Canon 600D vs Nikon D90 which is better to shoot scenery or other models around 6000

Hello! Among DSLRs, the Nikon model has sharper images and is suitable for shooting landscapes; Canon models have more realistic color reproduction and softer images, making them ideal for portrait shooting.

But it won't be "much worse", it's just that the style is different, the Nikon model shoots the landscape image more sharply (the contrast of the scene is larger, and it looks more vivid), and the Canon model shoots the landscape image color closer to the primary color of the scene, which is more realistic and soft.

It is recommended to choose the Canon 600D.

5580 yuan (with 18-135is lens set).

Consider its predecessor, the Canon EOS 550D, which was once touted as the "most powerful entry-level SLR".

The Canon 550D has reached the peak of the entry-level SLR level in terms of performance, and for the time being, no entry-level rival model can surpass the 550D in terms of comprehensive performance, and even some mid-range models cannot compare with it in one or two items.

Whereas, the Canon 600D is an upgraded version of the Canon 550D.

Pros: Flip screen, wireless flash and art filters on the 550D: a solid facelift.

Cons: Compared to the 550D, there are almost no performance upgrades.

It should be d90 a little better.

The D7000 is good, that's what I'm using now.

These two ** are about the same, you can choose which one, depending on your needs and preferences.

D90 was listed relatively early, purely from the performance data, there are many that have been surpassed by 550D, such as camera function, number of pixels, display screen, in addition550D improved metering system, high noise control is also much better than 500D, and the difference with D90 is not so obvious. However, in terms of focusing system, battery life, and continuous shooting speed, the D90 has an advantage, and most importantly, the appearance and feel of the D90 is definitely a notch higher than that of the 550D.

So to put it simply, the performance of the two is about the same, D90 wins in the feel, and 550D wins in a "new" word.

For advertising photography, a larger pixel count can result in a larger image size, so the 550d is still very advantageous. In contrast, the D90's advantages in battery life and focusing speed are less significant, and while I highly recommend the D90 myself, the 550D may be a better fit for you. In addition, if you have abundant funds, you may wish to increase some investment to buy 50D, out of the camera function, the performance of 50D must be the best within 10,000 yuan, and 50D is a real mid-range APS SLR, more suitable for professional users.

6500 buy d90 is not enough, 600d+18-135 is more expensive than d90 set of machines, and to tell the truth, it is useless to look at the parameter configuration, 600d is more like a plastic toy in front of d90 (although d90 is also a plastic body material), the performance is not much stronger than the classic model 3 years ago, especially the high sensitivity quality, focusing system and continuous shooting speed, it's just that the pixels are inflated, it's really not worth choosing. 6500 budget D5100 + 18-105VR is just enough, it is recommended to increase the budget a little, 7000 or so to buy D90 sets of machines is more appropriate.

Personally, I like the 600d, after all, it just came out. Now** is also suitable, at the beginning of 600d or d5100, don't think about it, in fact, it's almost the same.

If you usually play it, 600d with many functions is good. Take a slightly more professional picture on the D90