Can artificial life transplant or create like minded people?

Hello! Your creative thinking is worthy of admiration! For research institutes and scientists, "artificial life" not only enables artificial cells to produce offspring, but also makes chemicals that engineers can't.

In this way, people can order cells that are used to repair wounds in the body, remove pollutants, clean blood vessels, etc... If artificial life is successful, many of the problems encountered by modern engineering will also be solved. Rasmasson of Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States also said:

Once we have made entities that can replicate themselves, and can program them, then we will be able to do a lot of useful things ...

Didn't you see it! That artificial life is bacteria! Can bacteria replace you!

Are you kidding.. Don't want a woman. We men are yy every day

You don't have to get married, but women still have to have drops.

Unless men don't want JJ.

Analysis: It can be said that organ transplantation is the key to the development of the current medical community, but the brain cannot be transplanted

Analysis: Hello, as far as the current level of medical technology is concerned, the brain cannot be transplanted, but whether it can be done in the future is not yet daring, because many people in the past have done impossible things now.

The current medical technology has not yet developed to that point, and there is still Einstein's brain preserved, and if it could be transplanted, it is estimated that a second Einstein would have been created long ago. According to research, the lifespan of the brain is about 110,185 years, but the longevity of the brain is useless, and humans eventually die because the heart stops beating, not because the brain does not function.

In this case, it is best to go to a hospital where you can check for surgery**. It can also be used in conjunction with traditional Chinese medicine for syndrome differentiation and traditional Chinese medicine.

Disease analysis: According to the current medical technology, it can be said that the brain cannot be transplanted, and other organs can be transplanted, such as the heart, liver and kidney.

Suggestions:

Unfortunately, the current technology is not up to the mark. The brain is the most delicate and complex organ of the human body, and people's understanding of it is still very limited, not to mention the dense blood vessels like spider webs, the severing and reconstruction of the nervous system alone is enough to collapse most surgeons, for example, after the severed finger is reconnected, the movement is still limited, let alone the brain.

No, it can't be, if there is no accident, no matter how long it takes, the brain will not strike.

The current technology can't!

Your idea is wonderful! Good luck!

I'm very interested in this, and I'm wondering if I can continue my life forever.

The rebirth of the other is still in the dead, please?

Yes, I also transplanted it.

According to my inference, human consciousness does not exist, and all the mechanisms of cell operation are natural physical and chemical reactions, so if a brain is divided into two, it will become two consciousness subjects. And if the two brains can be connected, the two bodies of consciousness will merge into one.

Therefore, your so-called thoughts, personalities, memories, emotions, knowledge, and abilities are not unified, they can exist separately and can be infinitely subdivided. That is, if the transplant process is not perfect, then you may retain some of your original consciousness, for example, if only your personality is transplanted, but your emotional or linguistic abilities are gone. It should be like you're half-asleep.

But because of the natural adaptation after the transplant, even though you are only partially transplanted, soon the new individual will think that he or she is perfect, just as a drunk person never says he is not drunk.

There is a Buddhist saying that the self (alayya) exists independently of the first seven consciousnesses. This can be explained by the fact that the self exists, that is, man has a soul, it has no size, no past or future, it is both individual but also unified, but permanent. It doesn't have the specific characteristics of a particular life, but it contains all the hidden knowledge of past lives, in short, it's too hard to say.

Also, my understanding is hard to say that it is correct, you can do it yourself.

This statement is so fresh, and it is estimated that it will be okay when science develops to a certain stage.

Your ideas are very innovative, memory transplantation may work, but it is difficult to transplant personality, of course it is difficult to transplant thinking, how to say that the human brain is different, it is impossible to move all of them, at least my generation can't see it.

I think in the near future, memory transplantation will happen

In fact, there are many things in the world that cannot be explained. Some people say yes, and people say no. 100 years ago, people said that going to the moon was only a distant myth, but now? :

Therefore, there are some things in the world that depend on the future development of mankind.

Brain transplantation is the most, and life still needs some time to study.

I've thought about this before, but it's impossible with current science and technology.

No, if it is not allowed to rely on any biological raw materials, start completely from scratch and create life using only the basic elements of the universe. No, it requires a lot of computation, and no computer in the world today can do it, and it has that unpredictable consequence.

No, at present, only biomacromolecules such as insulin can be synthesized artificially, or with amino acids, which are not the most basic elements. We are not yet able to synthesize active macromolecules from the elements. It's too far away from what you said, only by making a cell can we create life, we can only make its secretions.

Yes, but it's hard, and the recent "artificial life" was realized by altering the genes of Mycoplasma, so it doesn't meet your qualifications. If only elemental elements are used, the synthesis of organic macromolecules is probably the most difficult step.

Now you can't, at most, you can only use some methane, nitrogen and other ordinary raw materials to make amino acids, and then make biological macromolecules

Cloning pigs, I don't know if it's an artificial life.

Viruses are the simplest life, it is between life and organic matter, it is able to reproduce and survive, cannot parasitize alone, has no cell structure, only nucleic acid and protein shell, has no life activity outside the cell, and can form crystals. A synthetic virus is really just a chemical that can replicate its own nucleic acids and produce proteins in cells.

It should be said that human beings have taken a step towards synthetic life on the basis of artificial synthesis of proteins and nucleic acids.

Attempts to synthesize viruses make us more aware of the mysteries of life, and may also help us find efficient ways to kill viruses and diseases.

I guess it made life. There is no absolute boundary between life and non-life. Viruses are in this critical state, having the characteristics of living things under certain conditions, and being like non-living things under certain conditions.

Such research should be affirmed. This is the exploration of human beings to understand the nature of life and understand the mysteries of nature. Its results can contribute to the improvement of disease and the quality of the population.

There may be people who use scientific results to do things that harm human beings, but this is not the fault of science itself, and it should not be prevented by means of blocking the development of science. On the contrary, the more advanced human science is, the more capable it is to defeat these people with ulterior motives. - Because the bad guys have **, so the good guys have to have more advanced **.

It should be said that the nucleic acid foundation of gongzygou-like proteins is progressing towards synthesis.

The TCCIC virus attempt has made me more demystified, and it can help me find a disease that kills the virus with high efficiency.

I thought that the virus was originally part of the cell structure, because without the cell, the virus could not replicate, and it should have appeared later than the cell. In this respect, viruses and mitochondria are similar. So I don't think viruses are life.