In order to complete the target of returning farmland to destroy 10,000 mu of ripe crops, what is th

Since July, the Chenbalhu Banner of Hulunbuir City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, has destroyed more than 20,000 mu of wheat and rape that are about to mature, and has suddenly completed the target of returning farmland to forest. It is estimated that millions of catties of wheat and rapeseed have been damaged. After this reporter interviewed the incident, the banner has suspended the eradication of the remaining 20,000 mu of crops, and will return farmland to forests after the autumn harvest.

From a farmer's point of view, there should also be a minimum of mercy for those innocent crops not to fall on the ground ten days before harvesting. As an administrative department, of course, it is not unclear that the value of goodwill in planting trees after harvesting the crops. A cadre of Chen Balhuqi said that the higher authorities urged them to complete the task of returning farmland to forests by 31 August, and that "unless the pilot work of returning farmland to forests is not done, there is no room for discussion."

There is a lot of helplessness in the words - there are three pilot areas in Inner Mongolia for returning farmland to forests. As of June, the other two places had completed the main tasks for the year, while Hulunbuir had only completed a small part, and was criticized in the inspection of the relevant departments in Inner Mongolia. Local pressures can be imagined.

In the opinion of the bureau, it is illegal for the growers to forcibly plant without signing a contract, and the forest farm staff to stop them on the spot, and the growers still sow seeds. According to reports, from March 25, before spring plowing this year, Qili has repeatedly issued notices to stop and prohibit planting. The problem is that growers who are seen as wayward lawbreakers do not see it that way, and in their words, there is compensation for returning farmland to forest, and there is no clear compensation plan in the flag for spring ploughing.

Although I received a ban, I didn't know how to compensate for it, so I planted it first so that the harvest would not be reduced this year.

This also shows that the communication mechanism between the two parties is not smooth, and the lack of management and coordination strategies of the administrative department is even more obvious.

It is the top priority to make the policy deeply rooted in the hearts of the people and make the communication smooth. Only by going into the earth and the hearts of the people can we understand what the earth is thinking and what the masses are thinking, and can we respect the will of the people, the land, and the law, and make the fairest and most appropriate arrangements.

The attitude of the peasants towards destroying 10,000 mu of ripe crops in order to complete the target of returning farmland is that half of the people oppose and half of the people support it, because it is a huge loss that so much grain is destroyed, and the support is to feel that it conforms to the national policy.

Opposing attitudes. Fortunately, the grain that has been planted for a year is about to ripen, but it is about to be destroyed.

The peasants are opposed, after all, they are the grain they have grown with their own hard work and sweat, and they do not want the fruits of their hard work to be destroyed.

The attitude of the peasants is very distressed, but in order to support national construction and promote economic and social development, they also support delay.

There is an attitude of opposition. After all, farmers live from their fields. The fields also served as food and clothing for the peasants. It was the dealer who gave the peasants food and clothing. So it will be very opposed.

I feel distressed and opposed, every mu of grain is obtained by the peasants themselves, and they have worked hard to exchange for every drop of sweat, so why can't we delay for a period of time and wait for the harvest before returning to farmland.

Summary. Hello, glad to answer for you! When high-standard farmland is implemented, the land is forcibly destroyed, and in this case, it is possible to demand compensation from the village.

When the county party committee implemented high-standard farmland, wheat was the growing period, and the field was forcibly destroyed, what should I do?

Hello, glad to answer for you! When high-standard farmland is implemented, the land is forcibly destroyed, and in this case, it is possible to demand compensation from the village.

According to Article 25 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Land Management Law, if you are not satisfied with the compensation for land acquisition, you can apply to the people who approved the land expropriation for a ruling. If you are not satisfied with the compensation standard stipulated in the resettlement compensation plan, the people of each provincial level have stipulated the compensation of the potato and the adjudication procedure. First of all, it is necessary to apply for coordination with the people who implement the expropriation of land, and if the coordination fails, the people at the next higher level can apply for a ruling if they repent.

This is largely due to the lack of nutrients in the land, which has led to a reduction in wheat yields, or possibly due to weather conditions.

There is not enough moisture in the soil, not enough light, not much sunlight, the quality of the seeds is not good, there is no timely watering, there is no timely fertilization.

The water storage capacity of the deep ploughed soil is very poor, the nutrients are very low, the soil structure is poor, and the microbial community in the soil is unbalanced, so the wheat yield is reduced.

Protecting the ecological environment is a long-term plan for China's development, and only the living environment of human beings and vigorously developing the economy can be meaningful. Returning farmland to forests is a major policy decision made by China to restore the ecological environment, and it is a major project for the benefit of the country and the people, which requires the vigorous support of all administrative departments and individuals. Recently, in order to complete the target of returning farmland to forest, Chen Balhu Banner in Hulunbuir City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, actually destroyed more than 20,000 mu of crops that were about to mature.

It is understood that as early as before the spring ploughing, the relevant departments had issued an order to prohibit sowing, but did not give the corresponding compensation for returning farmland, and the villagers forcibly sowed the seeds in order not to reduce the harvest. It is a certain mistake for the villagers to not comply with the relevant regulations and sow seeds without permission, but in my opinion, it is also a fault for the relevant departments to prevent the villagers from planting seeds in time and not to make corresponding compensation policies. It is not wrong for the staff to fulfill the target of returning farmland to farmland, but it is also necessary to take into account the interests of all parties, and it is not easy for farmers to farm land, and the cost of seeds and fertilizers is also in it, and the income of the whole year is in the field, and this kind of coercive method is really unkind.

1. Publicize the role of returning farmland to forestsSecond, the staff should be conscientiousCivil servants serve the people, and they must take into account the interests of the people in everything they do, and it is not easy for peasants to farm land, so they must think more about their livelihood. When the policy of returning farmland to forests is down, it is necessary to seize the critical period before spring ploughing, do a good job in the work of returning farmland to forests, and give appropriate compensation plans, so that it is a good solution.

3. Protect the ecological environmentProtecting the ecological environment is to protect our living space, which is the obligation of every citizen, not to kill wild animals, not to use pesticides, not to cut down forests, etc. It is imperative to return farmland to forests, but we must pay attention to ways and means.

What is the matter with the unfinished will be with the 10,000 acres of dresser here, I think.

In order to fulfill the target of returning farmland to forests, 10,000 mu of mature crops have been destroyed, and this is the crops planted by the common people in the sun and rain, and the state has done this for the sake of the common people at all, and it is only right that they should be severely punished.

The policy of not completing the quota of returning farmland and destroying 10,000 acres of vegetables and the country, but returning some good standards, and destroying the crops after three days of retirement, the heinous crimes they committed, the people of the whole country should condemn them, and the state should sanction them, this is the case, so we can't let this kind of thing happen again, otherwise our iron power will disappear.

In order to complete the target of returning farmland to forest, destroying 10,000 acres of mature crops, I think these people should be severely punished, the crops are ripe, you can slow down, let the people harvest the crops, and then replant can also destroy 8 million gold of wheat and rapeseed, this is purely for the interests of the common people, irresponsible behavior, they waste so much food, it is purely a crime, must be severely punished, do things to see the general direction, to proceed from interests, to respect the facts, this is right.

It is too cruel to return farmland to forests and destroy crops, and the people suffer losses, so there should be a reasonable explanation or compensation for economic losses for the people.

It is too undesirable to destroy 10,000 mu of fertile land in order to fulfill the target of returning farmland to farmland. In order to complete the mission, the damage to the environment is too great.

In order to achieve the task of returning farmland to forests issued by the state, Inner Mongolia has uprooted cultivated land that has not been contracted to return farmland to forests for planting trees.

In order to meet the target of returning farmland to forest, the city of Hulunbuir in Inner Mongolia destroyed crops that were about to ripen, causing serious losses. It is entirely possible to wait until the crops are harvested before planting trees.

It's deliberate, don't you want me to complete the target, then I'll destroy the crops and complete the target you want, I'm sorry, you have to carry the pot.

It is very stupid, it is incomprehensible to have such a practice in extraordinary times, and the loss of these crops is regrettable.

It is the local ** in order to fulfill the instructions of the superior leaders. Reckless. Resulting in the destruction of 10,000 acres of crops in one and. It's perfectly fine to return to the forest for the crops to be harvested. This is the hard-earned money of farmers. There must be an explanation for the local **.

Because it is a question of completing the return of farmland to forests, 10,000 acres of ripe crops have been returned to forests.

Returning farmland to farmland is a strategic policy for the benefit of future generations and mankind, and this is not negotiable. Imagine turning all the grasslands and lakes into farmland, and within a few years, the grasslands will turn into deserts, and the lake's ability to store water and resist floods will be lost. That's a big price.

Although there will definitely be corresponding compensation for the destruction of the banker, unless there is no legal formalities, and the individual will not be compensated for the indiscriminate occupation and reclamation. Returning farmland to forests and lakes is a great way to benefit the present and the future!

It's a less positive approach.

It was the behavior of Chen Balhu Banner in Hulunbuir City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, to eradicate more than 20,000 mu of wheat and rape that were about to ripen and to fulfill the target of returning farmland to forest, which was an extremely irresponsible manifestation of the interests of the common people.

In order to fulfill the target of returning farmland to forests, a region in Inner Mongolia shut down tens of thousands of acres of mature crops and destroyed tree planting.

This is the behavior of the relevant departments themselves to forcibly destroy the crops in disregard of the people for the sake of political performance, which has caused a very bad social impact.

In order to meet the target of returning farmland to farmland, the city of Hulunbuir in Inner Mongolia destroyed the crops that were about to ripen, which was a man-made tragedy. It is completely possible to wait for the crops to be harvested before planting trees.

I think this push is more indicator, if they destroy 10,000 acres of this crop, it is because they deliberately damaged it, so it is very unreasonable, they waste food.

The practice is wrong, although the local ** has issued an order to prohibit planting, but did not give a clear compensation ** out, and the local herdsmen because they do not know what the compensation ** is, they are afraid of reducing the harvest, so they planted, and many crops can be harvested in more than ten days, there is no need to destroy them in such a hurry.

No, this is disrespectful and bureaucratic for the hard work of the working people.

It is extremely undesirable to harm the interests of farmers for the sake of indicators, and these crops are already ripe, so why not the harvest is the first thing that comes to mind.

I don't think it's right to destroy 10,000 acres of ripe crops in order to achieve the so-called target, because there are still many people in this world who can't afford to eat, and even if they donate it to others, it's far better than destroying it directly.

When the crops are about to mature, destroying 10,000 acres of ripe crops just to fulfill the target of returning farmland is equivalent to wasting all the efforts that the peasants have put into these lands in vain.

These environmental protection policies formulated by our country will help our country develop better and create a better living environment for people. Protecting the ecological environment is protecting our homeland, and every citizen has the responsibility to protect our environment. Recently, in Inner Mongolia, "in order to complete the target of returning farmland to forests and destroying 10,000 acres of ripe crops" is worthy of our deep thought, returning farmland to forests is a major event that benefits the country and the people, but crops are also the foundation of peasants' lives, in this matter, I think it is caused by the staff of the relevant departments not handling the work of returning farmland to forests, and the problems that can be solved before spring ploughing can be solved can be solved for so long, and they have to not try.

First, we must think about the people

It is indeed wrong for the villagers to forcibly sow seeds after knowing the ban on sowing, but the relevant departments did not give a compensation policy and did not watch the villagers sow seeds, which is also a dereliction of duty in their work. It is not easy for farmers to farm, spring ploughing and sowing, weeding and turning the soil, etc., and they also have to bear the cost of seeds and fertilizers, and they can only have a meager income after a year of hard work. Civil servants are "servants of the people", and the villagers should be asked before making any decisions, and the deadline for returning farmland is imminent, but the crops are also about to ripen, and they should apply to their superiors for more time, which is the best of both worlds.

2. Adhere to the policy of returning farmland to forests

Returning farmland to forests is a major national plan, and we must vigorously support it. Returning farmland to forest can restore the ecology, increase the number and variety of wild animals and plants, and increase biodiversity. After China began to realize the imperative of protecting the ecological environment, it began to formulate various policies on ecological protection, such as setting fishing seasons, prohibiting the killing of wild animals, returning farmland to forests and grasslands, protecting wetlands, and other ecological decisions.

3. Protect the ecological environment

To protect the ecological environment and vigorously implement green development, we must always keep in mind the truth that "lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets", and we must not take the old road of pollution first. The state has always been a strong supporter of ecological protection, and it is necessary to closely follow national policies and protect the ecological environment. Personally, garbage sorting, using less disposable chopsticks, using less plastic bags, and not eating wild animals are all part of the environment's efforts.