Scientists say there are limits to human beings, and who says there are none? Guess a sports star.

Updated on science 2024-05-08
23 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I think it's Usain Bolt, and the speed of the wind has left behind the limits of what was once called human.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Scientists have put forward two theories as to why the human brain does not seem to be being further developed today, the first of which is that it is influenced by the environment in which we live. Another theory is that the reason why human intelligence has not increased today is because it has been set up, and the people who are set should be the people who created it. Of course, both of the above statements are just speculation, not the truth.

    According to the research results, human intelligence is also acquired through gradual evolution. For example, the brains of Einstein's intelligent scientists, their brain development rate is much higher than this value, so it seems that our IQ may be inexplicably controlled, so who controls our IQ? Scientists have two theories about this issue, the first one is that it may be due to environmental reasons, as the environment we live in is getting worse and worse.

    So we started out with the same IQ as other creatures, but maybe because we were primates, we had an advantage over other creatures, so we evolved relatively quickly. So I just said that our wisdom has evolved step by step, but now, our wisdom is no longer growing, and there seems to be an uneven phenomenon, some people are stupid, some people have medium IQs, and some people are at the bottom of high IQs. There are even fewer IQs close to heaven.

    So far, we know that the people with the highest IQ have Einstein, Hawking, Leonardo da Vinci, etc., although these scientists have high IQs, but the number is not large, and it may not even exceed 100. Speaking of which, you understand that there are almost 7 billion people in the world, but there are not many smart people, and most of them are of medium IQ. That high-IQ gene is in **?

    Scientists have already answered this question a long time ago, and the brain development rate is less than 5, and the brain development rate of a smart scientist like Einstein is much higher than that. From this point of view, our IQ may be controlled.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Maybe aliens are limiting us.

    Although aliens are not necessarily more intelligent than earthlings, aliens who can reach the earth by their own ability are theoretically much more intelligent than earthlings, aliens' appearance is not important, and their way of life and angle of existence are not necessarily the same as earthlings, even if they are similar, but aliens are likely to reproduce three sexes, that is, they need three different genders, and three aliens can give birth to offspring, although this reproduction method is a little troublesome, but the life code is more rigorous, more sophisticated and more complex and changeable. Its own functions are more advanced and powerful, its self-defense and self-immunity are more perfect, and its scope and accuracy of consciousness are wider and more effective than those of earthlings.

    The genes and other contents contained in the three-sex reproduction can be more, more but methodically and closely distributed, and there is a higher level of spiritual consciousness, so as to adapt to the advanced consciousness behavior and goals, and the three-sex reproduction can be more safe and reliable, confidential, and not easy to be cracked or copied, which may be one of the reasons why the "two" earthlings are lower than some kind of "aliens", and the earth's creatures basically belong to the "two" reproduction, and it is speculated that the aliens whose intelligence is higher than the earth may be "three", or even more, But more is never better, and this is also a hypothetical science based on computer principles. If biological nature and computer chips have completely different properties, then the two are basically incomparable and irreplaceable. For example, theology and physics, idealism and materialism, etc., how can they understand each other and act on each other, but the two are not the same thing at all.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It's that we haven't developed 95% of the functions of our own brains.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It's not who limits us, it's ourselves, and our energy can't support 100% of our brains.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    We limit ourselves, and there is no such thing as others limiting ourselves.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    We didn't develop our own brains, we didn't develop 95% of the functions of our brains.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Generally speaking, the limit of one's own brain is very large, it just depends on whether it can be used or not.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    In fact, we don't develop our own brains, and it's not other people who limit our brains.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    I limit myself, I can't have a rich imagination, I don't dare to think.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    It's still us, and the human brain needs to work hard to keep developing.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    It is the transformation of the controller that limits our spirituality, Hawking is just a popular science writer, he is just a show, behind it is a really powerful consortium AI, the real genius is Tesla and many unknown scientists and others, genius is just a development opportunity plus a dense and powerful technology behind it.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    With the increasing maturity of virtual reality technology, a question that was raised when the computer was first invented has once again been put in front of people, that is: can our world, or the universe we live in, be the product of computer simulation?

    There are many scientists who believe that the world we live in is likely to be a virtual world simulated by a computer. What's more, for example, the philosopher Nick Bostrom at Harvard University, who and his team have calculated that we live 100% in a virtual world. So why do some scientists think we live in a virtual world simulated by a supercomputer?

    Scientists have given five examples to illustrate, so let's take a look at which five they are.

    1. Time slows down: According to Einstein's theory of relativity, we know that the faster an object moves, the slower its time will be, and this phenomenon is also known as the phenomenon of "time dilation". That's why astronauts who have been on the space station for a long time tend to be a little younger.

    2. Quantum properties: According to inertial thinking, we will think that everything in the material world is continuous and inseparable, just like there are countless numbers between the two numbers 0 and 1, but in fact, the transfer of energy is not inseparable and not continuous, but intermittent transmission, that is to say, there is the smallest unit of energy for energy transfer: quantum.

    3. Observer effect: From the famous "double-slit interference experiment", we can know that in the case of two different situations, with and without observers, the form of matter is different.

    4. What is quantum entanglement? Suppose there are two particles, A and B, and these two particles are entangled, then no matter where these two particles are in the universe, even if they are 100 million light-years apart, as long as Particle A has any action, then Particle B will reflect the action of Particle A in real time.

    Fifth, the speed of light cannot break through the upper limit We all know that the speed of light in a vacuum is about 300000000m s, scientists have tried to make the speed of light break through this limit through various experiments and control various variables but have failed, so the speed of light is the fastest speed in the universe.

    So why can't it break through this speed? Scientists can't find the cause in the real world, but they have found a possible cause in the virtual world, as we all know, there is a limit to the rate of computer CPU refreshes, in the case of a 4GHz CPU, 4GHz means 4 billion calculations or refreshes per second. Perhaps our world may be virtual to outsiders, but it is real to us in this world, so living happily every day is the most important thing at the moment.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    I think the reason why scientists say this may just be an assumption on their part.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Because they feel that there is something false about our world, and it is not very real.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    I really can't bear to tell you that human beings live in the virtual world, in fact, it is a century**! This is a fact, and no one can change it.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    The biggest reason is that a lot of things here don't feel real to us.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Maybe the whole world is a virtual state, and maybe someone else is controlling us remotely.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Because some people may have been dreaming of life and death in a muddy way, and they may really be living in a world that is defined.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    This is because these scientific possibilities have found something that is unbelievable.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    It's just a scientist's guess, and I think it's quite real that human beings live.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    I don't think it's possible, he probably just wants to scare us.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    1. All of them, I finally saw such a statement

    Related questions
    12 answers2024-05-08

    All this is arranged, I don't know if you have heard such a sentence, although today's science has been very developed, but today's human beings still have not discovered the existence of extraterrestrial life, this vast universe is like a pool of stagnant water, people can not feel any vitality, human beings are a kind of thinking task, we are constantly thinking, why we still can't find external life? Why is it that we have never been able to determine whether human beings originated from **? Some people even suspect that the world in which humans live is a virtual world, in fact, scientists also have different views on this point, he believes that if humans are really in the virtual world, then it may be divided into three modes. >>>More

    2 answers2024-05-08

    Albert Einstein (March 14, 1879 – April 18, 1955), a world-famous American scientist, was a Jew, the founder and founder of modern physics, the proposer of the theory of relativity - the "mass-energy relation", the defender of the "deterministic quantum mechanical interpretation" (vibrating particles) - God who does not roll dice. On December 26, 1999, Albert Einstein was selected as a "Great Man of the Century" by Time magazine in the United States. Newton, (25 December 1642 – 20 March 1727 in the Julian calendar, 4 January 1643 – 31 March 1727) was a great English mathematician, physicist, astronomer, and natural philosopher. >>>More

    3 answers2024-05-08

    The microscope, a scientific instrument that everyone knows, is also available in many people's homes, do you know how it came about? It is also "played". It was invented in 1632 by Levin Tiger Sakura Bend. >>>More

    4 answers2024-05-08

    Translation: scientist

    English sa nt st >>>More

    11 answers2024-05-08

    Sophia, the robot, once had a wish, it wanted to have a mind, it could have emotions, and even wanted to destroy humans. The idea of it, to this day, has caused many people to panic. The existence of artificial intelligence has long been controversial. >>>More