What is both present and non existent? Does it exist or not?

It can be said that we cannot give a proper definition of "existence" - after all, no matter how we define it, we cannot get out of the quagmire of "circular definition". After thinking about it, I can only say that existence is a collective term for all things that contain energy or the law of Tao (the nature that energy follows to maintain its own stability, equivalent to "spirit").

Existence is divided into objective and subjective - subjective existence refers to the existence of a specific Dao body (a general term for all existences, or a specific existence) that exists only in the Dao Law; Objective existence refers to the existence of a particular Dao body in both the law of Tao and the energy.

Existence is existence; In other words, everything that exists, must exist—if it is not objective, then it is subjective.

For example, "ghosts and gods" only exist in people's consciousness and do not appear in reality, which is a typical subjective existence.

It is important to know that "non-existence" is absolute nothingness, which does not exist in the universe – even in the mind.

The controversy between Zhuangzi and Huizi over the "joy of fish" (see Zhuangzi Qiushui for details) also contains a reflection on "existence": since Huizi said that "the child is not a fish, and the joy of the fish is known", he must know the "joy of fish".

It's like someone asking, "How do you know there's a ghost?" If the person concerned does not know the word "there is a ghost", it must not be expressed—that is, only by knowing the existence of "ghost" (subjective existence) can one think about whether it exists (objective existence).

Normally, unless otherwise specified, the "existence" we are talking about refers only to objective existence, not to subjective existence.

Under certain conditions, the movement of things exists and does not exist at a specific moment. It is the unity of being and non-being.

Do you know Schrödinger's cat quantum superposition?

Existence exists, and the ruler does not exist without existence" which of the following views? （）a.Kant. b.Haig's old strappers.

c.Mai Squire Jane Lisso.

d.Stay in Quib.

Correct answer: c

"Existence" is about the state of human existence; Alive; Thus, "existence" refers to his actual state at the time of his self-introduction in the play. To "non-existent" is to consider non-existence: annihilation, that is, death.

Thus, he reflects on a choice due to his precarious situation and the moral bankruptcy around him.

His self-talk* also points to a kind of spiritual and moral self-doubt, the pain of one's own state of being. This question is a kind of self-introduction, no different from the inner dialogue that people reflect on in moments of contradiction. So he questions the choice between life and death, but in his monologue he waveres.

The fact that he seems to have chosen life over death suggests that Shakespeare used this speech to dramatize and show his inner struggle through his monologue, given the psychological condition in which he found himself. Shakespeare was a master of this new approach, which made his actors more realistic, rather than like cardboard cutouts, which many early medieval roles were required to play. Most, but not all, of the previous traits were based on "types", which were based on the four psychological traits that describe all human beings:

Bloody, mucus, irritable, melancholy. Hamlet exhibits several characteristics of these genres, which were relatively new concepts in the drama of the time.

Shakespeare gives Hamlet a deeper character. That's probably why, to this day, people are still curious about this extraordinary dialogue distilled from a play. The play is a profound stage technique and dramatic monologue that demonstrates Hamlet's state of mind beyond the simple "type".

Before this era, many monologues reflected the actor's intention to speak directly to the audience by raising a hand, mouth, and making them mentally state or intention of the actor (just as when we hold our hand to speak directly, but try to hide it from the opposite side of the other). In theater, until today, it is called "breaking the fourth wall", that is, the invisible wall between the actor and the audience, so when an actor directs his monologue of her (another male actor in a female role) to the audience, it is called breaking the fourth wall.

A soliloquy is a theatrical device in which a character stands alone on a stage and reveals his private thoughts to the audience, as if talking to himself.

1660 The first women to be allowed to legally ascend to power. William Shakespeare: born 1564, died 1616.

In fact, it refers to a thing, it may be the existence of your impression, but it is not really the actual existence, so sometimes there will be this reason, that is, existence or non-existence.

To exist is to have such a thing, and not to exist is to have no such thing.

Existence is a real thing, non-existence is a fictional thing, simple and straightforward.

Existence is what is in front of your eyes, and non-existence is something that is illusory.

This is a quote from Heidegger. First of all, we must understand, what is existence and what is being? Hai's.

It is believed that Western philosophical schools often replace existence with the existent, which leads to the forgetting of existence. For example, Plato's idea, Descartes's self-thought, Hegel's absolute spirit, etc., these categories are by no means beings, but only beings. Therefore, Hai points out that the being must be questioned, not the being.

This is Hai's famous ontological distinction.

So, how to question existence, Hai's view is that through the "here-and-now", that is, the existence of such a person as a person. Only by examining the existence of this existence and the state of human existence can we truly comprehend and grasp existence.

Heidegger also sees that many people do not find the above problem, and even if they do, they do not think that the problem is very important. Hai emphasized that this question is so fundamental and critical that it is the most central question of the whole metaphysics. Because, existence is obscured, forgotten, and this is the nihilization of existence.

What people have always seen is the being, but they cannot see the obscuration of existence, the nihilization of existence, which is the original meaning of this sentence: why does the existence exist but the non-existence does not exist.

Existence is absolute, and nothingness is relative.