted, and scolded the tyrant.

As for ideological unification, to put it well, it promoted unification, on the other hand, it is rare for China's ideological field to be so active in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, and it can be said that the framework has been limited to death.

If I talk about my evaluation, Jing Ke is an assassin. And the so-called assassination is an extraordinary means taken when normal means cannot achieve the goal (Yan can't defeat Qin). In order to take revenge, Yan Dan used Jing Ke.

In the end, the assassination failed, and history could not be changed. Evaluation or anything is self-understanding for the needs of the evaluator in a certain aspect, and the evaluation of others does not have to be taken too seriously.

Jing Ke's assassination of Qin is indeed a feat, but I think he is just a horseman.

It's just a more famous killer in the legend.

How is it possible to annex the Six Nations without ambition???

Qin Shi Huang is a great man and Jing Ke is a second-rate killer at best, and he didn't kill Qin Shi Huang at such a close distance, which is really enough!! In general, one is successful and the other is unsuccessful!! However, Jing Ke's courage is commendable, but I think the courage of Fan Yuzhi, the general of Yan State who died in vain, is even more commendable than him, and of course it is better than him!! 1

Jing Ke is a hero, and Qin Shi Huang has merits.

Jing Ke: Warriors, knowing that they will never return. Courage is commendable, and there is no strategy.

Qin Shi Huang: Brutal. His only achievements were the unification of the six countries, the unification of writing, the measurement of currency, the construction of the Great Wall, the repair of the Afang Palace, and the Lishan Mausoleum.

There are many opinions. One said that Jing Ke's assassination of Qin was a feat, and Jing Ke was a hero. People have always had little affection for Qin Shi Huang, and what he did to burn books and pit Confucianism, set up prisons and torture to suppress the people is not a human matter.

But there are also people who hold the opposite view, thinking that Jing Ke is a personal heroism and a little husband; And Qin Shi Huang unified the six kingdoms. It has made a great contribution to the development of history.

Jing Ke's assassination of Qin is a feat, and Jing Ke is a hero.

If Jing Ke succeeds in killing the King of Qin, Jing Ke will be a historical sinner. Qin Shi Huang was an outstanding ancient emperor who made great contributions to the development of Chinese history by sweeping the world and establishing a unified multi-ethnic state.

The process of history is the joint force of all people, not the role of a certain big man, the historical process is like the Yangtze River, the big man can change the winding route of the Yangtze River, but can not change the result of his eastward flow to the sea. If Qin Shi Huang is assassinated, there will be his heir to unify the six kingdoms.

Even if the assassination of Qin is successful, the Yan State will perish, but it is difficult to say about Qi Chu, but it is possible that Gongzi Fusu will ascend to the throne of the King of Qin and continue to complete the great cause of unification. There is no if, history is irreversible.

Even if Jing Ke's assassination of Qin succeeded, it would be difficult for Qin to change the pace of destroying Wei Chu first and then Yan Qi when Qin had already destroyed Han and Zhao—because Yan was a personal vendetta, and Wei Chu was a real threat. Of course, the duration of the reign of the king will be longer.

After Ying Zheng's death, he had a certain impact on the Six Kingdoms, but it could not change the fate of their downfall. Ying Zheng destroyed the Six Kingdoms and unified China, so after Ying Zheng was assassinated, can the world still be unified? The answer is that the world must be unified, and the six countries will perish, which has nothing to do with whether there is a winning government, Fusu is in power, and the six countries will still be destroyed, this is the inevitability of history, and Prince Yan's vain attempt to prolong his breath by stabbing Qin Gou is purely a dream.

If the Qin State slows down the pace of unification because of this, it is likely that Wei Jieqi will have room to respite, so as to build a permanent alliance, so that it can indeed confront the Qin State, resulting in the unification will not really come.

Heroes refer to people who are brave and brave, and people who have heroic qualities, who are selfless and selfless, who do not hesitate to fight bravely for the interests of the people, and who are admirable. Jing Ke, a person who is affectionate and righteous, in order to repay Prince Yan, he did not hesitate to sacrifice his life in the end. This person can be described as a hero!

What he left us with was "The wind is sluggish and the water is cold, and the strong man will never return once he is gone!" The tragic words. Qin Shi Huang, the man who unified the six countries, can be described as a majestic strategy.

However, he once issued an order to "burn books and pit Confucianism", which showed his unkindness and regarded the people as grass mustard. Heroic words cannot be put on him. He can only carry the crown of the emperor and talk about the lonely king.

But he also has to be praised as "the emperor of the ages". In fact, the truth is also very simple, a hero can never be an emperor, and a person who can be an emperor will never be a hero.

Personal understanding!

Jing Ke is a hero, a well-deserved hero.

Jing Ke is a hero, a well-deserved hero. Qin Shi Huang is a hero, a well-deserved hero.

It can be analyzed from two aspects, first of all, from the perspective of the historical process, Jing Ke is undoubtedly wrong, because feudal unification conforms to the trend of the times, and he tries to break this trend by himself, which is indeed a feeling contrary to the development order of things themselves; But from his personal spiritual point of view, it can be considered that Jing Ke's assassination of Qin is a manifestation of his loyalty and courage, although he knew that he could not do it or that he would definitely die on this trip, but he still went without hesitation, in order to save the precarious Yan Kingdom, this spirit of not fearing death was also highly praised by Mr. Tao Yuanming, but after his failure to assassinate Qin, he also accelerated the demise of Yan Kingdom.

In short, there are mixed reviews of Jing Ke's assassination of Qin in history, and it depends on which aspect you analyze it.

It is better to evaluate Jin Ke than to evaluate Prince Yan Dan.