People who have no descendants are considered unfilial, how can there be so many unfilial people?

It must be unfilial, and it is the greatest unfilial piety! Although there is an explanation that it is the responsibility of future generations to be incomplete, this is not in line with the ideology of mankind for thousands of years.

and objective laws of development. Objectively speaking, the significance of biological reproduction is to make their genes continue to develop and be more widely disseminated, and in this process, natural selection will choose the best and best genes to stay. Therefore, the significance of offspring is at most the continuation and evolution of nature.

Subjectively, children are not only the product of their parents' emotions, but also the hope passed down from their ancestors, and hope needs to be passed down from generation to generation, and hope can never be broken. If a certain generation breaks off for subjective reasons, it can only mean that this person is very selfish!

There are three things about unfilial piety in the ceremony, which is said to be obedient, unrighteous and unrighteous, and unfilial; The family is poor and old, not for Lu Shi, and the second is not filial; Don't marry and have no children, never worship ancestors, and don't be filial. Among the three, no queen is the greatest. Because we want to propagate the "family planning" policy, we have to criticize and write about the argument that "no one will be the greatest" that has always attached importance to "passing on the family lineage." This is a temporary political exploit, and we cannot say that this statement is wrong in the first place.

Because the fundamental spirit of Chinese culture is to imitate the way of heaven and earth, and the infinite reproduction of human beings, that is, the embodiment of imitating the way of heaven and earth. Heaven and earth gave birth to human beings, and human beings should continue to reproduce according to their own nature, and not destroy themselves. If someone does not marry or marry, then, from the perspective of the family, it is to let a certain family be cut off from children and grandchildren, and the family will be able to draw an eternal end.

The thing is not only that, because any person is an intermediary between the ancestors and the descendants, he or she bears the dual responsibilities and obligations of sacrificing ancestors and reproducing offspring, he or she himself does not belong only to himself, and the personal non-marriage and non-marriage leads to the ancestral soul becoming a lonely ghost, and from then on, the lower part of the word "filial piety" disappears, and "filial piety" does not exist. If there were some people in the past who had the idea of preferring sons over daughters, now we can also say that both men and women are people who bear the dual responsibilities and obligations of sacrificing ancestors and reproducing, the difference is that men bear the vertical responsibilities and obligations of their own families, while women bear the horizontal responsibilities and obligations of human beings. The union of man and woman is the reality of human reproduction.

Therefore, celibacy and non-childbearing should never be advocated, which is a manifestation of selfishness and unfilial piety.

To be unsuccessful is to fail to fulfill the responsibility of being a child, that is, to support parents. It's just that people's culture was not high in the past, and they misinterpreted the meaning of the saying that there is no queen to be great, and it is not necessary to have children to be a filial son, but to accompany their parents to chat about family life on a regular basis, of course, it is good to have children to meet the desire of parents to hold their grandchildren.

There are three unfilial pieties, and no queen is great.

1. "There are three unfilial pieties, and no queen is great" means: there are many kinds of unfilial behaviors, and failure to fulfill the responsibilities of future generations is the most unfilial.

2. "There are three unfilial pieties, and no queen is great" comes from "Mencius" in "Lilou Chapter and Sentences". "There are three unfilial pieties, and no queen is great" is what Mencius said when evaluating Shun's marriage, and the complete original words are: "There are three unfilial pieties, and no queen is great, and Shun marries without telling him, and he is without a queen, and the gentleman thinks that he is still suing."

It said: Shun married a wife without telling his parents, and he failed to fulfill his responsibilities as a descendant. The gentleman thinks it's better to tell his parents.

The "no descendants" here does not mean that there are no descendants, but that they have not fulfilled the responsibilities of their descendants.

In this way, there are still more filial piety than unfilial piety, but filial piety belongs to human nature, and there is no report to the frank road section of the ridge, and the unfilial ones have their own wonders, which will be reported or discussed by others, so they feel that there are many people who are not filial.

Parental education issues, such as parents themselves are not filial. The child's surrounding environment is affected, and the parents of the child will get tired of the parents when they compare with the peers around them.

Most of this is not his own willingness, but there are many reasons why he became an unfilial son. There are many reasons for this, and there are many factors, such as conflicts with parents, and this reason is estimated to be unfilial at most, including parents. There are also some hardships and experiences in life, lack of love, etc., which are all possible, but the probability is relatively small.

There are also multiple possibilities. There are too many uncertainties to determine.

Parents spoil their children too much since they were young and do not give love education, so

The world is so big that there are no surprises.

It's not worth paying for a son who doesn't have filial piety, because even if you pay more, he won't see it, and he doesn't know how to feel sorry for you. Not to mention giving you back.

If this son has no filial piety, then it is really a pity that he raised such a son in vain, but it is normal to think about it, because his birth was not voluntary, but the life you gave him, you raised him, and now he is like this, don't worry too much about him, do your own thing, clearly tell him the road in the future, the road after he becomes an adult depends on him to walk, you no longer bear any responsibility, and then let him go through the wind and rain by himself, let him mature himself, Of course, if something big happens, you still need to help within your ability, after all, this is your own child.

If raising an unfilial son really makes the parents very sad, but the son who has worked hard to raise is not filial, the feeling of being a parent is painful. However, some parents and children are willing to give everything for their sons, no matter how unfilial they are. Such an unfilial son is really not worthy of his parents' efforts for him.

Is it worth paying for a son who has no filial piety? If we outsiders want it, of course, it's not worth it. But no matter how sad their parents are, they can't completely turn a blind eye and be hard-hearted.

Moreover, I personally believe that in addition to the reasons why children are not filial to their parents, the parents' incorrect educational philosophy is also one of the inducements.

I don't think it's worth it, because since he has no filial piety to you, or if he is patient, I feel that as a parent, I should also be more derelict in my duty, because after all, it is your own child, so you still need to pay for this account.

A son who has no filial piety is certainly worth paying. Because you have only one son, it is your duty.

First of all, I think that when you say this, it makes me feel that your love for your child is not selfless giving, you want him to be filial to you, and you pay.

First of all, I feel that as parents, we all love our children, and this love is innate. But many people will think that if I raise a child, the child will raise me in the future, this is a natural thing, I pay for you now, and you will pay for me in the future.

In fact, the more parents are like this, the more children will not feel loved, and they will not treat their parents with gratitude. It's like, some time ago, because I wanted to arrange my life according to my own ideas, but my mother wanted me to live according to her ideas, I am in my 30s, and I also have a daughter, so I will definitely not follow the path designed by my mother, I will definitely listen to my own. You might say that your parents are all for your own good.

Yes, this sentence actually hurts the hearts of many children. When my mom said to me, "I'm all for your good," my heart resisted.

When my mom said, "I always think of you from birth to growing up, to studying, to getting married, to having children, scene by scene, like a movie." "I'm going to be very touched by this, but the opening line of the next sentence is:

If you still remember our mother-daughter ......"I went, and I didn't want to talk to her.

Maybe you think that this is unfilial, but in fact, have you really thought about this problem from the perspective of children? If it's really selfless love for children, what should it look like? If you really love your child selflessly, your child will also give you selfless love in return.

is the second point I want to say, filial piety is not educated, but depends on how filial piety to his grandparents. It's what kind of person you are, and what kind of person your child will become. Love must be mutual, and as parents, leading by example is a must.

Filling your home with love is as wise as you can do, you say?

I don't think it's worth it, but for my own children, I think it should be. Patient education, although he does not have much news, but we can still cultivate into a useful talent, although he is not necessarily the best for us, but as long as it is useful to society.

I think it's worth it from the point of view of the greatness of family affection, because after all, it's your own son, but on the other hand, raising children to prevent old age, since your son can't let you have the security of old-age care, I don't think you should pay too much.

Hello to this subject, I personally think that of course it is not worth it, it is just right to use a few sentences that are not very good, the meat bun beats the dog and never returns, and the story of the farmer and the snake, it is better to save some coffin book for yourself.

A son who has no filial piety, I think it is definitely not worth paying, so when such a son is with me, I am definitely unwilling to associate with him.

If you can be sure that this son will not suddenly give birth to filial piety in the future, then you don't need to pay for him anymore, at least keep some money for yourself, your son will definitely not give you a pension, you need to keep money for your own retirement.

Q: What is it worth for a son who has no filial piety? I think it's all the father's, it's definitely not worth it, what the son should say, or the mother's parents, I think it's all mutual, and people's feelings are mutual.

Whether the son is filial or not, family education is very important, the son is not the fault of the father, as for whether it is worth it, it is a matter of opinion.

So what to do, the water is flowing down, and I can only blame myself for not being educated well.