Does Iron Man violate physics? Did Iron Man break physics

Updated on science 2024-05-25
42 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    It may not violate the laws of physics, but the current technology has not been reached, and I hope that in the future, when science and technology are developed, equipment like Iron Man can be created, then space exploration will not be a problem.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Movies naturally conform to the principles of physics, and there are also those that do not conform to the principles of physics, such as the principle that Iron Man flies to a high altitude and is frozen in line with the principles of physics, but Iron Man's level flight at high altitude is a bit difficult to achieve under current science.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    There are many places in Iron Man that are consistent with real physical science, of course, as a science fiction movie, there must be an element of imagination, so naturally there are places that people can't accept now.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Compared to his teammates, he is the most physics-oriented.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Iron Man is estimated to be dead if a normal person is so fast with such a fast acceleration, so Iron Man is very inconsistent with physical common sense.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Iron Man himself is a mortal and a little different from other superheroes, so falling around during the fight won't be a brain** or something.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Iron Man flying, the ejector of the foot is the main flight power, and the ejector in the hand is mainly to grasp the balance, don't you see that when Iron Man wants to pause the flight and stand upright on the ground when he is flying flat, he has to spray his hands forward, which is to master the balance. At the end of Iron Man 3, when the Iron Army came, the leading mk15 Heart Breaker sprayed his hand forward when he flew over, and then the entire armor stood firm in the air, Iron Man has a tail behind him, and he must open the turn to master the balance when flying.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I think Iron Man's energy ** is very unreasonable, according to the TV should have a very small jet engine, this has to have a nuclear reactor to achieve so much energy**.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    violation, but the movie is born from life above life.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It can't be said that it violates the principles of physics, but the current materials and technologies can't reach it for the time being.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Iron Man's clothes are safe and tights, if it is a high temperature, there must be no protective measures for the collision, but the association of hard steel and protective performance is very good, but in fact, it can't achieve such an effect.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Why is Iron Man so welcome??? It's because he was just an ordinary person before, and he forced himself to develop black technology in order to save the victims, Avengers 123 Everyone should have seen it, except for Stark, who can be willing to sacrifice themselves to save the world, I am a Marvel fan, and the one I admire the most is Tony, he may only occasionally be rich and willful, and it was Tony who saved Marvel!! The Iron Warframe may be a bit illogical, but everyone needs this person in their hearts!

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    If the Ark reactor were converted into an antimatter storage device, it might still be physical, but either a nuclear reactor or a fusion device would be able to shrink that small.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    It can't be said that he violates physics, it can only be said that the physics rules of the Marvel Universe and our universe are slightly different.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    It seems that Captain America conforms to physics, in Avengers 1, the American team jumps from a plane several kilometers high and can withstand the impact with a shield, which is in line with science?

    So it's just a movie, don't take it too seriously.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Iron Man's energy source is similar to a tokamak device, and the thrusters are probably vector engines or ion thrusters, but the reality is that it can't be scaled down to that small size and provide that much power output, just like the original reactor in Steel 1 with a power of 5 billion joules per second, and according to the limits of the human body, even in armor, it is impossible to fly at supersonic speeds like in the movies.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Many of them violate the current laws of physics, such as flying, Iron Man only has a rear-jet engine, and there is no way to get upward thrust according to aerodynamics, and fighting, which does not conform to the law of acceleration

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Are you talking about physics at Marvel? Think of the captain's shield, the hammer god's meow hammer, the forgive the lustful giant's pants, and Ant-Man's abilities.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Controlled nuclear fusion technology has not yet been achieved by mankind for at least the next 50 years, and Iron Man can only be regarded as a fantasy, which does violate physics

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Don't you see that the inside of Iron Man's armor has a shock-absorbing honeycomb structure? However, these are not important, handsome, good-looking is the king, otherwise what movie to watch.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Compared to his teammates, he was reasonable.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    I think, in the small aspect, in Team America 3, the little spider said that Team America's shield does not conform to the laws of physics. Then the American team laughed and said, "Kid, there are still many things you don't understand. It shows that there are many people who do not meet the requirements in the women's federation.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    I can accept Iron Man, I don't understand the War Machine, I can't fight much more than Tony's armor, where are so many bullets and missiles?

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    In a team like the Avengers, Iron Man is already a model of science.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    It's still normal, it's really violating the shield of the American team, and you can fly out casually** and no**!

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Movies are movies after all, and the things he uses must be against physics, and we just have fun watching them.

    Iron Man must be a household name. Iron Man said that his reactor can output 3 billion joules of energy in one second, 3 billion joules is about 833 kilowatt hours, that is, 833 kilowatt hours of electricity, a 15-watt light bulb can be used for six years if it is turned on for 24 hours, a kilowatt air conditioner can be used for 29 days if it is turned on for 24 hours, and the Tesla of 85kw h counts the loss, it takes 100 kilowatt-hours of electricity to fully charge from zero, and it can be charged more than eight times, Iron Man only needs one second, assuming that the electricity bill is one kilowatt-hour of electricity and Tony sells all the electricity. Then the yuan for one day is, 833 3600 24 35985600 yuan.

    Money printing machines aren't that fast. What kind of arms does Stark Industries sell, buying several power stations and transforming them into Ark power generation, which is a proper profiteering.

    It is more intuitive to say that the success rate of the exchange is more intuitive, so let's also take a look at how the numbers compare. Based on 3 billion joules per second, the power of the Ark is 30GW and 3 million kilowatts. Here are some numbers, of course, we also have to consider the energy conversion efficiency, to maintain the fusion reaction also needs energy anyway, this volume, this power is still out of reach for human beings, not to mention the volume, the current human direction is only controllable thermonuclear fusion, cold nuclear fusion has not yet had an exact direction to achieve, there is still a long way to go.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    It's definitely against physics, it's not very scientific, but science fiction is not real in the first place, it's a kind of imagination of people.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    This is a science fiction movie, and it can't be said whether it violates physics or not, after all, technology has not reached this level now, and whether there will be such technology in the future, or more than such technology, this can only wait slowly.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Regarding this issue, it seems that some scenes in the movie have been simulated and analyzed, and some explanations and analyses have been made. Some of the analyses are incomprehensible, but even if they don't analyze so much, people with a little common sense can see that they don't fit. But even so, so what, it doesn't hurt the big thing, because the setting of the comic, the most important thing is to be interesting, and fun can make people addicted.

    And high-end superhero lovers can even write such a book to rely on superheroes to popularize physics, isn't it a very interesting thing? Therefore, there is no need to be too serious and strive for perfection.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    No, he is in the world of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, their level of technology is more developed, physics is different from the world we live in, and Tony's IQ is already very high.

  31. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Most of it is violated, but this is just science fiction not science, which promotes science.

  32. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    When Marvel was filming "Iron Man", the company was very sluggish and facing the danger of bankruptcy, so it made a desperate bet and chose Robert Downey Jr. as the protagonist to invest in the filming of "Iron Man", which achieved a global box office of 100 million US dollars and achieved great success, and the MCU also began!

    So, why Iron Man?

    But the rights to Spider-Man and X-Men were all sold.

    Let's start with the Hulk. In 2003, Ang Lee filmed a Hulk, but unfortunately the box office performance was not particularly good, and the box office was relatively unsuccessful, which was a problem that the producer had to consider.

    Look at Captain America again. In the comics, the popularity of the American team is indeed high, and it is very high.

    But the background setting of the American team has to be placed during World War II. The appeal of World War II to young people today can only be said to be getting weaker and weaker.

    But the project of "Iron Man 1" should be before 2007, and the release time is 2008. What happened in the United States or the world in those years? The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the fight against terrorism. What is the setting of Iron Man 1?

    Although the movie doesn't say it explicitly, it's clear that it's somewhere in the Middle East. An American arms tycoon was kidnapped by a group of ****** in the desert of a country in the Middle East. As a result, Iron Man 1 is very cleverly linked to Afghanistan, Iraq, and anti-terrorism, which is very in line with the background of the times at that time, and its popularity will be greatly increased.

    In addition, in terms of viewing experience, I believe that many viewers are already very tired of the perfect aura of the protagonist, and they will bless the main theme at every turn. And Captain America is that type. , a protagonist who is full of a sense of justice, a spiritual symbol, patriotic feelings, I guess it will be difficult to gain everyone's favor.

    The down-and-out Marvel chose Robert Downey Jr., who was at a low point in his life, as the male lead and starred in "Iron Man".

    However, such a gamble was really successful. Marvel was an instant hit, Downey was also an instant hit, and superhero movies began to be launched one after another.

    And what about Robert Downey Jr.? starred in "Iron Man", he only had a salary of 500,000 US dollars, and the current "Avengers 3" is said to be paid hundreds of millions!!

  33. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    With the existing support is violated, who knows what about the technology in the future.

  34. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    Iron Man just feels very exciting, as for whether it violates physics, it's not clear, I think it's okay to look good.

  35. Anonymous users2024-01-08

    Of course not, after all, his regenerated armor does not conform to the laws of mass constancy.

  36. Anonymous users2024-01-07

    A lot of things in science fiction go against physics.

  37. Anonymous users2024-01-06

    Actually, it's just a movie, don't take it seriously.

  38. Anonymous users2024-01-05

    He originally belonged to the heroes in Marvel, and there was no need to use physics to study him.

  39. Anonymous users2024-01-04

    Reversing time to the past is itself an anti-physical principle, and even if it can really be crossed, it must meet certain rules, such as not being able to change the past.

    But science fiction movies want artistic effects, and everything is boring if everything is based on physics.

  40. Anonymous users2024-01-03

    It's a lot to learn from, and the idea is really good.

  41. Anonymous users2024-01-02

    Don't ask, ask about high technology, ask is that the current civilization technology is not enough.

  42. Anonymous users2024-01-01

    Saying that Iron Man violates physics is itself a false proposition, Iron Man was originally a movie based on comics, virtual, I see many people on the Internet raising the bar and saying how much power does Iron Man consume when he flies, the nuclear reactor cannot be placed in the battle armor, the battle armor is too invincible and unscientific, etc., here is a paragraph: or let you eat too much.

    If you have to be more serious, then Superman will also be tragic, Captain America, Spider-Man, Hulk and Transformers can't be explained, they can't exist at all. Our Chinese mythological characters such as Monkey King and Nezha are even more impossible, and they are even more contrary to physics and common sense. Comics and movies are to entertain the public, and it is not interesting to have to drill the horns and raise the bar so much.

Related questions
2 answers2024-05-25

There are 51 of them, because what you just saw was two years ago.

7 answers2024-05-25

There are three installments in the Iron Man series. >>>More

5 answers2024-05-25

Avengers 4 has been in theaters for a while, and it shouldn't be a spoiler to talk about the story of "Avengers 4" now, because real Marvel fans should have watched "Avengers 4" several times. >>>More

7 answers2024-05-25

Iron Man is a superhero under the Marvel Comics umbrella. In 2008, the first part of "Iron Man" was released, which was the beginning of the "Marvel Cinematic Universe". actor Robert Downey Jr., who plays the protagonist Tony Stark, also known as Iron Man. >>>More

16 answers2024-05-25

Iron Man and Pepper are not together, Iron Man is dead, leaving Pepper alone in this world, they love each other deeply, Pepper is very sad after Iron Man leaves, the two have experienced a lot of things together, and finally know each other's minds, come together, but they can't stay together, and finally life and death are separated. >>>More