Why don t you like Frank Lampard Tell us why you like Frank Lampard?

He hated Frank Lampard because of his background. Frank Lampard comes from a football family, with Redknapp and his father and son both his relatives, and his father, Frank Lampard Sr., also a key figure in the Hammers' Academy. The family's success in football has created excellent conditions for him from an early age.

I like a person because he has a good character, but Frank Lampard is a man who violates moral theory, deliberately fouls and deliberately makes things bad.

This person is very bad, doesn't think about his teammates, is a selfish person, and has a feeling of deliberately stirring up the situation.

I don't like your perseverance, the canopy falls, it opens again, the game loses, and then come, the advertisement is not well shot, and I shoot again, so that I even play video games with your spirit, and it almost didn't make people flattened.

Do you need a reason to dislike him, it's just that it's not nice to see him, it's not the type I like in my eyes.

Because, because, well, probably, because, I don't know him.

It's right to be handsome, but relying on appearance to tease girls, this makes me very disgusted and feels particularly indecent.

Because it's very unreliable, playing a ball makes me feel very unreal, and I feel that this world is very unfair, and I can release water like this.

Because he is not handsome enough and is a little hunchbacked? Adversity. Let's take Lescott, or our Saha.

I don't deny everything he's done to Chelsea, but you've already gone to the United States, so why are you coming back??? I really want to think about the Blue Devils, what do you mean when you play, and you really want to kick?? Chelsea didn't defend you very hard?

Take you as a friend, but you bite back, I'll hehe, no wonder Hazard hugged you, and after hugging, he threw you a white eye.

After scoring the penalty in the shoot-out, he made a very unreasonable move to the United fans.

Frank Lampard's temperament is very unique, melancholy but full of the image of an iron-blooded man. The rational but memorable lens is indeed his emotional side...08 Defeat of Liverpool with both fingers, 10 World Cup strange heads and turns, and bowed his head and was silent when he broke through the Chelsea door and refused to celebrate....Every moment feels like it's too extreme. Tung orange withered back.

I like Frank Lampard a lot and I think it comes down to my sense of broadness because of the few players in England who are so talented. It is one of the few talents who can be close to Scholes, Beckham, Rooney and other talents in terms of talent (combination of technique, physical coordination, ball sense, rhythm, ball quotient, etc.), and his physical condition is really outstanding.

Frank Lampard is a smart player who knows how to run and how to pass. As a midfielder, being able to chase Heping Henry's record in the Premier League is inseparable from his own ability, although he has the credit of the system. His dribbling isn't auspicious, but his sense of position and big-picture vision is amazing.

I like his ball quotient, it seems to be bland, but it's simple and practical, there are no fancy moves, there is no mud and water in the stove, and there will be no return passes....Quechai is dressed on the field, and it is always reassuring. I think Frank Lampard has done it. So I never doubted his IQ index.

Resilience, hard work, seriousness, kindness, strength, insertion, long passing, bursting, head cone, defence, leadership, giving teammates a sense of security, allowing teammates to play with peace of mind, tactical adaptability, Blues. There's nothing else to fight in the hunger mill, not much. Lan 8, Nesta, will love all his life.

His first fondness for Lampaz was in his sophomore year at Camp Nou, when he set up Ramirez at Camp Nou, giving Chelsea hope and finally coming together to defeat the then unbeatable Barcelona. From that moment on, I couldn't help myself with admiration. Liking a person is not based on his success or failure, but because of his temperament.

There is a player whose fate was once the same as that of the Blue Lions before his rise, at best a second-rate midfielder in the Premier League, a fringe figure in the national team. And after the blue lion suddenly woke up with a shudder, many people thought that he would be like some of the previous members of the blue lion, because he couldn't adapt to the mutated environment and had to leave. But he didn't.

He persevered.

It's really effective to be a super sub at Manchester City! I like to laugh and slip is this point, and it is true that he is smart enough to be poor, and he is probably smarter than the magic bird, and Black Gerald is not leaking at all. I don't like it overall, and I'm not a midfield master.

Normal operation, did not do their job well during their tenure, and their ability to lead the team was questioned, and the results were predictable.

I feel that his dismissal is just a victim of the internal struggle within Chelsea's management. He became the one who took the blame, and being fired from class does not mean that the responsibility is all his own.

Frank Lampard's dismissal seems normal to me. Frank Lampard's lack of managerial experience has led him back to the club as a team celebrity. Perhaps the team's management thinks that the team's current squad is enough to win a couple of titles.

And with Frank Lampard's management, it is unlikely, so the management moved the idea of changing the manager. It could also be that the team's results are too poor this season. So he had to get out of class.

Frank Lampard's dismissal, this speed is unexpected, but it is also expected, compared to the previous coaches who got out of class, we will see how much it is not surprising, every time Abou changes coaches, many British ** and well-known people in the circle find it very ridiculous, but he changed coaches 11 times, thus getting 16 titles, people who are unfair to the manager after the class rarely admit publicly that Abu acted correctly and wisely, and the Chelsea coach was sacked due to poor results compared to, Abu's coach change is a typical patriarchal idea, if you succeed, you are God, there will be no shortage of flowers and honors, and there is only one way to achieve you if you don't succeed.

Was Frank Lampard wronged?

If he was wronged, he would find a reason from the point of view of a long-term plan, and if he had not been wronged, the evidence was reliable。The data is in front of us, of all Abou's official managers, Frank Lampard has the lowest average points per game, the lowest score in strong conversations, and the most goals, in the middle of the season, Chelsea are not only eager to win the title, even fourth place is in danger, I don't know if the magic lantern for the new year is kept, Lampard's contract is 2 years official and 1 year renewal, not the legendary 3-year contract, with an annual salary of 4 million pounds, the second year, Abou only needs to pay half of his salary, when will Lampard's contract take effect in the third year, After the first season, the decision was based on performance and Frank Lampard was not activated.

It was already a shrewd but stark warning to Lampard

The top four are just passing grades, which is by no means an outcome that Chelsea can afford to be satisfied with. Many people will point out that Lampard didn't spend a penny in his fourth year, at first glance, this statement makes sense, but Chelsea has never been a frugal club, and finishing fourth without spending money can only show that Lampard's lower limit is high, but his upper limit cannot be explained, he invested more than 200 million yuan, and the test is his upper limit, it is a pity that Abu is so cruel to him, which indirectly shows that Chelsea is a standard giant, and the strong can survive, Frank Lampard can't fully understand the meaning of the sacred at this point, instead insisting that he wants to establish a new culture and style for Chelsea.

He hopes that the flowers of youth training will bloom on the blue bridge, and the ideal is very lofty and admirable. Provided you understand the Chelsea club culture and the level of a young apprentice is enough to help you through, Lampard will not only know why Chelsea are in this arenaThose 16 big and small champions told him that winning is everything, and the more you can play again, the better.

Anyway, great players don't necessarily make great coaches, and Frank Lampard's departure can only be said to be another beginning in his life, and his departure has left many people sad, and hopefully he can pick himself up and return to the top of his playing days as a coach.

It is likely that Chelsea will be disqualified from next season's Champions League, which Chelsea need to qualify for next season's Champions League so that they can continue on the rebuilding path, but Frank Lampard's departure could make the team's record worse.

I don't think there's anything to lose because for a club like Chelsea it needs results and it's very common for a manager to get sacked if he doesn't get good results.

I think it's a big loss because he's still very good at coaching, and it's a shame that we've broken up.