There is a poem about Descartes, I think, therefore I am, I don t know who wrote it.40

This is certainly not written by Descartes, but by someone who does not really understand "I think therefore i am".

(I don't know who) wrote it for Descartes, and it's obviously not very clever.

According to Descartes' based on "I think therefore i am".

In the philosophical spirit, writing poetry—especially this hazy poetry—is a degeneration; The most important thing is to be clear!

Descartes's.

The reeds in the wind are thinking, I think, therefore I am.

Give a reason ... Why didn't he write it.

You in the poem are not referring to Descartes.

It's metaphysical. Metaphysics is transcendental, so there's your shadow everywhere, and your light and so on.

This statement. The First Philosophy or Aristotle's statement is the first impulse of the universe.

is worthy of such praise.

Descartes was great, but not God.

Descartes's.

The reeds in the wind are thinking, I think, therefore I am.

Russell? Guess.

He loves to write limerick poems.

To understand this sentence, we must start with a question. One day, Descartes sat by the fire and nodded, absent-minded. Suddenly, he thought of a question similar to Zhuangzi's exchange for a butterfly – "How do I know if I'm awake or dreaming, or how can I be sure that everything around me is real?"

He thought about it for a long time, but he couldn't come up with strong evidence to prove it. Therefore, the authenticity of these things is simply "pending", that is, they do not exist until they are proven to exist.

What doesn't exist? The stove next to him, the blanket over his body, even his own body - because these can be seen in dreams. So almost everything is gone, right?

Is there one thing we can be sure of is true? And then Descartes thought, there is one. Am I not doubting the existence of everything?

Is it at least certain that I doubt the existence of everything? The more you doubt the reality of the world, the less you can deny that you are doubting!

Since this activity of doubt as an activity of thought is indisputable, does not it have some kind of origin? This so-called progenitor of thought, in philosophy is called the subject of epistemology. I am the creator of knowledge or the subject of knowledge, so no matter how much I doubt the world, I cannot doubt my own existence.

On the contrary, the more I doubt the world, the more convinced I have to be of my own existence.

It's called "I think, therefore I am". Descartes had a great idea, and it's a very important part of the history of philosophy, which we call the epistemological turn. What does this mean?

Once upon a time, we always thought that the world was like this, and never doubted that the world was like this in our eyes. Now Descartes opened up a new way of thinking: before we can study the world, we have to figure out whether the world we see, the world we feel, is really the world.

The technical bullet point is "How does human cognition happen?" And "How is our knowledge possible?" To solve this problem, Western philosophy has been immersed in idealistic philosophy for nearly 300 years.

Eventually, this was replaced by neuroscience and psychology, and philosophers turned to other questions. But Descartes did open the door to a new world.

Descartes is a famous French philosopher, and the idea put forward by Dicard means that we have the value of existence only when people think, and people will keep thinking as long as they exist.

The phrase "I think, therefore I am" shows that Descartes was an idealist, and I do not agree with him. Because our world is materialistic.

This is a typical idealist thought, and we should look at this idea of Descartes dialectically.

The ostensible meaning is "I think, so I exist." ”

The deep meaning is: "The only thing I can be sure of is the existence of my own mind, because when I doubt the other, I cannot doubt my own mind at the same time", or "I cannot deny my own existence, because when I deny, doubt, I already exist!" ”

Descartes' "I think, therefore I am" is the starting point of Descartes' entire epistemological philosophy, and the end point of his "general skepticism". From this point of view, he confirms the legitimacy of human knowledge.

That is to say: Descartes was an idealist, but it is not seen from this proposition, "I think, therefore I am" is not an idealistic proposition, but a purely epistemological content.

To say that Descartes was an idealist is to conclude from a general examination of his philosophical system, not from this proposition, that it is neither materialistic nor idealistic.

In contrast to materialism, Qiaoqiao asserts that consciousness is the root and foundation of the existence of all filial piety bonds in the world, and that everything in the external world is produced by subjective consciousness.

Categories: Teaching and Education Academic Exam >>**Report Problem Description:

Isn't this it:?? The supreme metaphysical, at the bend of time, your shadow is everywhere, through the dust of the centuries, because of a thought, your light shines all the way in the garden of the human spirit, and you are an evergreen leaf, "I think therefore I am", a whisper from philosophy, whose voice is like a shuttle, at every intersection so says the wise man.

Analysis: Descartes: I think, therefore I am.

The supreme metaphysical.

At the turning point of time.

Your shadow is everywhere.

Through the dust of the centuries.

Because of a thought, your light shines all the way.

In the garden of the human spirit.

You are an evergreen leaf.

i think therefore i am”

Whispers from philosophy whose voice is like a shuttle.

At every intersection.

So says the wise man.

What does I mean, therefore I am"?

This is an important proposition of Descartes, and it seems to him to be a truth. Descartes first doubted the reality of the existence of everything, such as eating, dressing, and everything that seemed ordinary to ordinary people. For him, the expression of human activity in the mind can be divided into reality and dreams, but the reality of these two is different, the former is real, and the latter is unreal, but for a person, the mind can clearly know whether what he feels is in reality or in a dream is impossible, no one will think that what he does not perceive from Lu Feng is unreal when he is dreaming, he will not think that he is dreaming, only when he wakes up, Only then did I realize that what had just happened was something from a dream and was unreal.

So Descartes doubted the truth of everything, and this assumption was valid in Descartes' view. So there is no absolute meaning between real and unreal, because no one can say for sure that he is not dreaming. But there is a proposition that cannot be doubted, and that is the sentence I just said, that is, "I think, therefore I am", because a person, whether in reality or in a dream, cannot deny that he is perceiving and thinking, so as long as a person is perceiving and thinking, then he must be real, because only living people have this ability.