It is said that Qin Shi Huang burned books and pit Confucianism, so where did the current Analects c

The book "Analects" was originally burned by Qin Shi Huang. But later, some people claimed that there was still a copy in the cracks of the wall (at that time, it was still bamboo, and it seemed inappropriate to call it a book, so it was called so for the time being). The Analects we see now are all copies of the one in the gap, and the archaeological community has not found any Analects earlier than the time of Qin Shi Huang, so it cannot be confirmed.

Qin Shi Huang burned books and pit Confucianism, stipulating: In addition to the literature managed by the doctor's management office, those who have private collections of "poems", "books", and hundred languages in the world must be handed over to be burned; Anyone who dared to discuss the poems and books in private was sentenced to death.

Therefore, not all Confucian books were burned, and the current Analects were preserved by the historians of the Qin Dynasty.

Selected from Senior Secondary History Compulsory 3.

This shows that Qin Shi Huang did not exterminate Confucianism, and that Qin Shi Huang was a famous monarch.

The aim is to strengthen thought control.

It's not like this, only some of the pre-Qin historical books died in the "book burning pit Confucianism", and some were left behind.

Qin Shi Huang did "burn books and pit Confucianism", but that was because of the contradiction between Confucianism and Legalism, which led to the Legalist representatives headed by Li Si admonishing Qin Shi Huang and carrying out "book burning", but what was burned were all folk books, not including the many books collected in the Qin Palace, and then through the Legalist people's framing and slandering of the Confucian Feng family, it led to Qin Shi Huang's "pit Confucianism", but it was only a small number of Confucian students in the Qin Palace. It is impossible for such a level of book burning and Confucianism to make all the pre-Qin classics extinct.

This statement is correct, all the historical books of the pre-Qin period were burned during the period of the book burning pit and the Confucian fiber accompanied the roll, there is indeed such a statement, and I think this ruined statement is very credible.

It is true, Qin Shi Huang's book burning pit Confucianism is proven by real history, in order to consolidate his power, he killed nearly 1,000 Confucian students and burned many classics.

It must be true, this is a suggestion made by Lis, and it is recorded in the annals.

From a historical point of view, this is true, and there are traces to follow.