Why didn t Sun Yat sen kill Pu Yi and those Qing Dynasty royals? Did he do it right? Why

First of all, who told you that Lenin gave such an order? There is no historical evidence of this folklore. And then back to your question:

Why didn't Sun Yat-sen want to destroy the feudal remnants, the question was whether he could destroy them? He did not have a single soldier in his hands, and relied entirely on his prestige to incite the ...... of the uprisingThe revolutionary army was almost pacified by Yuan Shikai before it hit the Yangtze River, and it was already a miracle that Yuan Shikai could force Qing to abdicate.

The abdication of the Qing Dynasty only meant that it had failed, and the Qing royal family surrendered when the Nationalist army entered Beijing, and the prisoners were treated preferentially.

Sun Yat-sen failed to occupy Beijing, it was Yuan Shikai who forced the Qing Emperor to abdicate, and it was Feng Yuxiang who drove Pu Yi and his family out of the Forbidden City.

No. Cao Cao did not kill the last emperor of the Han Dynasty.

The later Sima Yi family also did not kill Cao Cao's descendant emperor.

Pu Yi is actually a puppet and has no real power, so there is no need to kill him. Besides, the political situation was not very stable at that time, so killing Pu Yi was likely to cause trouble.

Because he was still too young when the Qing Dynasty fell, he abdicated peacefully, and there was no dispute, so he still survived safely.

Pu Yi is no threat to any force, so there is no need to kill him, and the ** requirements at that time are preferential treatment for the royal family and cannot be disposed of excessively.

Because Pu Yi abdicated at that time, after all, he was a symbol of imperial power and was still very prestigious in all walks of life, so he was the object of wooing from all parties.

Pu Yi can be said to be a special person in a special period, and the old-fashioned people still respect Pu Yi, but the new society wants everyone to know that everyone is equal, so Pu Yi was not killed.

At that time, Pu Yi was still a child, and there was no need to abdicate and kill him, and then Pu Yi grew up and knew how to be a man and knew how to advance and retreat, so he could live to the end.

First, because of his status as the last emperor, it is valuable for many people. On the other hand, he himself has good qualities, which is also the reason why he was able to get a good death.

The fall of Manchukuo did not kill Emperor Puyi, not to mention that when the Qing Dynasty fell, people were still children, and there were many people to kill after the fall of the Qing Dynasty, fighting for power and profit, and there was no time and energy to kill Puyi.

This move by Sun Yat-sen is the progress of history and the inevitability of history. There are a number of reasons for this:

Sun Yat-sen represented the bourgeoisie, and the overthrow of the Qing Dynasty was an inevitable product of the development of Chinese capitalism. You must know that capitalism existed in China long before the invasion of capitalist countries, and the invasion of foreign powers further disintegrated the feudal economy and promoted the development of national capitalism, which led to the social system at that time not being suitable for the development of capitalism (remember to measure whether a system is progressive, it depends on whether its system is adapted to the production relations at that time, which will be learned in junior high school political books), that is, the Qing Dynasty could not adapt to the development of capitalism at that time, which also led to the collapse of the old system (the fall of the Qing Dynasty) and the emergence of a new system (Sun Yat-sen established the Nanjing Provisional **), as Sun Yat-sen said:"Temporary**, the first of the revolutionary era. ”

Pu Yi was not killed in the Qing Dynasty because Pu Yi had no real power at that time, and the people of Suizi Mu disdained to kill him, and he had no benefit or disadvantage.

Because Pu Yi is still very meaningful as the last emperor and can be used.

Clause. 1. At that time, the people still had a sense of belonging to the imperial power, and killing the Manchu royal family was afraid that it would cause a riot among the people.

Clause. Second, Yuan Shikai knew that once the royal family was cleared, it would not be possible to cut the grass and eradicate the roots, and someone would inevitably fight to the death, threatening his status and life.

Yuan Shikai did not kill Pu Yi and the Manchu royal family out of concern for his own future, and if he killed Pu Yi at that time, he would not be able to escape the blame.

Although Yuan Shikai had his own army in the late Qing Dynasty, he still had feudal ideas in his bones. Although Pu Yi is a very cowardly emperor, he still wants to enjoy the honor of the emperor, and does not kill Pu Yi in order to get a throne that abdicates, not to rob it, so as to satisfy his vanity.