Home machine choose LX3 ZS7 300HS which is better 5

Friends, I have helped other people analyze these three models, according to your personal use and preferences, you can compare and consider what suits you. But I'll make my point the same:

Comprehensiveness: ZS7 is greater than 300HS and greater than LX3

Cost-effective: ZS7 is greater than 300HS and LX3

Image quality: LX3 is greater than ZS7 > 300HS

To be clear, the LX3 isn't hard to learn, it's just that the manual features are a little more powerful than the other manual models, and the manual aspect is the most comprehensive of the three models you've compared.

If you have any other questions, please feel free to hi me.

Good luck!

The LX3 doesn't say anything about the scene when shooting scenes, the aperture is very good but the zoom is a little small, zoom. Take pictures of the landscape.

The LX3 is the first choice for night scenes, and it is no different from a regular digital camera when shooting people. If you want to achieve a good effect on shooting people, buy a DSLR machine and add a good lens, which is very useful. Hehe, the macro of the LX3 basically has the effect of a DSLR.

The ZS7 300HS I don't think it works as well as the LX3. There is technology to communicate a little bit.

I just struggled and finally bought the LX3, and later found out that the LX3 is indeed a lot better than the ZS7.

LX3The flagship machine of positioning the card,Of course, there is a reason for him,Large aperture,1 CCDThe two things are out of reach of ZS7,On the drawing paper,It's a lot better,Although ZS7The light becomes more,But I found from the use of the process that there are few times when I use such a large zoom,It's basically the wide-angle end to take pictures (before using 10XZ950)

Now the LX3 **with a 4G card** is around 2250, which is still very cost-effective.

If you want to zoom bigger, add some money and go directly to the LX5, the light has changed, and the image quality has also improved.

Personally, I think the Panasonic ZS7 card player has 1210 pixels, 25mm wide angle, and 16x telephoto. Leica lenses. HD video, autofocus, image stabilization, plus a word, Panasonic's ZS3 model was the number one seller in Japan last year. The ZS7 is the ZS3 Lift version.

LX3, after I bought it, I realized how good the wide angle is, now it's only more than 2,000 when I bought it for 3500, buy LX3 remember to buy a spare battery Domestic more than 50 yuan.

It mainly depends on your use and preferences, if you really like scenery and pursue high-quality picture quality, try LX3

It has a wide angle of 24mm, a large aperture can have a bokeh effect, a large CCD can make the picture quality better, 1cm ultra-macro, can shoot very close, the only disadvantage is that there is a slight lack of shooting people.

Using the telephoto end of a telephoto camera, you can see the tragedy of a lot of noise pixelation when you play it back on your computer.

The LX3 sacrifices the telephoto in exchange for image quality, and the aperture of the LX3 is oh

It depends on what you like to shoot, if you like scenery, go to LX3.

I bought the LX3 and I personally like it.

LX3 should be proud of his image quality, telephoto is not his strong point, if you like high image quality, I recommend you to start LX3, and LX3 upgraded version LX5 will be on the market recently, first go to see the online review, I believe it will be of great help to your decision.

Telephoto is useless for ordinary people, recommend LX3

LX3, telephoto is really not very useful. Besides, would you rather shoot a better **, or have a farther focal length. If you want to shoot landscapes, you need a telephoto, LX3 with a large aperture (but a sharp weapon, and a 24mm ultra-wide angle.

It can be said responsibly that ZS7 and LX3 are not on the same level. It's about the same as the G11. Besides, why are there still people willing to spend a lot of money on prime lenses?

Because the imaging of the prime is incomparable with the same grade zoom lens. You'll know if you've seen it.

Everything is more important than fine, not more.

Like telephoto,I also hope that the cheaper ones are ZS7,If you want to image the effectLX3,This is a semi-professional machine,Emphasis is on effect and professional control,And ZS7 is not a category。

The more omnipotent things are, the more disadvantages they have, and that's basically true. Panasonic rarely produces boutiques, but it is undeniable that the LX3 and GF1 are Panasonic's boutiques. For photographers, the LX3 is much stronger than the ZS7.

As for the telephoto, just forget it, not just any compact camera can achieve the power of the Leica V-Lux 1.

Choose LX3, the CCD of the recorded image is larger than ZS7, and the effect is definitely good, and the G11 and G10 of LX3 and Cannon are the top machines in the card machine, mainly because the CCD is large. There's nothing wrong with it.

Downstairs may not be clear about the definition of the entire production series of Panasonic cameras, right? It's not just the aperture that the LX3 uses a high-definition lens.

The LX belongs to the high-quality series and uses the L-head.

ZS is an entry-level home machine ZS is a telephoto card, and LX is a flagship with strong professionalism.

You just want to know the comparison of the lens structure of the two machines, right?

Several groups of lenses are lenses, which are composed of several lenses, and several groups are divided into several lens groups.

Aspherical lenses are a phenomenon that reduces the aberration of the edge of the lens to improve the distortion and distortion of vision at the edge of the spherical lens, so the theory says that the more aspherical lenses, the lower the deformity rate of the imaging edge.

ED lenses are low-dispersion lenses, but ED lenses are also divided into qualities, and the more ED lenses, the sharper and more vivid the colors.

In this way, theoretically, the edge distortion of the LX3 lens should be small, while the ZS7 image should be more vivid.

However, the positioning of the LX3 is higher than that of the ZS7, and the overall level of the ZS7 is good, and there are no obvious shortcomings.

The overall image quality of the LX3 CCD is higher than that of the ZS7

Panasonic won't come out with two machines with similar performance on the market at the same time, and that's shooting itself in the foot.

If the LX3 is a professional, then the ZS7 is a quasi-professional.

Your first question has already been said, so I won't repeat it. The difference between summicron and elmart is mainly in the size of the volume, S should be large, E should be small, this can be compared by looking at the size of the camera. Natural imaging of large heads is better than small heads, and the aperture is also larger.

Giving you a link to introduce the two lenses, you can analyze it yourself.

In addition, I personally think that the main difference between LX3 and ZS7 is the difference in focal length, 24mm and 25mm wide angle are almost the same, but 60mm and 300mm telephoto is obviously 300mm better. If you want to take pictures for travel, the focal length of the ZS7 can meet any of your needs, but the focal length of the LX3 is too limited, of course, you can choose to sacrifice the image quality to increase the light change factor of the LX3, as for whether the image quality will lose the ZS7, you can see for yourself when you test the machine.

Finally, as the ZS3 also has 12X optical change, the cost performance should be higher than that of the ZS7.

Why did you buy a camera? Spent so much money to buy an LX3 with fatal flaws and no telephoto (or made in 08), just for the looks? I'm new to ZS7, so let's talk about my feelings.

I have a SLR is 450D, but I feel that it is too inconvenient for the SLR to take pictures casually, so I am ready to enter a card machine. I read many forum posts and compared the parameters with myself, and I feel that the best cost performance is ZS7. Looking at the ZS7 on the Internet, I feel that the appearance is not outstanding, but I am for photography, so I didn't think too much about this decisive start.

I chose the black one, and to be honest, it feels much better than the online **. I bought it online on JD.com.,Spent 2150 yuan.,I think black and gold look better.,White and red feel very general.,But Jingdong didn't have a golden one and entered the black one.。 This is the first time I have used Panasonic's camera, and the imaging of 8 groups of 10 Leica lenses is still very good.

The telephoto is really convenient, it's a card street photography artifact! Anyway, I really like the ZS7 camera now. I don't think you will regret the performance of the ZS7 after you choose it.

The above are some of my small suggestions, not to get points, I just hope you can buy a camera that you really love and shoot well! o(∩_o

lx3……Consider starting with a magnification lens to increase the focal length exponentially.

It's entirely up to you ......The LX3 is basically sufficient, and with the extender lens it is almost enough.

But with the addition of a magnifier, it doesn't look so good ==

ZS7 is really ugly ......

What about the Sony HX5C, what about a different brand?

Sony is also good.

Ricoh CX4 Ricoh is also a major optical manufacturer, very strong.

LX3 Personally, I think the LX3 image quality is better, and the configuration is not low (the large aperture is still very practical).

The reason for the limited focal length is to ensure its image quality.

I bought the lx3 myself, and I still recommend this.

1 CCD, F2 aperture, Leica lens, plus give way to the LX5, and now the LX3** is already very good. You have to evaluate for yourself how much the telephoto will work for you, after all, the LX3 is the king of yesteryear.

The upgraded version of the LX3 is the LX5

Both LX3 and LX5 have a maximum aperture of !This is a very big advantage when shooting in low-light environments. And, if you look at the LX3 and LX5, they're quite expensive.

ZS7 is just a telephoto machine, more than ten times the light change, is it necessary? **The zoom ratio is not more than 3 times, and a good lens cannot be designed to optimize the image quality of any focal length!

Again, the maximum aperture of the ZS7 is only , which is a tragedy. You may not feel much in the light when the light is good, so go cry in a low-light environment.

You know, profiteers highly recommend it for a reason. Often such a machine is his high profit, and something that needs to be cleared as soon as possible.

Brother, be careful.

The upgraded version of the LX3 is the LX5

The ZS7 is much cheaper than the LX3, and of course it's far from it

ZS7 and LX3 positioning is different,To say that imaging and performance are not much better than LX3,To say home practicality, on the contrary, ZS7 is more practical,Of course, if you use it at home, I will also recommend ZS7,But the reason is definitely not what is upgraded or better,But it is more suitable for home use,Although LX3 imaging and other performance are very good,But the focal length range is its biggest weakness,It can only be used as a DSLR standby or telephoto supplement model,It's really inappropriate to use it at home,You think about it, But don't listen to the seller's say that ZS7 is much better than LX3, **aspect reference network**, don't consider the expensive outrageous, in fact, if you are pragmatic, ZS5 is completely suitable for you, and the cost performance is higher, you should consider it.

No. The LX3 is more professional, and the ZS7 is suitable for everyday ranges such as travel.

Don't listen to people talking nonsense about how good the LX3 is, it is a backup machine for SLR, high-end and other demagoguery, buying a cheap SLR is definitely stronger than it, ** It's cheaper.

Generally speaking, ZS7 is used