If you want to travel, is it better to take DC or DV?

Method 1Personally, I think it's okay to travel with DC, after all, it's more shooting, and DC generally has a camera, but the video is generally very large, you bring a digital companion, save the video in, you can shoot as much as you want!

Method 2Bring both DC and DV, and then bring someone to go, so won't you be busy? Hehe, just kidding

Hope it helps!

Personally, I think it's better to DC, because what is intercepted by DV can't be used as **, and the effect is much worse.

And DC can be filmed.

A digital companion is a must, otherwise the more beautiful the scenery, the more regretful you will be - not enough to shoot.

It depends on what environment you go to, if it's a humanities, bring a camera, if it's a natural scenery, bring a camera, the camera can be connected to the picture as a **, you come back and find a computer to deal with it yourself.

We can only go to many places of natural scenery once, and every moment it has rich and infinite changes, no good camera and technology can not be a real memory, or the camera is good, as for the humanities, 3000 unchanged, the main thing is a group photo of two people, commemorating, so the camera is enough.

If you're traveling light, just take DC

If that bit of DV weight doesn't matter to you, just bring both, or you'll regret it once.

I've had you like this occasion. In the past, when I went out with my puppet girlfriend, I brought it all with me, but later I found out that it was better to only bring DC. After all, two people don't have much energy to travel, so they can do everything.

It depends on the pixels of your DV, if it is high, it will be DV, and if it is low, it will be DC

Considering that the premise is travel.

Of course, DC is better.

with modern technology.

There is not much difference between DC and DV anymore.

But as far as travel is concerned.

Obviously, DC has a greater advantage in the replenishment of power supply.

Photography and videography look similar, in fact, it is not a concept at all, if you don't have a little video foundation, it's better to travel with a digital camera, if you don't master DV well, then you will have nothing to remember when you go home. If you like to shoot DV, you can practice at home first, and you can't just watch the small screen to see the effect, but you can only see the effect when you put it on the TV.

I recommend that you bring a digital camera because you can take more photos and it also has a camera function, which is also lighter in comparison.

Digital camera, lightweight, easy to use, travel mainly or to take pictures, people, can also be short-term photography, in general digital cameras are more applicable.

The camera can't explain anything because of some things.

And if there is an emergency, you can shoot it just in time and sell it to the TV station.

My experience is that with a camera, you can also shoot, you can also shoot, and it is dynamic, if you want to do **, you can also take static. Very useful! I don't know what you think?

I like photography, or digital cameras.

Camera, I have both, but I found that only the camera is the most practical, the camera can only shoot others, and I rarely see it when I shoot it back, ** is different.

Digital camera bar, convenient in every way.

The digital camera is good, it's small and convenient.

Unless you can make sure you have enough digital, I still like to use travel, because I can shoot as many as I want.

Digital cameras are good Small and convenient.

AIPTEK AHD H23 Series Digital Camera.

The camera is good, the owner of the building to buy a card machine or a SLR, the card machine recommends Canon IXUS230 and Sony WX9, and the SLR recommends Canon 600D with 18-135 lens.

To be honest, your question is really bad, one is quiet, which can give you infinite reverie and aftertaste, and the other is that the choice between recorded movements and stillness is up to you