I would like to know about historical examples of failures due to reckless militarism

The last monarch of the Hittite Empire, during his foreign expeditions, rebelled internally, causing foreign enemies to be destroyed. The Hittite continued to expand from day one.

Takeda Katsuyori violated Shingen's posthumous instruction that troops should not be sent within three years, and sent troops everywhere. In the end, he was defeated by the Weaving De coalition army in the Battle of Changxiao.

Business. Yang Guang.

Aisin Jueluo - Hongli.

Jiang Zhongzheng.

Before and after World War II, Japan invaded and expanded, and finally failed.

<> "How tragic the end of the reckless military force in history is."

There have been fourteen emperors in history who have been reckless, so there have been thirteen relapses who have fallen to the country. The most typical are Qin Shi Huang and Emperor Yang of Sui.

Emperor Xianyang of the Sui Dynasty attacked Goguryeo three times, but failed all three times, exhausted his financial resources, provoked a mutiny, and finally lost his country.

In 612 AD, Emperor Yang of Sui mobilized more than 1.13 million soldiers from all over the world to gather in Zhuo County, with a number of 2 million; The number of people transporting grain and straw doubled, and the number of farmers and conscripts in the whole country was more than 3 million, and the world was in turmoil.

Xin Shixiong, the general of the right guard, led 305,000 men to attack Pyongyang, and the Sui army was defeated and Xin Shixiong was killed.

Of the more than 300,000 Sui troops, only 2,700 survived Liaodong City. Emperor Yang of Sui's first expedition to Goryeo failed.

Later, in April 613, Emperor Yang of Sui personally commanded 600,000 right route troops to attack Liaodong City, and in February 614, Emperor Yang of Sui launched the third war to conquer Liao, all of which failed.

Soldiers rebelled within the army, and peasant uprisings swept across the country.

無兵黩武 (qióngbīng dú wǔ), also known as "soldier famine", is listed as one of the "three mountains" along with "political corruption and social unrest". The meaning of the term refers to the use of war and force to solve problems in times of poverty, which often only lead to more chaos, suffering, and disaster. It reflects the interaction of a social system, political beliefs, economic conditions, and other factors, and shows the fact that war and violence cannot solve the real problems of the population.

Historically, the typical manifestation of reckless militarism has been the frequent occurrence of wars and the continuous expansion of their scale. From ancient times to the present, various countries and regions have been affected by wars. Especially in agrarian societies, the devastation caused by war is often more serious, and it is difficult to protect people's lives and property, which increases the burden on the people.

In addition to war, political corruption, social unrest, and other factors are also important reasons for the recklessness of military force. Political corruption can lead to the destruction of justice and the collapse of mechanisms for maintaining social stability, while social unrest may lead to vicious incidents such as ethnic conflicts, religious contradictions, and class antagonism, which will make reckless militarism more serious.

Reckless militarism has not only brought great disasters to history, but has also taught people to realize that peace, cooperation and development are the basic values of humanity, and that working together towards a brighter and better future is the fundamental way to solve problems. In the course of history, all countries should constantly reform their own systems and gradually move towards a prosperous, stable and harmonious society.

Wanton militarism refers to the military means adopted by a country or region in order to safeguard its own interests under the circumstances of economic difficulties. In such cases, wars often become extremely brutal and ruthless, resulting in a large number of human and property losses.

In modern society, the phenomenon of reckless militarism still exists. For example, in order to gain access to more energy and markets, some countries have adopted expansionist policies similar to those of Germany and Japan in the past, leading to conflicts and wars in some regions. In addition, some countries may also adopt nationalist policies similar to those of Germany and Japan due to internal economic crises and political turmoil, which can lead to the outbreak of war.

Wanton militarism refers to the military means adopted by a country or region in order to safeguard its own interests under the circumstances of economic difficulties. In such cases, wars often become extremely brutal and ruthless, resulting in a large number of human and property losses.

In short, the reckless use of military force is an extremely dangerous phenomenon that should arouse the vigilance and attention of all countries in the world. Only through international cooperation and economic development can we avoid the recurrence of similar wars.

Historically, the phenomenon of reckless use of military force has occurred from time to time. For example, before World War II, due to the crushing defeat and economic crisis of World War I, Germany adopted an extreme nationalist and expansionist policy, constantly invading its neighbors, which eventually led to the outbreak of World War II. Similarly, in the first half of the 20th century, Japan experienced a similar economic crisis and political turmoil, and adopted an extremely aggressive policy in order to obtain resources and markets, which eventually led to the outbreak of the Pacific War.

In short, the reckless use of military force is an extremely dangerous phenomenon that should arouse the vigilance and attention of all countries in the world. Only through international cooperation and economic development can we avoid the recurrence of similar wars.

Militarism is a state of war that indicates that a country or organization is in a state of readiness for all-out war. In this state, the military can take precedence over other issues, and the state can devote almost all its resources to the military in order to increase its strategic advantage and ensure victory.

The concept of reckless military force first appeared in the Art of War, "If you are poor, you will change, and if you change, you will be successful, or if you are fast, you will be able to do it for a long time." This means that if a country is in a losing situation, it can only win by changing the tactics and tactics of war, strengthening the "change" of equipment, soldier training, etc.

However, the smug of the military can pose a series of problems. First of all, this state of war requires a large amount of money, war materials, personnel, technology and other resources, which may endanger the economic development of the country or organization. Second, this state of affairs may cause the people and some conscious people to feel tired and dissatisfied, and then there may be unrest or social instability.

Finally, the use and use of the army may increase in a state of recklessness, which can lead to a significant loss of life and property.

Still, in some cases, recklessness is inevitable. For example, when a country or organization is faced with serious security challenges, it may have to resort to some radical measures to protect its interests and dignity. At this point, reckless militarism can be seen as a warning and a means of deterrence.

In short, international criticism of militarism without understanding the context and destination of lifestyle and decision-making is foolish and irresponsible. The meaning and purpose of the use of military force in different countries or organizations are different. <>