Is Argentina s play against Germany a match fixing, and is Argentina s loss to Germany a match fixin

Yes, match-fixing caught them all with a lie detector and it was obvious that their eyes were without the slightest sense of guilt and urgency.

A bit of a fake, Argentina's strength should not be bad.

That is, in a game, don't win and win, and if you lose, you will spray a thousand reasons.

The strength of the two teams is inseparable, lz please don't be confused by the score of 4:0, but it is said that Argentina is a little undermatched, but unfortunately in the opening three points, it was scored by Muller, which disrupted the overall plan, resulting in tactical passivity, and was easily counterattacked by Germany.

Although I am a die-hard German fan, in other words, if Argentina had scored the first goal in the opening game, the score might have been reversed, and it can only be said that the on-the-spot play and Argentina's fragile nerves, and the Argentine team has a little less luck, don't complain, don't be.

Brazil vs. Netherlands was more like. (Compared with the two halves, the personnel are exactly the same, and the difference between the scenes is too big).

In this game, Argentina's defense against Germany's defense completely failed, having said that, Argentina has such a strong offensive line, but there is a world's third-rate defensive line, long and short feet are powerful. Losing 4 is not a proof of Germany's strength, but a proof of Argentina's weakness.

Everyone was deceived by Argentina's strong forward when he played a weak team, and the referee's misjudgment gave Argentina a lot of benefits, so there would be the illusion that Argentina was strong in front of him, in fact, Argentina's fifth World Cup in South America proved that there is a big gap between its strength and Brazil.

Definitely not.

Germany's iron bucket defense is bullish.

Plus the K-God.

How could it be match-fixing...

It is unlikely that Argentine football should reflect on itself and learn from the experience of European tactics as a whole.

Probably not. Messi can't possibly joke about the Hercules Cup.

He hasn't taken it yet.

In fact, you can see the strength of the German team from the group stage, right? Does Argentina's backline still use match-fixing?

You're all in China.

Are you talking about 2010 or 2006

It shouldn't be that Germany won the 2006 penalty shoot-out at home.

In 2010, there were obvious problems in the Argentine backline, too much emphasis on attacking the backline, and due to the excellent play of the German midfield, the German team beat Argentina by a large margin.

Are you talking about that World Cup? The last two games I think are suspicious of favoritism, and I can't say that they are completely match-fixing. In the 06 World Cup, Germany is the host, there is no reason not to favor him, and Riquelme's ability is limited, his spirit has been crushed by the weight of Germany's home stadium, and the central defender of the back line is not good, Heinze is more than brave but the air defense is not enough, Ayala scored the most but lost the second goal is his position problem, which is considered a merit and demerit, and the Germans' pre-game preparation is very good, the small note is indeed discussed, but there is no rule that cannot be used.

In the 10 World Cup, I think it is completely the strength of the German team, the reason why FIFA did not praise Germany, the players are not big names, and they are in a transition period, and they lost to Argentina in the warm-up game before the World Cup, which is very unstable. Argentina seems to be strong, but in fact, it was completely defeated by Messi, Messi has no organizational ability, only knows blind dribbling, the success rate of dribbling is still very low, the pressure on defensive players after losing the ball is very high, Messi is like a fish in water in La Liga and Barcelona, but after all, it is a football association that can manipulate, in the South American World Preliminary Tournament and the World Cup in real games like Messi can't pass people at all, and the third-rate players of Greece by a third-rate team like Papastathopoulos explain everything. Although Germany is in a transition period, it still inherits the previous pragmatism of the German team, insists on anti-counterattack, and the routines and playing styles are very mature, the transmission is simple, and the header kung fu, and the best Veron of the game before the World Cup did not play, and the backbone of the defense Samuel did not play and also reduced Argentina's strength, but Argentina lost not so much to Germany, but to lose to itself.

There is offense but no defense. It's normal to concede a set-piece and then attack aggressively and get counter-attacked, and the main theme of the 2010 World Cup is to control the ball and stand on defense. Just look at Spain and the Netherlands, who reached the final.

Are you referring to the 2006 World Cup in Germany? Answer: No. Germany relied on home advantage to eliminate Argentina on penalties, which was a matter of luck.

Argentina's loss to Germany in the 2010 World Cup in South Africa should not be match-fixing, the World Cup is a heavyweight game for the country to win the game, besides, many players cried on the spot, I think Argentina did not play well.

The 10-year World Cup is actually a top-heavy World Cup for Argentina. The strikers are strong, the defenders are rotten. Germany went crazy in that game, so that's the result.

Messi is in a transition period, starting to have a No. 9 and a half transformations, and he is too far from the goal. Messi's position at Barcelona is ideal now. I think the biggest failure of that World Cup was Maradona. Although he himself is a god on the field.

It's match-fixing, and there is an underground agency in Europe that operates it, the details are private.

Match-fixing is huge, and the Argentine defense is like a stupid pen, but Maradona is very kind, but it's hard to say.

No, Maradona's coaching skills were too poor.

The World Cup in South Africa should not be.

Argentina's overall strength is now far inferior to Germany's.

Even if Argentina had the best strikers in the world, it wouldn't help.

It's not match-fixing, it's all obvious in terms of height, speed, ability. Argentina is passive

No, because it's simply impossible.

No! The result on the football field is possible in any way!

Look at the line-up of Argentina and Germany, what are you kidding.