Those who understand the Fa come in 100, what does it mean to understand the Fa

Well, I'm not a lawyer, but I've studied law

In principle, if the woman does not agree, she cannot leave However, if the conditions are sufficient, you can also divorce through the court

After the divorce, the child is awarded to one party, and the other party pays alimony

If they can't leave, the man can also ask the woman to pay alimony

Everything has to wait for the woman to come back, you can think of a way to let the woman go home first and then discuss slowly, if the discussion is not good, then go to the court, as for how to judge, you can negotiate,,, the main thing is to ask the woman to go home,

It's so difficult, even though I'm studying law, but I don't know much about it

Depending on how you ask for it, for example, if you want to have children, you can make that request, and you can also ask for child support from the time the woman works outside the home until the time you get divorced, and if the woman doesn't come back or doesn't agree, you can ask the court to grant a divorce, because the woman has not fulfilled her obligation to raise the child.

The law is to deeply understand the content and meaning of the law.

To know the law is to understand and know all kinds of laws and regulations.

To abide by the law is to exercise one's rights and fulfill one's obligations in strict accordance with the law.

Usage means that the legal rights and freedoms of others will be fully respected; Actively seek legal means to resolve disputes and disputes, and consciously use the law to protect their legitimate rights and interests; will take the initiative to resist acts that undermine law and order.

The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle once said, "Law is order, and good law is good order." "Yes, the state has its own laws, and the family has its own rules, and only the law can realize the rights and obligations of citizens, and in order for society to progress, it is necessary to have a sound legal system.

Today's society is a society governed by the rule of law. ,.. as a modern citizen

Categories: Social Livelihood >> Law.

Problem Description: Excuse me. A secretly drank the poison that B was going to kill himself and died.

B is guilty of not breaking the law. A didn't know it was poison, and B didn't let him drink it).

Analysis: B is the crime of intentional homicide.

There are a lot of practical cases, and I can't give you practical examples without the information at hand. But in pure theory, it can be understood in this way:

Intentional intent is to mean that the result is urgently hoped to happen, while objective intent is to indicate that the result will occur but not to stop it, and to allow the harmful result to occur.

It is clear that B's conduct was a standard objective intention, and in terms of the subjective aspect of the crime in the composition of the crime, he had already committed intentional homicide. The statutory charge is: intentional homicide.

If it's a real thing around you, then from a defense point of view:

Proceeding from B's interests: You can grasp the objective and intentional facts and the performance after committing the crime, emphasizing that B did not discover A's behavior at all as a defense of innocence, or make a defense of lesser guilt from the perspective that you have a good relationship with A and subjectively do not want the result to happen and are very remorseful. It is advisable to use a lesser guilty plea, which can be sentenced to several years, and if the defense is so good that it is difficult to ask for a suspended sentence.

If the defense of innocence is successful, if it fails, it is a second best thing, because the judge will not trust B's defense in the formation of mental evidence, thinking that B lied to him before and not in B's defense after that. But B is already a person who wants to commit suicide, so Chan Chun shouldn't care about the result.

If it is from A's point of view, the fact of the existence of this damage result and the skill of moving emotions should be repeatedly emphasized, so that the judge feels that the impact of B's death on his family is incalculable. In this way, Jia Ke cannot be sentenced to a heavy sentence (about 6 years of death, because this is the case in a large number of cases), but he can get a lot of compensation. In addition, there is a principle in criminal law that if a criminal suspect serves a sentence, moral compensation cannot be paid to the victim.

This is based on the fact that the convict has already given the family of the deceased the greatest spiritual comfort by restricting his personal freedom after serving his sentence, so it is not supplemented by moral compensation.

By the way, the manslaughter mentioned by the two of them is not established, because in terms of the composition of the crime of manslaughter, the objective aspect of the crime must be that the perpetrator has taken the initiative to act, and because his behavior has caused direct damage, it is obvious that B did not have any act in this case. Manslaughter is not established.

Since this amount is a wage arrears that should have been paid but not paid, the enforcement of the arbitration conclusion should be ordered.

If the company is not satisfied with the arbitration, it can file a lawsuit in the court, go through the litigation procedure, and finally obey the litigation judgment.

There was no procedural impropriety, but the issue was a breach of contract, and a change in business mode was not a reason for breach of contract and non-compensation. The only thing that can be discontinued from the original agreement is the declaration of bankruptcy, otherwise the normal procedures should be followed.