Is a lively conversation a sick sentence?

It is a sick sentence, and "excited" and "smooth" are redundant, and "talking" can be changed to "talking" or "excited" can be removed.

It's a sick sentence. There are two things that need to be changed. The first place is the repetition of semantics in the excitement and the conversation. The second place is:"of"The wording is inaccurate, it should be"land"。Sick sentences can be changed to talk with interest.

It's not a language disease. Enthusiasm is the mental state of the individual, and talking freely is focused on talking to the fullest.

Be. Talk: Talk happily.

Interested: The interest is high and the mood is excited.

First, correct one word: the particle "of" should be replaced by "earth". Because according to the norm, the connecting predicate and the central word are "of", and the connecting adverbial and the central word is "ground". "Interested" is a state of "talking", an adverbial of a predicate, and "ground" must be used.

"Talking with interest" is a phrase with a positive structure (in the middle), and there is nothing wrong with it. But a phrase is not the same as a sentence, a sentence requires a complete expression of something, and the subject-verb-object needs to be complete. In specific cases, the subject or object can be omitted, as in "He doesn't eat chicken."

The subject "don't eat chicken" can be omitted and the object "he doesn't eat" can be omitted, but both the subject and the object cannot be omitted.

If used as a sentence, "to talk with interest" must be supplemented with a subject or object, or a tense particle added. For example: "They are talking in high spirits"; "Talk about your feelings with great interest"; "Talking with great interest".

1.This issue has aroused extensive discussion among teachers and students. The broad modifier here is the noun. Because the sentence component is "the question (subject) causes the (predicate) discussion (object)", and the object is a noun.

2.The teacher solicited the opinions of the students extensively. It is the verb that is extensively modified here. The sentence structure consists of:"The teacher asks for advice"The subject-verb-object structure is extensively modified by a predicate, while a predicate is a verb.

Hope you understand!

The question you are talking about belongs to the category of language.

Here's what I think—

1. "Everyone can freely express their opinions", we often say this in spoken language, but only in spoken language.

2. In the written language, it seems to be not very standardized, and the semantics of "speak freely" and "publish" are repeated.

3. Modification: Everyone can freely express their opinions.

The above views are for your reference.

Personally, I don't think it's a sick sentence, and everyone freely expresses their opinions. No problem. Doesn't speaking freely conflict with your own opinions? So it's not a sick sentence.

This sentence is a sick sentence. The meaning of the idiom is to freely express one's own opinions, which is semantically repeated with the later one's own opinions. This sentence makes the mistake of semantic redundancy.

But if you don't analyze it carefully, you won't find this semantic error, because it reads smoothly.

Personally, I think there is nothing wrong with it, speaking freely means saying what you want to say, and the whole means that everyone should not keep expressing their own opinions, and that they should express everything they want to express within a specific scope (only themselves).

It's a sick sentence. It is inappropriate to speak freely as an adjective here.

This sentence is not smooth, and the meaning of speaking freely and expressing one's own opinion is repeated.

It should be changed to: everyone can speak freely and express their own opinions.

This sentence is a sick sentence and is repeated.

Changed to allow everyone to express their opinions.

Speaking freely means saying what you want to say without inhibitions. This sentence is repeated, and the words "express one's own opinions" are deleted.

I didn't know what was wrong with my language.