Analyze the monitoring system scheme, please ask about the comparison of the three schemes of the mo

With DVR, there is no need to use a capture card. Because the capture card is used with the computer, the working interface is running on the Windows system. Computer crash, computer virus, etc. will directly affect the normal operation of monitoring, and its system stability is not as good as the embedded hard disk recorder!!

The ** of the line is slightly higher!! The normal retail price does not exceed Yuan Mi Yuan Mi That is the wholesale price Ordinary customers cannot enjoy this**. In addition, there is no charge for the power supply of the camera.

Although there is no specific model of the equipment, it can be seen from the cost of the equipment that your equipment is a basic ordinary device, and the camera is estimated to be within 480 lines. The video playback screen is estimated to be in CIF format. The camera is 4 meters away Your video playback can only distinguish the physical appearance and gender, and the specific facial features cannot be distinguished.

You can see motorcycles during the day, but you can't see the license plates, that's for sure. But in general, it is easy to use, the cost is reasonable, the working screen requirements are not strict, and it can be used completely.

The four-way capture card is about 220 yuan. (Bolzoca).The infrared camera is about 200 yuan, and if you want to save money, you can buy it yourself and install it yourself.

There is no technical content in installing two monitors) to do this ** for the security company is not expensive, people always have to make money.

I personally think that this three sets of plans are not perfect,Reason:The first plan can display 42 pictures of three video recorders (the actual display is 48 screens),The disadvantage is:It is more troublesome to adjust the picture。

The third plan: it is necessary to call up the video one by one when recording, which is more troublesome, and you must be upset after a long time. Second option:

It's similar to the third plan, that is, there is one more multi-** management host.

I don't know what your on-site needs are. Roughly what kind of functionality is to be implemented.

My personal opinion is: integrate the first and second options; It is as follows: the system equipment selects 3 sets of 16-channel digital DVRs and 1 set of 6-zone intrusion alarm hosts, configures 3 sets of 19" color displays to connect with digital DVRs, and then uses the management host (in fact, it is a computer + matrix card), and uses the network switch to network the 3 digital DVRs and the management host.

Then the management host collects its 42 images, and enlarges each of the images to be enlarged to a 21" color monitor (it can be like a monitor, depending on your economic strength). I think that's a little bit more reasonable.

The first plan and all the equipment are available to meet your requirements. The second and third schemes are incomprehensible. The equipment is clearly not enough.

Hello, a complete monitoring system mainly includes:

1. Front-end equipment: cameras (network type, hemispherical type, pinhole type, standard gun type, integrated type, industrial type, etc.).

2. Transmission equipment: optical fiber.

3. Control equipment: DVR or capture card, etc.

Fourth, the display device: the monitor or the splicing screen.

According to the actual situation, how many meters or how much area or find key parts to lay probes or monitors, and take into account the characteristics of the instrument itself.

Hardware matching combined with customer site requirements.

That's a pretty simple question, isn't it? Small, just a few cameras, a video recorder or a computer! The large one has a center console!

Motion detection, zoom, aperture, and more! The latest monitoring arrangement can set up a wireless base station with a wireless IP camera and a collection computer! Wiring-free.