Do differences in social experience lead to breakups?

If two people have very different living backgrounds, family conditions, and social experiences, they can't be well together. There are definitely a lot of disputes. Those who can be together well are generally two people with the same conditions in all aspects.

Not everyone will break up because of these differences, but you have to work hard to be together in such a situation.

Yes. But if he really loves you or you really love her, you will both change for each other. I wish you happiness.

The difference in experience is not a problem at all, it is just a personal opinion of things, and it does not mean anything.

If you use this as an excuse just to show that you don't want to get to know each other, that's the problem, not the difference.

If you talk about the difference in social experience, if you have enough social experience, you will naturally know what you should want and what you don't want, you will not hesitate, everything will be done very well, or consider your own problems.

This is a difficult question, mainly because you provide too few factors.

As far as social reality is concerned, there are breakups in various situations, and sometimes the pair that is not optimistic will also combine, do their best, and the two sides will separate if they are not together, and there is no need to force it. The key is to feel happy and happy.

For example, a shameless person like me can easily say love, I kiss you, hug you, I like you so much, and so on. But some people think I'm disgusting. Like you.

Primitive societies (the longest) had matrilineal clans, and later patrilineal clans, from the public world to the family world, and at that time everyone was basically equal.

Slave societies gave rise to classes, two opposing classes, slave owners and slaves.

Slave Owners Exploit Slaves to the Maximum Slaves have no rights or freedoms.

And you can take it to the ** market to sell.

Feudal society: From the Shang Dynasty to the reform of the law, there was a feudal germination, and later in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period.

There was a class of landlords and peasants, and the landlord class exploited the peasants as much as they could, but the peasants were much freer than slaves, and they had their own farmland, but it was not enough at all, and the vast majority of them were peasants in China at that time.

But the vast majority of farmland belongs to a small number of landlords, so they can only endure exploitation by landlords.

Originally, they wanted to go to the capitalist society, but China's feudal mentality was deeply rooted, most of them were still peasants, there was not much proletariat, there was very little bourgeoisie, and most of the ruling class were still landlords.

So the bourgeois revolution led by Sun Yat-sen was not completely successful in China.

Socialist society, there are only four countries in the world that are in this society, China is the largest, then there is North Korea, and there is Cuba, and finally I don't remember very clearly, anyway, it is Vietnam, which small country is talking about the leadership of the workers' and peasants' alliance class.

Now it is a new type of socialism, since Grandpa Deng proposed reform and opening up, and slowly changed from a planned economy to a market economy, and there is also one country, two systems.

It has experienced slave society, feudal society, and capitalist society. Now for the last one.

Primitive society, slave society, feudal society, and now socialist society.

Primitive societies were self-sufficient.

Slave society Some people were oppressed.

The feudal society lasted the longest and made China backward in the later period.

Socialist Society China has not experienced a direct transition from capitalist society to the primary stage of socialism.

Primitive society: there is no hierarchy.

Slave society: The slave owner has complete possession of the slave.

Feudal society: the landlords lent money to the peasants to exploit them.

Capitalist society: capitalists exploit workers.

Socialist society: the alliance of workers and peasants.

The first social division of labor gave rise to agriculture, followed by matrilineal clan societies.

The second social division of labor gave rise to handicrafts, after which patrilineal clan societies arose.

1. Serfs.

Serfdom originated in the republican period of ancient Rome (509-27 BC). In the Middle Ages, serfdom prevailed in various European countries. Serfdom in Western Europe was basically formed around the tenth century.

With the development of the commodity economy, especially because of serf revolts and large-scale uprisings, serfdom gradually disintegrated. In the 15th century, most countries in Western Europe basically abolished serfdom, while Eastern European countries such as Russia did not abolish serfdom until the 19th century, but the remnants still exist.

2. Feudalism. After the fall of Western Rome, social turmoil, the collapse of slave society, new changes appeared in the pattern of the European world, and then ushered in a series of reforms of the new regime, the establishment of a new economic system, and the beginning of European feudal society. Domestic historians generally believe that the time when the feudal system was established in Western Europe was.

In the ninth and tenth centuries, the main basis was the Edict of the Querces of 877. In the fifteenth century, serfdom was abolished in most European countries, and feudal society also declined and perished.

5 The 10th century, the formative period of feudalism in Western Europe (the period of feudalization);

11 The 14th century, the period of the heyday of feudalism in Western Europe;

14 The 15th century, a period of crisis for feudalism in Western Europe;

In general, the millennium of European feudal society (5th - 15th centuries) is called "Middle Ages". Unlike Chinese feudal society, European feudal society was characterized by the flourishing of serfdom.

Serfdom in Europe probably lasted until the fall of the Western Roman Empire (476 AD), and then gradually transitioned to feudal society, and ended in the 14th century when the Renaissance European feudal society came to an end.

Time just proves everything, but time can't change everything. The history of serf societies in Europe is very long.

Because you don't want to start over, would you rather settle for the bad quality of your current relationship? An ambiguous person who knows you behind your back, do you think he has you in his eyes? You can't even get into his eyes, do you think he loves you?

Why bother to be afraid of the unknown future to settle for a love that does not bring you enjoyment. Wishing happiness.

In fact, if he proposes to break up with you, then he just doesn't love you anymore, so you don't want to reconcile with him anymore, because he has a new girlfriend (if he doesn't have a new girlfriend, maybe there is still hope), she is stepping on two boats. You're going to be sad and sad. Divide it.

Don't be stupid, if you don't love, you don't love, not everything is arranged by you, you can strive for your own happiness, but you can't interfere with or stop other people's things.

Such a man must still be very complicated now, and he doesn't know which one you and that woman should choose, so you show your charm, at least let him feel that you are sincerely willing to be by his side.

I think no matter what kind of man he is, he will actually want to have a woman who supports him and stands by his side.

Alas, why should you? Paying so much ...... for a man

Find someone who loves you, or you love, smart women should understand.

Don't be so stubborn and find your true destiny.

Why bother? What you have to do is turn around, leave, and start a new journey. No man will die.

He also said that whatever I wanted, I would not divide if I did not divide. "It's all said about this, you can't see it clearly, or in fact, you don't want to accept this reality, for your current situation, I personally think you are also responsible, to understand him, to grasp his heart, now... You think clearly!

How many people in school, how many people in society, everyone is a frog at the bottom of the well in school, and there will be more and better people in society Why waste time in school learning?

In the early stage of human society, the social productivity was very low, and there was only a natural division of labor according to gender and age within the primitive population, and there was no social division of labor. Driven by the continuous development of the productive forces, there have been three great social divisions of labor, and each of them has promoted the development of production and commodity exchange. 1. The First Great Social Division of Labor The first great social division of labor occurred in the late period of primitive society, which refers to the separation of nomadic tribes from other tribes.

Prior to this, exchange was only an accidental phenomenon, and after the emergence of the nomadic tribe, it produced not only more living materials than other primitive tribes, but also different types, thus making regular exchange possible. This great division of labor gave a strong impetus to the development of commodity exchange and also provided a material basis for the emergence of private ownership. 2. The Second Great Social Division of Labor The second great social division of labor refers to the separation of handicrafts from agriculture and occurred at the end of primitive society.

With the development of productive forces, especially the adoption of metal tools, a variety of handicraft productions appeared, such as textile, oil extraction, winemaking, metalworking, and ** manufacturing, which were gradually separated from agriculture. This great division of labor promoted the increase in productivity and the expansion of the scale of production, led to the emergence of commodity production for the direct purpose of exchange, and further expanded the scope of commodity exchange, thus accelerating the emergence of private ownership and the disintegration of primitive society. 3. The Third Great Social Division of Labor The third great social division of labor refers to the emergence of a merchant class that is not engaged in production but specializes in commodity exchange when primitive society collapses and slave society is formed.

The emergence of the merchant class shortened the time for the purchase and sale of commodities, expanded the sales channels for commodities, and once again promoted the development of commodity production and exchange.

In modern history, there are five social groups in Lu Shishan, and only four of them have actually been experienced, namely: primitive society, slave society, feudal society, capitalist society, and the existing imperfect socialist society, also known as the communist society. Satisfied.

The age of steam, the age of electricity, the age of information.

The first steam age, the Industrial Revolution, began in England in the sixties of the eighteenth century, and expanded in large numbers at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Therefore, from a macro point of view, the second period of the world's modern history, the steam age, began at the beginning of the 19th century and ended with the second industrial revolution in the 70s of the 19th century.

After 1870, the development of science and technology advanced by leaps and bounds, and various new technologies and inventions emerged one after another, and were rapidly applied to industrial production, which greatly promoted economic development. This is the Second Industrial Revolution. At that time, the outstanding development of science and technology was mainly manifested in three aspects, namely, the extensive application of electricity, the creation of internal combustion engines and new means of transportation, and the invention of new means of communication.

The third is the information age, the concept of time span in Europe, the United States and developed countries is from 1969 A.D. (1969ad) - the future of China and some developing countries refers to the information age from 1984 A.D. (1976ad) - the future is 15 years later than Europe and the United States. People often use the most representative production tools to represent a historical period, the development of human civilization: such as the Stone Age, the Red Copper Age, the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the Dark Age, the Enlightenment Age, the Steam Age, the Electric Age, the Atomic Age, etc.

If you look at the 20th century with this mindset, you would say that in the last 100 years, humanity has moved from the electric age to the information age.